A comparison between central blood pressure values obtained by the Gaon system and the SphygmoCor system

Jun Hyuk Kang, Dae In Lee, Sua Kim, Sun Won Kim, Sung Il Im, Jin Oh Na, Cheol Ung Choi, Hong Euy Lim, Jin Won Kim, Eung Ju Kim, Seung Woo Han, Seung-Woon Rha, Hong Seog Seo, Dong Joo Oh, Chang Gyu Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Central pulse pressure is correlated with carotid atherosclerosis and the incidence of cardiovascular events more significantly than brachial pulse pressure. Augmentation index (Aix) has been shown to be an independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Pulse wave analysis using the Gaon system allows for the estimation of central blood pressure (CBP), corrected augmentation index (Aix@HR75), ejection duration (ED) and subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR), and is widely used in clinical research in Korea. However, the accuracy of this system is controversial. From February 2008 to March 2011, 99 patients were recruited for this study. Measurements were taken both by the Gaon system and the SphygmoCor system on the same day for all study participants. The estimated values of CBP, Aix@HR75, ED and SEVR for the two systems were compared using paired t-tests, simple correlation analyses and Bland-Altman plots. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) estimated by the two systems was significantly (P0.001) correlated; the coefficient was 0.982. The two s.d. of the difference in SBP between these systems was quite small-<7 mm Hg. Aix@HR75, ED and SEVR as estimated by the two systems were also significantly correlated, although they, especially SEVR, showed much weaker correlations than were observed in SBP: coefficients for Aix@HR75, ED and SEVR were 0.727, 0.648 and 0.230, respectively. We assessed the CBP of Korean patients estimated by the two systems and observed that the correlations of Aix, ED and SEVR were weaker than that of CBP. Such variations may be due to the difference in measuring methods between the devices. As even a slight change in pulse waveforms may result in a large difference in estimations, parameters, including Aix@HR75, ED and SEVR, should be carefully interpreted by experienced clinicians.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)329-333
Number of pages5
JournalHypertension Research
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Blood Pressure
Pulse Wave Analysis
Carotid Artery Diseases
Korea
Pulse
Arm
Morbidity
Equipment and Supplies
Mortality
Incidence
Research

Keywords

  • augmentation index
  • central blood pressure
  • pulse wave analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Physiology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

A comparison between central blood pressure values obtained by the Gaon system and the SphygmoCor system. / Kang, Jun Hyuk; Lee, Dae In; Kim, Sua; Kim, Sun Won; Im, Sung Il; Na, Jin Oh; Choi, Cheol Ung; Lim, Hong Euy; Kim, Jin Won; Kim, Eung Ju; Han, Seung Woo; Rha, Seung-Woon; Seo, Hong Seog; Oh, Dong Joo; Park, Chang Gyu.

In: Hypertension Research, Vol. 35, No. 3, 01.03.2012, p. 329-333.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kang, Jun Hyuk ; Lee, Dae In ; Kim, Sua ; Kim, Sun Won ; Im, Sung Il ; Na, Jin Oh ; Choi, Cheol Ung ; Lim, Hong Euy ; Kim, Jin Won ; Kim, Eung Ju ; Han, Seung Woo ; Rha, Seung-Woon ; Seo, Hong Seog ; Oh, Dong Joo ; Park, Chang Gyu. / A comparison between central blood pressure values obtained by the Gaon system and the SphygmoCor system. In: Hypertension Research. 2012 ; Vol. 35, No. 3. pp. 329-333.
@article{b686e0db2e554377a825fd5c8754a144,
title = "A comparison between central blood pressure values obtained by the Gaon system and the SphygmoCor system",
abstract = "Central pulse pressure is correlated with carotid atherosclerosis and the incidence of cardiovascular events more significantly than brachial pulse pressure. Augmentation index (Aix) has been shown to be an independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Pulse wave analysis using the Gaon system allows for the estimation of central blood pressure (CBP), corrected augmentation index (Aix@HR75), ejection duration (ED) and subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR), and is widely used in clinical research in Korea. However, the accuracy of this system is controversial. From February 2008 to March 2011, 99 patients were recruited for this study. Measurements were taken both by the Gaon system and the SphygmoCor system on the same day for all study participants. The estimated values of CBP, Aix@HR75, ED and SEVR for the two systems were compared using paired t-tests, simple correlation analyses and Bland-Altman plots. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) estimated by the two systems was significantly (P0.001) correlated; the coefficient was 0.982. The two s.d. of the difference in SBP between these systems was quite small-<7 mm Hg. Aix@HR75, ED and SEVR as estimated by the two systems were also significantly correlated, although they, especially SEVR, showed much weaker correlations than were observed in SBP: coefficients for Aix@HR75, ED and SEVR were 0.727, 0.648 and 0.230, respectively. We assessed the CBP of Korean patients estimated by the two systems and observed that the correlations of Aix, ED and SEVR were weaker than that of CBP. Such variations may be due to the difference in measuring methods between the devices. As even a slight change in pulse waveforms may result in a large difference in estimations, parameters, including Aix@HR75, ED and SEVR, should be carefully interpreted by experienced clinicians.",
keywords = "augmentation index, central blood pressure, pulse wave analysis",
author = "Kang, {Jun Hyuk} and Lee, {Dae In} and Sua Kim and Kim, {Sun Won} and Im, {Sung Il} and Na, {Jin Oh} and Choi, {Cheol Ung} and Lim, {Hong Euy} and Kim, {Jin Won} and Kim, {Eung Ju} and Han, {Seung Woo} and Seung-Woon Rha and Seo, {Hong Seog} and Oh, {Dong Joo} and Park, {Chang Gyu}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/hr.2011.192",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "329--333",
journal = "Hypertension Research",
issn = "0916-9636",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison between central blood pressure values obtained by the Gaon system and the SphygmoCor system

