Abstract
Many software projects have failed because their requirements were poorly negotiated among stakeholders. Requirements negotiation is more critical than other factors such as tools, process maturity, and design methods. The WinWin negotiation model successfully supports general requirements negotiation. However, making decisions to evaluate alternatives is still an ad-hoc process. This poster presents a systematic model, called "Multi-Criteria Preference Analysis Requirements Negotiation (MPARN)" to assist stakeholders to evaluate, negotiate, and agree upon alternatives among stakeholders using multi-criteria preference analysis techniques.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 312-313 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2001 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Event | 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering - Toronto, Ont, Canada Duration: 2001 Aug 27 → 2001 Aug 31 |
Other
| Other | 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Canada |
| City | Toronto, Ont |
| Period | 01/8/27 → 01/8/31 |
Keywords
- Conflict resolution
- Multi-criteria preference analysis
- Requirements negotiation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Hardware and Architecture
- Software
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering