A randomized controlled trial of compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Sung Oh Hwang, Kyoung Chul Cha, Kyuseok Kim, You Hwan Jo, Sung Phil Chung, Je Sung You, Jonghwan Shin, Hui Jai Lee, Yoo Seok Park, Seunghwan Kim, Sang Cheon Choi, Eun Jung Park, Won Young Kim, Dong Woo Seo, Sungwoo Moon, Gapsu Han, Han Sung Choi, Hyunggoo Kang, Seung Min Park, Woon Yong KwonEunhee Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with 120 compressions per minute (CPM) to CPR with 100 CPM in patients with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We randomly assigned patients with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest into two groups upon arrival to the emergency department (ED). The patients received manual CPR either with 100 CPM (CPR-100 group) or 120 CPM (CPR-120 group). The primary outcome measure was sustained restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The secondary outcome measures were survival discharge from the hospital, one-month survival, and one-month survival with good functional status. Of 470 patients with cardiac arrest, 136 patients in the CPR-100 group and 156 patients in the CPR-120 group were included in the final analysis. A total of 69 patients (50.7%) in the CPR-100 group and 67 patients (42.9%) in the CPR-120 group had ROSC (absolute difference, 7.8% points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.7 to 19.2%; P=0.183). The rates of survival discharge from the hospital, one-month survival, and one-month survival with good functional status were not different between the two groups (16.9% vs. 12.8%, P=0.325; 12.5% vs. 6.4%, P=0.073; 5.9% vs. 2.6%, P=0.154, respectively). We did not find differences in the resuscitation outcomes between those who received CPR with 100 CPM and those with 120 CPM. However, a large trial is warranted, with adequate power to confirm a statistically non-significant trend toward superiority of CPR with 100 CPM. (Clinical Trial Registration Information: www.cris.nih.go.kr, cris.nih.go.kr number, KCT0000231)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1491-1498
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Korean Medical Science
Volume31
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Randomized Controlled Trials
Survival
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Heart Arrest
Resuscitation
Hospital Emergency Service
Survival Rate
Clinical Trials
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • Basic life support
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Hwang, S. O., Cha, K. C., Kim, K., Jo, Y. H., Chung, S. P., You, J. S., ... Choi, E. (2016). A randomized controlled trial of compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 31(9), 1491-1498. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1491

A randomized controlled trial of compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. / Hwang, Sung Oh; Cha, Kyoung Chul; Kim, Kyuseok; Jo, You Hwan; Chung, Sung Phil; You, Je Sung; Shin, Jonghwan; Lee, Hui Jai; Park, Yoo Seok; Kim, Seunghwan; Choi, Sang Cheon; Park, Eun Jung; Kim, Won Young; Seo, Dong Woo; Moon, Sungwoo; Han, Gapsu; Choi, Han Sung; Kang, Hyunggoo; Park, Seung Min; Kwon, Woon Yong; Choi, Eunhee.

In: Journal of Korean Medical Science, Vol. 31, No. 9, 01.01.2016, p. 1491-1498.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hwang, SO, Cha, KC, Kim, K, Jo, YH, Chung, SP, You, JS, Shin, J, Lee, HJ, Park, YS, Kim, S, Choi, SC, Park, EJ, Kim, WY, Seo, DW, Moon, S, Han, G, Choi, HS, Kang, H, Park, SM, Kwon, WY & Choi, E 2016, 'A randomized controlled trial of compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation', Journal of Korean Medical Science, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1491-1498. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1491
Hwang, Sung Oh ; Cha, Kyoung Chul ; Kim, Kyuseok ; Jo, You Hwan ; Chung, Sung Phil ; You, Je Sung ; Shin, Jonghwan ; Lee, Hui Jai ; Park, Yoo Seok ; Kim, Seunghwan ; Choi, Sang Cheon ; Park, Eun Jung ; Kim, Won Young ; Seo, Dong Woo ; Moon, Sungwoo ; Han, Gapsu ; Choi, Han Sung ; Kang, Hyunggoo ; Park, Seung Min ; Kwon, Woon Yong ; Choi, Eunhee. / A randomized controlled trial of compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In: Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 9. pp. 1491-1498.
@article{2e9da2eb9f4c423a9e7d1f1e9e6e2673,
title = "A randomized controlled trial of compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation",
abstract = "The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with 120 compressions per minute (CPM) to CPR with 100 CPM in patients with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We randomly assigned patients with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest into two groups upon arrival to the emergency department (ED). The patients received manual CPR either with 100 CPM (CPR-100 group) or 120 CPM (CPR-120 group). The primary outcome measure was sustained restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The secondary outcome measures were survival discharge from the hospital, one-month survival, and one-month survival with good functional status. Of 470 patients with cardiac arrest, 136 patients in the CPR-100 group and 156 patients in the CPR-120 group were included in the final analysis. A total of 69 patients (50.7{\%}) in the CPR-100 group and 67 patients (42.9{\%}) in the CPR-120 group had ROSC (absolute difference, 7.8{\%} points; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], -3.7 to 19.2{\%}; P=0.183). The rates of survival discharge from the hospital, one-month survival, and one-month survival with good functional status were not different between the two groups (16.9{\%} vs. 12.8{\%}, P=0.325; 12.5{\%} vs. 6.4{\%}, P=0.073; 5.9{\%} vs. 2.6{\%}, P=0.154, respectively). We did not find differences in the resuscitation outcomes between those who received CPR with 100 CPM and those with 120 CPM. However, a large trial is warranted, with adequate power to confirm a statistically non-significant trend toward superiority of CPR with 100 CPM. (Clinical Trial Registration Information: www.cris.nih.go.kr, cris.nih.go.kr number, KCT0000231)",
keywords = "Basic life support, Cardiac arrest, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation",
author = "Hwang, {Sung Oh} and Cha, {Kyoung Chul} and Kyuseok Kim and Jo, {You Hwan} and Chung, {Sung Phil} and You, {Je Sung} and Jonghwan Shin and Lee, {Hui Jai} and Park, {Yoo Seok} and Seunghwan Kim and Choi, {Sang Cheon} and Park, {Eun Jung} and Kim, {Won Young} and Seo, {Dong Woo} and Sungwoo Moon and Gapsu Han and Choi, {Han Sung} and Hyunggoo Kang and Park, {Seung Min} and Kwon, {Woon Yong} and Eunhee Choi",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1491",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "1491--1498",
journal = "Journal of Korean Medical Science",
issn = "1011-8934",
publisher = "Korean Academy of Medical Science",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomized controlled trial of compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

