Abstract
Generally design wind load and responses are evaluated with the force balance test. Several limitations, however, are included into the force balance test method. Profiles of mean and background wind loads are assumed, and only peak values of wind loads and responses are evaluated by the force balance test. Therefore, shapes of total wind loads and acceleration responses might be improperly evaluated for peculiar types of buildings. In this study, expected problems in evaluating design wind loads and responses due to such limitations in the force balance test method were investigated by comparing evaluation results of the force balance test with actual wind loads and responses derived by advanced conditional sampling (ACS) method for a slender structure and a shear wall type tall building.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | EACWE 2005 - 4th European and African Conference on Wind Engineering |
| Pages | 172-173 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 Dec 1 |
| Event | 4th European and African Conference on Wind Engineering, EACWE 2005 - Prague, Czech Republic Duration: 2005 Jul 11 → 2005 Jul 15 |
Other
| Other | 4th European and African Conference on Wind Engineering, EACWE 2005 |
|---|---|
| Country | Czech Republic |
| City | Prague |
| Period | 05/7/11 → 05/7/15 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Cite this
A study on comparisons of design wind loads and responses for tall buildings with actual wind load distributions and responses. / Kim, Dae Young; Kim, Ji Young; Lee, Myung Ho; Kim, Sang Dae.
EACWE 2005 - 4th European and African Conference on Wind Engineering. 2005. p. 172-173.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution
}
TY - GEN
T1 - A study on comparisons of design wind loads and responses for tall buildings with actual wind load distributions and responses
AU - Kim, Dae Young
AU - Kim, Ji Young
AU - Lee, Myung Ho
AU - Kim, Sang Dae
PY - 2005/12/1
Y1 - 2005/12/1
N2 - Generally design wind load and responses are evaluated with the force balance test. Several limitations, however, are included into the force balance test method. Profiles of mean and background wind loads are assumed, and only peak values of wind loads and responses are evaluated by the force balance test. Therefore, shapes of total wind loads and acceleration responses might be improperly evaluated for peculiar types of buildings. In this study, expected problems in evaluating design wind loads and responses due to such limitations in the force balance test method were investigated by comparing evaluation results of the force balance test with actual wind loads and responses derived by advanced conditional sampling (ACS) method for a slender structure and a shear wall type tall building.
AB - Generally design wind load and responses are evaluated with the force balance test. Several limitations, however, are included into the force balance test method. Profiles of mean and background wind loads are assumed, and only peak values of wind loads and responses are evaluated by the force balance test. Therefore, shapes of total wind loads and acceleration responses might be improperly evaluated for peculiar types of buildings. In this study, expected problems in evaluating design wind loads and responses due to such limitations in the force balance test method were investigated by comparing evaluation results of the force balance test with actual wind loads and responses derived by advanced conditional sampling (ACS) method for a slender structure and a shear wall type tall building.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875200268&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875200268&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 8086246264
SN - 9788086246260
SP - 172
EP - 173
BT - EACWE 2005 - 4th European and African Conference on Wind Engineering
ER -