AU - Kang, Jun Hyuk

AU - Lee, Dae In

AU - Kim, Sua

AU - Kim, Sun Won

AU - Im, Sung Il

AU - Na, Jin Oh

AU - Choi, Cheol Ung

AU - Lim, Hong Euy

AU - Kim, Jin Won

AU - Kim, Eung Ju

AU - Han, Seung Woo

AU - Rha, Seung-Woon

AU - Seo, Hong Seog

AU - Oh, Dong Joo

AU - Park, Chang Gyu

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - Central pulse pressure is correlated with carotid atherosclerosis and the incidence of cardiovascular events more significantly than brachial pulse pressure. Augmentation index (Aix) has been shown to be an independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Pulse wave analysis using the Gaon system allows for the estimation of central blood pressure (CBP), corrected augmentation index (Aix@HR75), ejection duration (ED) and subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR), and is widely used in clinical research in Korea. However, the accuracy of this system is controversial. From February 2008 to March 2011, 99 patients were recruited for this study. Measurements were taken both by the Gaon system and the SphygmoCor system on the same day for all study participants. The estimated values of CBP, Aix@HR75, ED and SEVR for the two systems were compared using paired t-tests, simple correlation analyses and Bland-Altman plots. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) estimated by the two systems was significantly (P0.001) correlated; the coefficient was 0.982. The two s.d. of the difference in SBP between these systems was quite small-<7 mm Hg. Aix@HR75, ED and SEVR as estimated by the two systems were also significantly correlated, although they, especially SEVR, showed much weaker correlations than were observed in SBP: coefficients for Aix@HR75, ED and SEVR were 0.727, 0.648 and 0.230, respectively. We assessed the CBP of Korean patients estimated by the two systems and observed that the correlations of Aix, ED and SEVR were weaker than that of CBP. Such variations may be due to the difference in measuring methods between the devices. As even a slight change in pulse waveforms may result in a large difference in estimations, parameters, including Aix@HR75, ED and SEVR, should be carefully interpreted by experienced clinicians.

AB - Central pulse pressure is correlated with carotid atherosclerosis and the incidence of cardiovascular events more significantly than brachial pulse pressure. Augmentation index (Aix) has been shown to be an independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Pulse wave analysis using the Gaon system allows for the estimation of central blood pressure (CBP), corrected augmentation index (Aix@HR75), ejection duration (ED) and subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR), and is widely used in clinical research in Korea. However, the accuracy of this system is controversial. From February 2008 to March 2011, 99 patients were recruited for this study. Measurements were taken both by the Gaon system and the SphygmoCor system on the same day for all study participants. The estimated values of CBP, Aix@HR75, ED and SEVR for the two systems were compared using paired t-tests, simple correlation analyses and Bland-Altman plots. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) estimated by the two systems was significantly (P0.001) correlated; the coefficient was 0.982. The two s.d. of the difference in SBP between these systems was quite small-<7 mm Hg. Aix@HR75, ED and SEVR as estimated by the two systems were also significantly correlated, although they, especially SEVR, showed much weaker correlations than were observed in SBP: coefficients for Aix@HR75, ED and SEVR were 0.727, 0.648 and 0.230, respectively. We assessed the CBP of Korean patients estimated by the two systems and observed that the correlations of Aix, ED and SEVR were weaker than that of CBP. Such variations may be due to the difference in measuring methods between the devices. As even a slight change in pulse waveforms may result in a large difference in estimations, parameters, including Aix@HR75, ED and SEVR, should be carefully interpreted by experienced clinicians.

KW - augmentation index

KW - central blood pressure

KW - pulse wave analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863282514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863282514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/hr.2011.192

DO - 10.1038/hr.2011.192

M3 - Article

C2 - 22158112

AN - SCOPUS:84863282514

VL - 35

SP - 329

EP - 333

JO - Hypertension Research

JF - Hypertension Research

SN - 0916-9636

IS - 3

ER -