A weighted, multi-method approach for accurate basin-wide streamflow estimation in an ungauged watershed

Christopher L. Shope, Svenja Bartsch, Kiyong Kim, Bomchul Kim, John Tenhunen, Stefan Peiffer, Ji Hyung Park, Yong Sik Ok, Jan Fleckenstein, Thomas Koellner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

River discharge is a commonly measured hydrologic variable; however, estimate uncertainty is often higher than acceptable limits. To quantify method limitations and spatiotemporal variability, a multi-year hydrologic flow partitioning investigation was completed under monsoonal conditions in the ungauged complex terrain of the Haean Catchment, South Korea. Our results indicate that sediment transport from a single annual monsoonal event can significantly modify the channel cross-sectional area resulting in inaccurate stage-discharge rating curves. We compare six discharge measurement methods at 13 locations that vary in slope from 1% to 80%, with discharge ranging up to four orders in magnitude, which enabled us to weight the accuracy of each method over a specific range in discharge. The most accurate discharge estimation methods are the weir, the acoustic Doppler current profiler, and the in-stream velocity area method; however, under certain conditions each of these methods is less desirable than other methods. The uncertainty in the three methods is on average 0.4%, 4.7%, and 6.1% of the total discharge, respectively. The accuracy of the discharge estimates has a direct influence on the characterization of basin-wide hydrologic partitioning, which can lead to significant variability in sediment erosion rates and nutrient fate and transport.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)72-82
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Hydrology
Volume494
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jun 8
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

streamflow
watershed
basin
partitioning
rating curve
weir
complex terrain
Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler
measurement method
estimation method
method
erosion rate
river discharge
sediment transport
catchment
nutrient
sediment

Keywords

  • Baseflow
  • Discharge
  • Korea
  • River
  • TERRECO
  • Topography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Shope, C. L., Bartsch, S., Kim, K., Kim, B., Tenhunen, J., Peiffer, S., ... Koellner, T. (2013). A weighted, multi-method approach for accurate basin-wide streamflow estimation in an ungauged watershed. Journal of Hydrology, 494, 72-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.035

A weighted, multi-method approach for accurate basin-wide streamflow estimation in an ungauged watershed. / Shope, Christopher L.; Bartsch, Svenja; Kim, Kiyong; Kim, Bomchul; Tenhunen, John; Peiffer, Stefan; Park, Ji Hyung; Ok, Yong Sik; Fleckenstein, Jan; Koellner, Thomas.

In: Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 494, 08.06.2013, p. 72-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shope, CL, Bartsch, S, Kim, K, Kim, B, Tenhunen, J, Peiffer, S, Park, JH, Ok, YS, Fleckenstein, J & Koellner, T 2013, 'A weighted, multi-method approach for accurate basin-wide streamflow estimation in an ungauged watershed', Journal of Hydrology, vol. 494, pp. 72-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.035
Shope, Christopher L. ; