A pilot study of endoscopic submucosal dissection using an endoscopic assistive robot in a porcine stomach model

Byung Gon Kim, Hyuk Soon Choi, Sei Hoon Park, Jun Ho Hong, Jung Min Lee, Seung Han Kim, Hoon-Jai Chun, Daehie Hong, Bora Keum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Aims: Endoscopic assistive devices have been developed to reduce the complexity and improve the safety of surgeries involving the use of endoscopes. We developed an assistive robotic arm for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and evaluated its efficiency and safety in this in vitro pilot study. Methods: ESD was performed using an auxiliary transluminal endoscopic robot. An in vitro test bed replicating the intra-abdominal environment and pig stomachs were used for the experiment. Participants were divided into skilled operators and unskilled operators. Each group performed ESD 10 times by using both conventional and robot-assisted methods. The perforation incidence, operation time, and resected mucous membrane size were measured. Results: For the conventional method, significant differences were noted between skilled and unskilled operators regarding operation time (11.3 minutes vs 26.7 minutes) and perforation incidence (0/10 vs 6/10). Unskilled operators showed a large decrease in the perforation incidence with the robot-assisted method (conventional method vs robot-assisted method, 6/10 vs 1/10). However, the operation time did not differ between the conventional and robotassisted methods. On the other hand, skilled operators did not show differences in the operation time and perforation incidence between the conventional and robot-assisted methods. Among both skilled and unskilled operators, the operation time decreased with the robot-assisted method as the experiment proceeded. Conclusions: The surgical safety of unskilled operators greatly improved with robotic assistance. Thus, our assistive robotic arm was beneficial for ESD. Our findings suggest that endoscopic assistive robots have positive effects on surgical safety.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)402-408
Number of pages7
JournalGut and Liver
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Stomach
Swine
Robotics
Safety
Incidence
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Self-Help Devices
Endoscopes
Mucous Membrane

Keywords

  • Computer-assisted
  • Endoscopic mucosal resection
  • Endoscopy
  • Pilot projects
  • Surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

A pilot study of endoscopic submucosal dissection using an endoscopic assistive robot in a porcine stomach model. / Kim, Byung Gon; Choi, Hyuk Soon; Park, Sei Hoon; Hong, Jun Ho; Lee, Jung Min; Kim, Seung Han; Chun, Hoon-Jai; Hong, Daehie; Keum, Bora.

In: Gut and Liver, Vol. 13, No. 4, 01.01.2019, p. 402-408.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, Byung Gon ; Choi, Hyuk Soon ; Park, Sei Hoon ; Hong, Jun Ho ; Lee, Jung Min ; Kim, Seung Han ; Chun, Hoon-Jai ; Hong, Daehie ; Keum, Bora. / A pilot study of endoscopic submucosal dissection using an endoscopic assistive robot in a porcine stomach model. In: Gut and Liver. 2019 ; Vol. 13, No. 4. pp. 402-408.
@article{8d5ffa516ce0465d868448038bb31faf,
title = "A pilot study of endoscopic submucosal dissection using an endoscopic assistive robot in a porcine stomach model",
abstract = "Background/Aims: Endoscopic assistive devices have been developed to reduce the complexity and improve the safety of surgeries involving the use of endoscopes. We developed an assistive robotic arm for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and evaluated its efficiency and safety in this in vitro pilot study. Methods: ESD was performed using an auxiliary transluminal endoscopic robot. An in vitro test bed replicating the intra-abdominal environment and pig stomachs were used for the experiment. Participants were divided into skilled operators and unskilled operators. Each group performed ESD 10 times by using both conventional and robot-assisted methods. The perforation incidence, operation time, and resected mucous membrane size were measured. Results: For the conventional method, significant differences were noted between skilled and unskilled operators regarding operation time (11.3 minutes vs 26.7 minutes) and perforation incidence (0/10 vs 6/10). Unskilled operators showed a large decrease in the perforation incidence with the robot-assisted method (conventional method vs robot-assisted method, 6/10 vs 1/10). However, the operation time did not differ between the conventional and robotassisted methods. On the other hand, skilled operators did not show differences in the operation time and perforation incidence between the conventional and robot-assisted methods. Among both skilled and unskilled operators, the operation time decreased with the robot-assisted method as the experiment proceeded. Conclusions: The surgical safety of unskilled operators greatly improved with robotic assistance. Thus, our assistive robotic arm was beneficial for ESD. Our findings suggest that endoscopic assistive robots have positive effects on surgical safety.",
keywords = "Computer-assisted, Endoscopic mucosal resection, Endoscopy, Pilot projects, Surgery",
author = "Kim, {Byung Gon} and Choi, {Hyuk Soon} and Park, {Sei Hoon} and Hong, {Jun Ho} and Lee, {Jung Min} and Kim, {Seung Han} and Hoon-Jai Chun and Daehie Hong and Bora Keum",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5009/gnl18370",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "402--408",
journal = "Gut and Liver",
issn = "1976-2283",
publisher = "Joe Bok Chung",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A pilot study of endoscopic submucosal dissection using an endoscopic assistive robot in a porcine stomach model

