TY - JOUR
T1 - A normative study of lexical verbal fluency in an educationally-diverse elderly population
AU - Kim, Bong Jo
AU - Lee, Cheol Soon
AU - Oh, Byoung Hoon
AU - Hong, Chang Hyung
AU - Lee, Kang Soo
AU - Son, Sang Joon
AU - Han, Changsu
AU - Park, Moon Ho
AU - Jeong, Hyun Ghang
AU - Kim, Tae Hui
AU - Park, Joon Hyuk
AU - Kim, Ki Woong
PY - 2013/12
Y1 - 2013/12
N2 - Objective Lexical fuency tests are frequently used to assess language and executive function in clinical practice. We investigated the infuences of age, gender, and education on lexical verbal fuency in an educationally-diverse, elderly Korean population and provided its' normative information. Methods We administered the lexical verbal fuency test (LVFT) to 1676 community-dwelling, cognitively normal subjects aged 60 years or over. Results In a stepwise linear regression analysis, education (B=0.40, SE=0.02, standardized B=0.506) and age (B=-0.10, SE=0.01, standardized B=-0.15) had signifcant efects on LVFT scores (p<0.001), but gender did not (B=0.40, SE=0.02, standardized B=0.506, p>0.05). Education explained 28.5% of the total variance in LVFT scores, which was much larger than the variance explained by age (5.42%). Accordingly, we presented normative data of the LVFT stratifed by age (60-69, 70-74, 75-79, and ≥80 years) and education (0-3, 4-6, 7-9, 10-12, and ≥13 years). Conclusion The LVFT norms should provide clinically useful data for evaluating elderly people and help improve the interpretation of verbal fuency tasks and allow for greater diagnostic accuracy.
AB - Objective Lexical fuency tests are frequently used to assess language and executive function in clinical practice. We investigated the infuences of age, gender, and education on lexical verbal fuency in an educationally-diverse, elderly Korean population and provided its' normative information. Methods We administered the lexical verbal fuency test (LVFT) to 1676 community-dwelling, cognitively normal subjects aged 60 years or over. Results In a stepwise linear regression analysis, education (B=0.40, SE=0.02, standardized B=0.506) and age (B=-0.10, SE=0.01, standardized B=-0.15) had signifcant efects on LVFT scores (p<0.001), but gender did not (B=0.40, SE=0.02, standardized B=0.506, p>0.05). Education explained 28.5% of the total variance in LVFT scores, which was much larger than the variance explained by age (5.42%). Accordingly, we presented normative data of the LVFT stratifed by age (60-69, 70-74, 75-79, and ≥80 years) and education (0-3, 4-6, 7-9, 10-12, and ≥13 years). Conclusion The LVFT norms should provide clinically useful data for evaluating elderly people and help improve the interpretation of verbal fuency tasks and allow for greater diagnostic accuracy.
KW - Age
KW - Education
KW - Elders
KW - Korean
KW - Lexical verbal fuency
KW - Normative data
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892533593&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4306/pi.2013.10.4.346
DO - 10.4306/pi.2013.10.4.346
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84892533593
SN - 1738-3684
VL - 10
SP - 346
EP - 351
JO - Psychiatry Investigation
JF - Psychiatry Investigation
IS - 4
ER -