不同肌肉组选择导出模块对组间肌电反复性的影响

Translated title of the contribution: Choice of muscles for extracting consistent motor modules: the effect of trial-to-trial electromyography repeatability

Kim Yushin, Kim Minhee, Yoon Bumchul, Lee Sangheon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To identify the effect of the repeatability of muscle activations on extraction of consistent motor modules across trials. Methods: The activities of sixteen muscles in twelve subjects who consistently walked at a self-selected speed were recorded. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to identify inter-stride repeatability of muscle activities and motor modules. Based on the repeatability of muscle activation, three types of muscle sets were organized. Results: The reliable set containing the muscles showed high ICC (>0.4), but the whole-body and mixed sets containing the muscles showed poor ICC (<0.4). When motor modules were extracted from each set, the reliable set showed the highest repeatability of motor module extraction, but the whole-body and mixed sets presented significantly lower repeatability. Conclusions: Greater repeatability of muscle activations result ed in consistent motor modules. Extraction of consistent motor modules was a critical issue, especially in real-time motion recognition based on muscle patterns.

Translated title of the contributionChoice of muscles for extracting consistent motor modules: the effect of trial-to-trial electromyography repeatability
Original languageChinese (Traditional)
Pages (from-to)425-433
Number of pages9
JournalYiyong Shengwu Lixue/Journal of Medical Biomechanics
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Aug 1

Keywords

  • Electromyography(EMG)
  • Muscle activation
  • Repeatability
  • Stability
  • Walking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Choice of muscles for extracting consistent motor modules: the effect of trial-to-trial electromyography repeatability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this