AU - Kim, Byung Gon

AU - Choi, Hyuk Soon

AU - Park, Sei Hoon

AU - Hong, Jun Ho

AU - Lee, Jung Min

AU - Kim, Seung Han

AU - Chun, Hoon-Jai

AU - Hong, Daehie

AU - Keum, Bora

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background/Aims: Endoscopic assistive devices have been developed to reduce the complexity and improve the safety of surgeries involving the use of endoscopes. We developed an assistive robotic arm for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and evaluated its efficiency and safety in this in vitro pilot study. Methods: ESD was performed using an auxiliary transluminal endoscopic robot. An in vitro test bed replicating the intra-abdominal environment and pig stomachs were used for the experiment. Participants were divided into skilled operators and unskilled operators. Each group performed ESD 10 times by using both conventional and robot-assisted methods. The perforation incidence, operation time, and resected mucous membrane size were measured. Results: For the conventional method, significant differences were noted between skilled and unskilled operators regarding operation time (11.3 minutes vs 26.7 minutes) and perforation incidence (0/10 vs 6/10). Unskilled operators showed a large decrease in the perforation incidence with the robot-assisted method (conventional method vs robot-assisted method, 6/10 vs 1/10). However, the operation time did not differ between the conventional and robotassisted methods. On the other hand, skilled operators did not show differences in the operation time and perforation incidence between the conventional and robot-assisted methods. Among both skilled and unskilled operators, the operation time decreased with the robot-assisted method as the experiment proceeded. Conclusions: The surgical safety of unskilled operators greatly improved with robotic assistance. Thus, our assistive robotic arm was beneficial for ESD. Our findings suggest that endoscopic assistive robots have positive effects on surgical safety.

AB - Background/Aims: Endoscopic assistive devices have been developed to reduce the complexity and improve the safety of surgeries involving the use of endoscopes. We developed an assistive robotic arm for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and evaluated its efficiency and safety in this in vitro pilot study. Methods: ESD was performed using an auxiliary transluminal endoscopic robot. An in vitro test bed replicating the intra-abdominal environment and pig stomachs were used for the experiment. Participants were divided into skilled operators and unskilled operators. Each group performed ESD 10 times by using both conventional and robot-assisted methods. The perforation incidence, operation time, and resected mucous membrane size were measured. Results: For the conventional method, significant differences were noted between skilled and unskilled operators regarding operation time (11.3 minutes vs 26.7 minutes) and perforation incidence (0/10 vs 6/10). Unskilled operators showed a large decrease in the perforation incidence with the robot-assisted method (conventional method vs robot-assisted method, 6/10 vs 1/10). However, the operation time did not differ between the conventional and robotassisted methods. On the other hand, skilled operators did not show differences in the operation time and perforation incidence between the conventional and robot-assisted methods. Among both skilled and unskilled operators, the operation time decreased with the robot-assisted method as the experiment proceeded. Conclusions: The surgical safety of unskilled operators greatly improved with robotic assistance. Thus, our assistive robotic arm was beneficial for ESD. Our findings suggest that endoscopic assistive robots have positive effects on surgical safety.

KW - Computer-assisted

KW - Endoscopic mucosal resection

KW - Endoscopy

KW - Pilot projects

KW - Surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069288882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069288882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5009/gnl18370

DO - 10.5009/gnl18370

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 402

EP - 408

JO - Gut and Liver

JF - Gut and Liver

SN - 1976-2283

IS - 4

ER -