A review on robotic surgery in rectal cancer

Zairul Azwan Mohd Azman, Seon Hahn Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Robotic surgery has the upper hand when compared to the laparoscopic approach in terms of superior visualisation, flexibility in movement, steadiness and accessibility to confined anatomical spaces. Nevertheless, limitations still exist with regards to cost, reduced tactile sensation, time-consuming setup and a significant learning curve to achieve. Although studies have shown better or at least comparable outcomes between the robotic and laparoscopic approach, the limitations mentioned result in poor penetrance among centres and surgeons. Advancements in robotic surgery technology and attaining the acquired skillset will translate into better clinical outcomes for patients.

Original languageEnglish
JournalTranslational Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume2016
Issue numberMAR
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Robotics
Rectal Neoplasms
Confined Spaces
Learning Curve
Hypesthesia
Penetrance
Touch
Technology
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Minimally invasive surgery (MIS)
  • Rectal dissection
  • Robotic surgery
  • Robotic-assisted surgery
  • Total mesorectal excision (TME)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

A review on robotic surgery in rectal cancer. / Azman, Zairul Azwan Mohd; Kim, Seon Hahn.

In: Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vol. 2016, No. MAR, 01.01.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{d9fd263575b34754b581e1319ecb2bd5,
title = "A review on robotic surgery in rectal cancer",
abstract = "Robotic surgery has the upper hand when compared to the laparoscopic approach in terms of superior visualisation, flexibility in movement, steadiness and accessibility to confined anatomical spaces. Nevertheless, limitations still exist with regards to cost, reduced tactile sensation, time-consuming setup and a significant learning curve to achieve. Although studies have shown better or at least comparable outcomes between the robotic and laparoscopic approach, the limitations mentioned result in poor penetrance among centres and surgeons. Advancements in robotic surgery technology and attaining the acquired skillset will translate into better clinical outcomes for patients.",
keywords = "Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), Rectal dissection, Robotic surgery, Robotic-assisted surgery, Total mesorectal excision (TME)",
author = "Azman, {Zairul Azwan Mohd} and Kim, {Seon Hahn}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.21037/tgh.2016.03.16",
language = "English",
volume = "2016",
journal = "Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology",
issn = "2224-476X",
publisher = "AME Publishing Company",
number = "MAR",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review on robotic surgery in rectal cancer

AU - Azman, Zairul Azwan Mohd

AU - Kim, Seon Hahn

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Robotic surgery has the upper hand when compared to the laparoscopic approach in terms of superior visualisation, flexibility in movement, steadiness and accessibility to confined anatomical spaces. Nevertheless, limitations still exist with regards to cost, reduced tactile sensation, time-consuming setup and a significant learning curve to achieve. Although studies have shown better or at least comparable outcomes between the robotic and laparoscopic approach, the limitations mentioned result in poor penetrance among centres and surgeons. Advancements in robotic surgery technology and attaining the acquired skillset will translate into better clinical outcomes for patients.

AB - Robotic surgery has the upper hand when compared to the laparoscopic approach in terms of superior visualisation, flexibility in movement, steadiness and accessibility to confined anatomical spaces. Nevertheless, limitations still exist with regards to cost, reduced tactile sensation, time-consuming setup and a significant learning curve to achieve. Although studies have shown better or at least comparable outcomes between the robotic and laparoscopic approach, the limitations mentioned result in poor penetrance among centres and surgeons. Advancements in robotic surgery technology and attaining the acquired skillset will translate into better clinical outcomes for patients.

KW - Minimally invasive surgery (MIS)

KW - Rectal dissection

KW - Robotic surgery

KW - Robotic-assisted surgery

KW - Total mesorectal excision (TME)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006823184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006823184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21037/tgh.2016.03.16

DO - 10.21037/tgh.2016.03.16

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85006823184

VL - 2016

JO - Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology

JF - Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology

SN - 2224-476X

IS - MAR

ER -