Abstract
Many software projects have failed because their requirements were poorly negotiated among stakeholders. Requirements negotiation is more critical than other factors such as tools, process maturity, and design methods. The WinWin negotiation model successfully supports general requirements negotiation. However, making decisions to evaluate alternatives is still an ad-hoc process. This poster presents a systematic model, called "Multi-Criteria Preference Analysis Requirements Negotiation (MPARN)" to assist stakeholders to evaluate, negotiate, and agree upon alternatives among stakeholders using multi-criteria preference analysis techniques.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering |
| Pages | 312-313 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2001 Jan 1 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Event | 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering - Toronto, Ont, Canada Duration: 2001 Aug 27 → 2001 Aug 31 |
Other
| Other | 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering |
|---|---|
| Country | Canada |
| City | Toronto, Ont |
| Period | 01/8/27 → 01/8/31 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Conflict resolution
- Multi-criteria preference analysis
- Requirements negotiation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Hardware and Architecture
- Software
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Cite this
A requirements negotiation model based on multi-criteria analysis. / In, Hoh; Olson, D.; Rodgers, T.
Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering. 2001. p. 312-313.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution
}
TY - GEN
T1 - A requirements negotiation model based on multi-criteria analysis
AU - In, Hoh
AU - Olson, D.
AU - Rodgers, T.
PY - 2001/1/1
Y1 - 2001/1/1
N2 - Many software projects have failed because their requirements were poorly negotiated among stakeholders. Requirements negotiation is more critical than other factors such as tools, process maturity, and design methods. The WinWin negotiation model successfully supports general requirements negotiation. However, making decisions to evaluate alternatives is still an ad-hoc process. This poster presents a systematic model, called "Multi-Criteria Preference Analysis Requirements Negotiation (MPARN)" to assist stakeholders to evaluate, negotiate, and agree upon alternatives among stakeholders using multi-criteria preference analysis techniques.
AB - Many software projects have failed because their requirements were poorly negotiated among stakeholders. Requirements negotiation is more critical than other factors such as tools, process maturity, and design methods. The WinWin negotiation model successfully supports general requirements negotiation. However, making decisions to evaluate alternatives is still an ad-hoc process. This poster presents a systematic model, called "Multi-Criteria Preference Analysis Requirements Negotiation (MPARN)" to assist stakeholders to evaluate, negotiate, and agree upon alternatives among stakeholders using multi-criteria preference analysis techniques.
KW - Conflict resolution
KW - Multi-criteria preference analysis
KW - Requirements negotiation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034835863&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034835863&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:0034835863
SP - 312
EP - 313
BT - Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering
ER -