A stakeholder analysis of community-led collaboration to reduce health inequity in a deprived neighbourhood in South Korea

Hyun Hee Heo, Woojin Jeong, Xian Hua Che, Haejoo Chung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Intersectoral collaboration amongst health and other sectors, as well as between government and non-governmental organisations, has been highlighted as a way to improve health equity. We used a mixed-methods approach to assess collaborative relationships between multiple government sectors and civil society and to suggest possible health promotion interventions and policy alternatives for the urban poor in deprived neighborhoods. A total of 18 participants involved in health promotion interventions and policy processes related to the inner-city area of Seoul were recruited using purposive sampling methods. Participants included stakeholders working for or engaging in governments (3), public health care institutions (5), social service providers (3), community-based organisations (CBOs) (4) and faith-based organisations (3). We conducted semi-structured, one-on-one interviews and then collected survey data. Quantitative data were analysed using social network analysis, and qualitative data were analysed through iterative and consensus processes. The social network analysis indicated that a CBO plays the most substantial role in sharing and controlling informational resources to promote health. A stakeholder analysis showed that the CBO neutrally and negatively viewed the possibility of collaboration with other stakeholders. Three themes related to challenges to intersectoral collaboration emerged: (1) lack of trust and communication, (2) need of a coalition with a committed leading actor for future collaboration and (3) organisational and political silos within and across public sectors. Increased understanding of the current status of and challenges to collaboration can inform the planning and implementation of complex intervening strategies and policies tailored to vulnerable people in deprived neighborhoods. Community-led collaborative actions empower people in marginalised communities to envision a healthier community.

Original languageEnglish
JournalGlobal Health Promotion
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2018 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Republic of Korea
Health
Organizations
Health Policy
Health Promotion
Social Support
Public Sector
Social Work
Consensus
Public Health
Communication
Interviews
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • capacity building (including competencies)
  • collaboration
  • community action
  • community-based organisation
  • health inequity
  • intersectoral collaboration
  • partnerships

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

A stakeholder analysis of community-led collaboration to reduce health inequity in a deprived neighbourhood in South Korea. / Heo, Hyun Hee; Jeong, Woojin; Che, Xian Hua; Chung, Haejoo.

In: Global Health Promotion, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{15b822ef7bc84f6ca84795da7c013bbe,
title = "A stakeholder analysis of community-led collaboration to reduce health inequity in a deprived neighbourhood in South Korea",
abstract = "Intersectoral collaboration amongst health and other sectors, as well as between government and non-governmental organisations, has been highlighted as a way to improve health equity. We used a mixed-methods approach to assess collaborative relationships between multiple government sectors and civil society and to suggest possible health promotion interventions and policy alternatives for the urban poor in deprived neighborhoods. A total of 18 participants involved in health promotion interventions and policy processes related to the inner-city area of Seoul were recruited using purposive sampling methods. Participants included stakeholders working for or engaging in governments (3), public health care institutions (5), social service providers (3), community-based organisations (CBOs) (4) and faith-based organisations (3). We conducted semi-structured, one-on-one interviews and then collected survey data. Quantitative data were analysed using social network analysis, and qualitative data were analysed through iterative and consensus processes. The social network analysis indicated that a CBO plays the most substantial role in sharing and controlling informational resources to promote health. A stakeholder analysis showed that the CBO neutrally and negatively viewed the possibility of collaboration with other stakeholders. Three themes related to challenges to intersectoral collaboration emerged: (1) lack of trust and communication, (2) need of a coalition with a committed leading actor for future collaboration and (3) organisational and political silos within and across public sectors. Increased understanding of the current status of and challenges to collaboration can inform the planning and implementation of complex intervening strategies and policies tailored to vulnerable people in deprived neighborhoods. Community-led collaborative actions empower people in marginalised communities to envision a healthier community.",
keywords = "capacity building (including competencies), collaboration, community action, community-based organisation, health inequity, intersectoral collaboration, partnerships",
author = "Heo, {Hyun Hee} and Woojin Jeong and Che, {Xian Hua} and Haejoo Chung",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1757975918791517",
language = "English",
journal = "Global Health Promotion",
issn = "1757-9759",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A stakeholder analysis of community-led collaboration to reduce health inequity in a deprived neighbourhood in South Korea

AU - Heo, Hyun Hee

AU - Jeong, Woojin

AU - Che, Xian Hua

AU - Chung, Haejoo

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Intersectoral collaboration amongst health and other sectors, as well as between government and non-governmental organisations, has been highlighted as a way to improve health equity. We used a mixed-methods approach to assess collaborative relationships between multiple government sectors and civil society and to suggest possible health promotion interventions and policy alternatives for the urban poor in deprived neighborhoods. A total of 18 participants involved in health promotion interventions and policy processes related to the inner-city area of Seoul were recruited using purposive sampling methods. Participants included stakeholders working for or engaging in governments (3), public health care institutions (5), social service providers (3), community-based organisations (CBOs) (4) and faith-based organisations (3). We conducted semi-structured, one-on-one interviews and then collected survey data. Quantitative data were analysed using social network analysis, and qualitative data were analysed through iterative and consensus processes. The social network analysis indicated that a CBO plays the most substantial role in sharing and controlling informational resources to promote health. A stakeholder analysis showed that the CBO neutrally and negatively viewed the possibility of collaboration with other stakeholders. Three themes related to challenges to intersectoral collaboration emerged: (1) lack of trust and communication, (2) need of a coalition with a committed leading actor for future collaboration and (3) organisational and political silos within and across public sectors. Increased understanding of the current status of and challenges to collaboration can inform the planning and implementation of complex intervening strategies and policies tailored to vulnerable people in deprived neighborhoods. Community-led collaborative actions empower people in marginalised communities to envision a healthier community.

AB - Intersectoral collaboration amongst health and other sectors, as well as between government and non-governmental organisations, has been highlighted as a way to improve health equity. We used a mixed-methods approach to assess collaborative relationships between multiple government sectors and civil society and to suggest possible health promotion interventions and policy alternatives for the urban poor in deprived neighborhoods. A total of 18 participants involved in health promotion interventions and policy processes related to the inner-city area of Seoul were recruited using purposive sampling methods. Participants included stakeholders working for or engaging in governments (3), public health care institutions (5), social service providers (3), community-based organisations (CBOs) (4) and faith-based organisations (3). We conducted semi-structured, one-on-one interviews and then collected survey data. Quantitative data were analysed using social network analysis, and qualitative data were analysed through iterative and consensus processes. The social network analysis indicated that a CBO plays the most substantial role in sharing and controlling informational resources to promote health. A stakeholder analysis showed that the CBO neutrally and negatively viewed the possibility of collaboration with other stakeholders. Three themes related to challenges to intersectoral collaboration emerged: (1) lack of trust and communication, (2) need of a coalition with a committed leading actor for future collaboration and (3) organisational and political silos within and across public sectors. Increased understanding of the current status of and challenges to collaboration can inform the planning and implementation of complex intervening strategies and policies tailored to vulnerable people in deprived neighborhoods. Community-led collaborative actions empower people in marginalised communities to envision a healthier community.

KW - capacity building (including competencies)

KW - collaboration

KW - community action

KW - community-based organisation

KW - health inequity

KW - intersectoral collaboration

KW - partnerships

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059072257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059072257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1757975918791517

DO - 10.1177/1757975918791517

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85059072257

JO - Global Health Promotion

JF - Global Health Promotion

SN - 1757-9759

ER -