A glossary of terms for understanding political aspects in the implementation of Health in All Policies (HiAP)

Goldameir Oneka, Faraz Vahid Shahidi, Carles Muntaner, Ahmed M. Bayoumi, Deb Finn Mahabir, Alix Freiler, Patricia O'Campo, Ketan Shankardass

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Health in All Policies (HiAP) is a strategy that seeks to integrate health considerations into the development, implementation and evaluation of policies across various non-health sectors of the government. Over the past 15 years, there has been an increase in the uptake of HiAP by local, regional and national governments. Despite the growing popularity of this approach, most existing literature on HiAP implementation remains descriptive rather than explanatory in its orientation. Moreover, prior research has focused on the more technical aspects of the implementation process. Thus, studies that aim to 'build capacity to promote, implement and evaluate HiAP' abound. Conversely, there is little emphasis on the political aspects of HiAP implementation. Neglecting the role of politics in shaping the use of HiAP is problematic, since health and the strategies by which it is promoted are partially political. This glossary addresses the politics gap in the existing literature by drawing on theoretical concepts from political, policy, and public health sciences to articulate a framework for studying how political mechanisms influence HiAP implementation. To this end, the glossary forms part of an on-going multiple explanatory case study of HiAP implementation, HARMONICS (HiAP Analysis using Realist Methods on International Case Studies, harmonics- hiap. ca), and is meant to expand on a previously published glossary addressing the topic of HiAP implementation more broadly. Collectively, these glossaries offer a conceptual toolkit for understanding how politics explains implementation outcomes of HiAP.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)835-838
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Volume71
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Aug 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health
Politics
Local Government
Federal Government
Policy Making
Public Health
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Oneka, G., Shahidi, F. V., Muntaner, C., Bayoumi, A. M., Mahabir, D. F., Freiler, A., ... Shankardass, K. (2017). A glossary of terms for understanding political aspects in the implementation of Health in All Policies (HiAP). Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 71(8), 835-838. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2017-208979

A glossary of terms for understanding political aspects in the implementation of Health in All Policies (HiAP). / Oneka, Goldameir; Shahidi, Faraz Vahid; Muntaner, Carles; Bayoumi, Ahmed M.; Mahabir, Deb Finn; Freiler, Alix; O'Campo, Patricia; Shankardass, Ketan.

In: Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Vol. 71, No. 8, 01.08.2017, p. 835-838.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Oneka, G, Shahidi, FV, Muntaner, C, Bayoumi, AM, Mahabir, DF, Freiler, A, O'Campo, P & Shankardass, K 2017, 'A glossary of terms for understanding political aspects in the implementation of Health in All Policies (HiAP)', Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 835-838. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2017-208979
Oneka, Goldameir ; Shahidi, Faraz Vahid ; Muntaner, Carles ; Bayoumi, Ahmed M. ; Mahabir, Deb Finn ; Freiler, Alix ; O'Campo, Patricia ; Shankardass, Ketan. / A glossary of terms for understanding political aspects in the implementation of Health in All Policies (HiAP). In: Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2017 ; Vol. 71, No. 8. pp. 835-838.
@article{20ef01737f05473b9b0863607713603f,
title = "A glossary of terms for understanding political aspects in the implementation of Health in All Policies (HiAP)",
abstract = "Health in All Policies (HiAP) is a strategy that seeks to integrate health considerations into the development, implementation and evaluation of policies across various non-health sectors of the government. Over the past 15 years, there has been an increase in the uptake of HiAP by local, regional and national governments. Despite the growing popularity of this approach, most existing literature on HiAP implementation remains descriptive rather than explanatory in its orientation. Moreover, prior research has focused on the more technical aspects of the implementation process. Thus, studies that aim to 'build capacity to promote, implement and evaluate HiAP' abound. Conversely, there is little emphasis on the political aspects of HiAP implementation. Neglecting the role of politics in shaping the use of HiAP is problematic, since health and the strategies by which it is promoted are partially political. This glossary addresses the politics gap in the existing literature by drawing on theoretical concepts from political, policy, and public health sciences to articulate a framework for studying how political mechanisms influence HiAP implementation. To this end, the glossary forms part of an on-going multiple explanatory case study of HiAP implementation, HARMONICS (HiAP Analysis using Realist Methods on International Case Studies, harmonics- hiap. ca), and is meant to expand on a previously published glossary addressing the topic of HiAP implementation more broadly. Collectively, these glossaries offer a conceptual toolkit for understanding how politics explains implementation outcomes of HiAP.",
author = "Goldameir Oneka and Shahidi, {Faraz Vahid} and Carles Muntaner and Bayoumi, {Ahmed M.} and Mahabir, {Deb Finn} and Alix Freiler and Patricia O'Campo and Ketan Shankardass",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/jech-2017-208979",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "835--838",
journal = "Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health",
issn = "0143-005X",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A glossary of terms for understanding political aspects in the implementation of Health in All Policies (HiAP)

