A requirements negotiation model based on multi-criteria analysis

H. In, D. Olson, T. Rodgers

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many software projects have failed because their requirements were poorly negotiated among stakeholders. Requirements negotiation is more critical than other factors such as tools, process maturity, and design methods. The WinWin negotiation model successfully supports general requirements negotiation. However, making decisions to evaluate alternatives is still an ad-hoc process. This poster presents a systematic model, called "Multi-Criteria Preference Analysis Requirements Negotiation (MPARN)" to assist stakeholders to evaluate, negotiate, and agree upon alternatives among stakeholders using multi-criteria preference analysis techniques.

Original languageEnglish
Pages312-313
Number of pages2
Publication statusPublished - 2001
Event5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering - Toronto, Ont, Canada
Duration: 2001 Aug 272001 Aug 31

Other

Other5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering
CountryCanada
CityToronto, Ont
Period01/8/2701/8/31

Keywords

  • Conflict resolution
  • Multi-criteria preference analysis
  • Requirements negotiation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Software
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A requirements negotiation model based on multi-criteria analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    In, H., Olson, D., & Rodgers, T. (2001). A requirements negotiation model based on multi-criteria analysis. 312-313. Paper presented at 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, Toronto, Ont, Canada.