AU - Hwang, Sung Oh

AU - Cha, Kyoung Chul

AU - Kim, Kyuseok

AU - Jo, You Hwan

AU - Chung, Sung Phil

AU - You, Je Sung

AU - Shin, Jonghwan

AU - Lee, Hui Jai

AU - Park, Yoo Seok

AU - Kim, Seunghwan

AU - Choi, Sang Cheon

AU - Park, Eun Jung

AU - Kim, Won Young

AU - Seo, Dong Woo

AU - Moon, Sungwoo

AU - Han, Gapsu

AU - Choi, Han Sung

AU - Kang, Hyunggoo

AU - Park, Seung Min

AU - Kwon, Woon Yong

AU - Choi, Eunhee

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with 120 compressions per minute (CPM) to CPR with 100 CPM in patients with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We randomly assigned patients with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest into two groups upon arrival to the emergency department (ED). The patients received manual CPR either with 100 CPM (CPR-100 group) or 120 CPM (CPR-120 group). The primary outcome measure was sustained restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The secondary outcome measures were survival discharge from the hospital, one-month survival, and one-month survival with good functional status. Of 470 patients with cardiac arrest, 136 patients in the CPR-100 group and 156 patients in the CPR-120 group were included in the final analysis. A total of 69 patients (50.7%) in the CPR-100 group and 67 patients (42.9%) in the CPR-120 group had ROSC (absolute difference, 7.8% points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.7 to 19.2%; P=0.183). The rates of survival discharge from the hospital, one-month survival, and one-month survival with good functional status were not different between the two groups (16.9% vs. 12.8%, P=0.325; 12.5% vs. 6.4%, P=0.073; 5.9% vs. 2.6%, P=0.154, respectively). We did not find differences in the resuscitation outcomes between those who received CPR with 100 CPM and those with 120 CPM. However, a large trial is warranted, with adequate power to confirm a statistically non-significant trend toward superiority of CPR with 100 CPM. (Clinical Trial Registration Information: www.cris.nih.go.kr, cris.nih.go.kr number, KCT0000231)

AB - The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with 120 compressions per minute (CPM) to CPR with 100 CPM in patients with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We randomly assigned patients with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest into two groups upon arrival to the emergency department (ED). The patients received manual CPR either with 100 CPM (CPR-100 group) or 120 CPM (CPR-120 group). The primary outcome measure was sustained restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The secondary outcome measures were survival discharge from the hospital, one-month survival, and one-month survival with good functional status. Of 470 patients with cardiac arrest, 136 patients in the CPR-100 group and 156 patients in the CPR-120 group were included in the final analysis. A total of 69 patients (50.7%) in the CPR-100 group and 67 patients (42.9%) in the CPR-120 group had ROSC (absolute difference, 7.8% points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.7 to 19.2%; P=0.183). The rates of survival discharge from the hospital, one-month survival, and one-month survival with good functional status were not different between the two groups (16.9% vs. 12.8%, P=0.325; 12.5% vs. 6.4%, P=0.073; 5.9% vs. 2.6%, P=0.154, respectively). We did not find differences in the resuscitation outcomes between those who received CPR with 100 CPM and those with 120 CPM. However, a large trial is warranted, with adequate power to confirm a statistically non-significant trend toward superiority of CPR with 100 CPM. (Clinical Trial Registration Information: www.cris.nih.go.kr, cris.nih.go.kr number, KCT0000231)

KW - Basic life support

KW - Cardiac arrest

KW - Cardiopulmonary resuscitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983554820&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983554820&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1491

DO - 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1491

M3 - Article

C2 - 27510396

AN - SCOPUS:84983554820

VL - 31

SP - 1491

EP - 1498

JO - Journal of Korean Medical Science

JF - Journal of Korean Medical Science

SN - 1011-8934

IS - 9

ER -