AU - Oneka, Goldameir

AU - Shahidi, Faraz Vahid

AU - Muntaner, Carles

AU - Bayoumi, Ahmed M.

AU - Mahabir, Deb Finn

AU - Freiler, Alix

AU - O'Campo, Patricia

AU - Shankardass, Ketan

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Health in All Policies (HiAP) is a strategy that seeks to integrate health considerations into the development, implementation and evaluation of policies across various non-health sectors of the government. Over the past 15 years, there has been an increase in the uptake of HiAP by local, regional and national governments. Despite the growing popularity of this approach, most existing literature on HiAP implementation remains descriptive rather than explanatory in its orientation. Moreover, prior research has focused on the more technical aspects of the implementation process. Thus, studies that aim to 'build capacity to promote, implement and evaluate HiAP' abound. Conversely, there is little emphasis on the political aspects of HiAP implementation. Neglecting the role of politics in shaping the use of HiAP is problematic, since health and the strategies by which it is promoted are partially political. This glossary addresses the politics gap in the existing literature by drawing on theoretical concepts from political, policy, and public health sciences to articulate a framework for studying how political mechanisms influence HiAP implementation. To this end, the glossary forms part of an on-going multiple explanatory case study of HiAP implementation, HARMONICS (HiAP Analysis using Realist Methods on International Case Studies, harmonics- hiap. ca), and is meant to expand on a previously published glossary addressing the topic of HiAP implementation more broadly. Collectively, these glossaries offer a conceptual toolkit for understanding how politics explains implementation outcomes of HiAP.

AB - Health in All Policies (HiAP) is a strategy that seeks to integrate health considerations into the development, implementation and evaluation of policies across various non-health sectors of the government. Over the past 15 years, there has been an increase in the uptake of HiAP by local, regional and national governments. Despite the growing popularity of this approach, most existing literature on HiAP implementation remains descriptive rather than explanatory in its orientation. Moreover, prior research has focused on the more technical aspects of the implementation process. Thus, studies that aim to 'build capacity to promote, implement and evaluate HiAP' abound. Conversely, there is little emphasis on the political aspects of HiAP implementation. Neglecting the role of politics in shaping the use of HiAP is problematic, since health and the strategies by which it is promoted are partially political. This glossary addresses the politics gap in the existing literature by drawing on theoretical concepts from political, policy, and public health sciences to articulate a framework for studying how political mechanisms influence HiAP implementation. To this end, the glossary forms part of an on-going multiple explanatory case study of HiAP implementation, HARMONICS (HiAP Analysis using Realist Methods on International Case Studies, harmonics- hiap. ca), and is meant to expand on a previously published glossary addressing the topic of HiAP implementation more broadly. Collectively, these glossaries offer a conceptual toolkit for understanding how politics explains implementation outcomes of HiAP.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024408411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024408411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/jech-2017-208979

DO - 10.1136/jech-2017-208979

M3 - Article

C2 - 28679539

AN - SCOPUS:85024408411

VL - 71

SP - 835

EP - 838

JO - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

JF - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

SN - 0143-005X

IS - 8

ER -