A chemical risk ranking and scoring method for the selection of harmful substances to be specially controlled in occupational environments

Saemi Shin, Hyung Il Moon, Kwon Seob Lee, Mun Ki Hong, Sang Hoon Byeon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study aimed to devise a method for prioritizing hazardous chemicals for further regulatory action. To accomplish this objective, we chose appropriate indicators and algorithms. Nine indicators from the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals were used to identify categories to which the authors assigned numerical scores. Exposure indicators included handling volume, distribution, and exposure level. To test the method devised by this study, sixty-two harmful substances controlled by the Occupational Safety and Health Act in Korea, including acrylamide, acrylonitrile, and styrene were ranked using this proposed method. The correlation coefficients between total score and each indicator ranged from 0.160 to 0.641, and those between total score and hazard indicators ranged from 0.603 to 0.641. The latter were higher than the correlation coefficients between total score and exposure indicators, which ranged from 0.160 to 0.421. Correlations between individual indicators were low (−0.240 to 0.376), except for those between handling volume and distribution (0.613), suggesting that each indicator was not strongly correlated. The low correlations between each indicator mean that the indicators and independent and were well chosen for prioritizing harmful chemicals. This method proposed by this study can improve the cost efficiency of chemical management as utilized in occupational regulatory systems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)12001-12014
Number of pages14
JournalInternational journal of environmental research and public health
Volume11
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Nov 20

Fingerprint

Research Design
Occupational Health
Acrylonitrile
Hazardous Substances
Styrene
Acrylamide
Korea
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Chemical management
  • Occupational environment
  • Risk ranking
  • Scoring method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

A chemical risk ranking and scoring method for the selection of harmful substances to be specially controlled in occupational environments. / Shin, Saemi; Moon, Hyung Il; Lee, Kwon Seob; Hong, Mun Ki; Byeon, Sang Hoon.

In: International journal of environmental research and public health, Vol. 11, No. 11, 20.11.2014, p. 12001-12014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a1dde4fdb6594535ba541486d07b3e76,
title = "A chemical risk ranking and scoring method for the selection of harmful substances to be specially controlled in occupational environments",
abstract = "This study aimed to devise a method for prioritizing hazardous chemicals for further regulatory action. To accomplish this objective, we chose appropriate indicators and algorithms. Nine indicators from the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals were used to identify categories to which the authors assigned numerical scores. Exposure indicators included handling volume, distribution, and exposure level. To test the method devised by this study, sixty-two harmful substances controlled by the Occupational Safety and Health Act in Korea, including acrylamide, acrylonitrile, and styrene were ranked using this proposed method. The correlation coefficients between total score and each indicator ranged from 0.160 to 0.641, and those between total score and hazard indicators ranged from 0.603 to 0.641. The latter were higher than the correlation coefficients between total score and exposure indicators, which ranged from 0.160 to 0.421. Correlations between individual indicators were low (−0.240 to 0.376), except for those between handling volume and distribution (0.613), suggesting that each indicator was not strongly correlated. The low correlations between each indicator mean that the indicators and independent and were well chosen for prioritizing harmful chemicals. This method proposed by this study can improve the cost efficiency of chemical management as utilized in occupational regulatory systems.",
keywords = "Chemical management, Occupational environment, Risk ranking, Scoring method",
author = "Saemi Shin and Moon, {Hyung Il} and Lee, {Kwon Seob} and Hong, {Mun Ki} and Byeon, {Sang Hoon}",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "20",
doi = "10.3390/ijerph111112001",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "12001--12014",
journal = "International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health",
issn = "1661-7827",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A chemical risk ranking and scoring method for the selection of harmful substances to be specially controlled in occupational environments

AU - Shin, Saemi

AU - Moon, Hyung Il

AU - Lee, Kwon Seob

AU - Hong, Mun Ki

AU - Byeon, Sang Hoon

PY - 2014/11/20

Y1 - 2014/11/20

N2 - This study aimed to devise a method for prioritizing hazardous chemicals for further regulatory action. To accomplish this objective, we chose appropriate indicators and algorithms. Nine indicators from the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals were used to identify categories to which the authors assigned numerical scores. Exposure indicators included handling volume, distribution, and exposure level. To test the method devised by this study, sixty-two harmful substances controlled by the Occupational Safety and Health Act in Korea, including acrylamide, acrylonitrile, and styrene were ranked using this proposed method. The correlation coefficients between total score and each indicator ranged from 0.160 to 0.641, and those between total score and hazard indicators ranged from 0.603 to 0.641. The latter were higher than the correlation coefficients between total score and exposure indicators, which ranged from 0.160 to 0.421. Correlations between individual indicators were low (−0.240 to 0.376), except for those between handling volume and distribution (0.613), suggesting that each indicator was not strongly correlated. The low correlations between each indicator mean that the indicators and independent and were well chosen for prioritizing harmful chemicals. This method proposed by this study can improve the cost efficiency of chemical management as utilized in occupational regulatory systems.

AB - This study aimed to devise a method for prioritizing hazardous chemicals for further regulatory action. To accomplish this objective, we chose appropriate indicators and algorithms. Nine indicators from the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals were used to identify categories to which the authors assigned numerical scores. Exposure indicators included handling volume, distribution, and exposure level. To test the method devised by this study, sixty-two harmful substances controlled by the Occupational Safety and Health Act in Korea, including acrylamide, acrylonitrile, and styrene were ranked using this proposed method. The correlation coefficients between total score and each indicator ranged from 0.160 to 0.641, and those between total score and hazard indicators ranged from 0.603 to 0.641. The latter were higher than the correlation coefficients between total score and exposure indicators, which ranged from 0.160 to 0.421. Correlations between individual indicators were low (−0.240 to 0.376), except for those between handling volume and distribution (0.613), suggesting that each indicator was not strongly correlated. The low correlations between each indicator mean that the indicators and independent and were well chosen for prioritizing harmful chemicals. This method proposed by this study can improve the cost efficiency of chemical management as utilized in occupational regulatory systems.

KW - Chemical management

KW - Occupational environment

KW - Risk ranking

KW - Scoring method

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939440975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939440975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/ijerph111112001

DO - 10.3390/ijerph111112001

M3 - Article

C2 - 25419874

AN - SCOPUS:84939440975

VL - 11

SP - 12001

EP - 12014

JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

SN - 1661-7827

IS - 11

ER -