A requirements negotiation model based on multi-criteria analysis

Hoh In, D. Olson, T. Rodgers

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many software projects have failed because their requirements were poorly negotiated among stakeholders. Requirements negotiation is more critical than other factors such as tools, process maturity, and design methods. The WinWin negotiation model successfully supports general requirements negotiation. However, making decisions to evaluate alternatives is still an ad-hoc process. This poster presents a systematic model, called "Multi-Criteria Preference Analysis Requirements Negotiation (MPARN)" to assist stakeholders to evaluate, negotiate, and agree upon alternatives among stakeholders using multi-criteria preference analysis techniques.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering
Pages312-313
Number of pages2
Publication statusPublished - 2001 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes
Event5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering - Toronto, Ont, Canada
Duration: 2001 Aug 272001 Aug 31

Other

Other5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering
CountryCanada
CityToronto, Ont
Period01/8/2701/8/31

Fingerprint

Decision making

Keywords

  • Conflict resolution
  • Multi-criteria preference analysis
  • Requirements negotiation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Software
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

In, H., Olson, D., & Rodgers, T. (2001). A requirements negotiation model based on multi-criteria analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (pp. 312-313)

A requirements negotiation model based on multi-criteria analysis. / In, Hoh; Olson, D.; Rodgers, T.

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering. 2001. p. 312-313.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

In, H, Olson, D & Rodgers, T 2001, A requirements negotiation model based on multi-criteria analysis. in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering. pp. 312-313, 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, Toronto, Ont, Canada, 01/8/27.
In H, Olson D, Rodgers T. A requirements negotiation model based on multi-criteria analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering. 2001. p. 312-313
In, Hoh ; Olson, D. ; Rodgers, T. / A requirements negotiation model based on multi-criteria analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering. 2001. pp. 312-313
@inproceedings{2626fe7e2b0246d0aeeff815fc6eae44,
title = "A requirements negotiation model based on multi-criteria analysis",
abstract = "Many software projects have failed because their requirements were poorly negotiated among stakeholders. Requirements negotiation is more critical than other factors such as tools, process maturity, and design methods. The WinWin negotiation model successfully supports general requirements negotiation. However, making decisions to evaluate alternatives is still an ad-hoc process. This poster presents a systematic model, called {"}Multi-Criteria Preference Analysis Requirements Negotiation (MPARN){"} to assist stakeholders to evaluate, negotiate, and agree upon alternatives among stakeholders using multi-criteria preference analysis techniques.",
keywords = "Conflict resolution, Multi-criteria preference analysis, Requirements negotiation",
author = "Hoh In and D. Olson and T. Rodgers",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
pages = "312--313",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - A requirements negotiation model based on multi-criteria analysis

AU - In, Hoh

AU - Olson, D.

AU - Rodgers, T.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Many software projects have failed because their requirements were poorly negotiated among stakeholders. Requirements negotiation is more critical than other factors such as tools, process maturity, and design methods. The WinWin negotiation model successfully supports general requirements negotiation. However, making decisions to evaluate alternatives is still an ad-hoc process. This poster presents a systematic model, called "Multi-Criteria Preference Analysis Requirements Negotiation (MPARN)" to assist stakeholders to evaluate, negotiate, and agree upon alternatives among stakeholders using multi-criteria preference analysis techniques.

AB - Many software projects have failed because their requirements were poorly negotiated among stakeholders. Requirements negotiation is more critical than other factors such as tools, process maturity, and design methods. The WinWin negotiation model successfully supports general requirements negotiation. However, making decisions to evaluate alternatives is still an ad-hoc process. This poster presents a systematic model, called "Multi-Criteria Preference Analysis Requirements Negotiation (MPARN)" to assist stakeholders to evaluate, negotiate, and agree upon alternatives among stakeholders using multi-criteria preference analysis techniques.

KW - Conflict resolution

KW - Multi-criteria preference analysis

KW - Requirements negotiation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034835863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034835863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:0034835863

SP - 312

EP - 313

BT - Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering

ER -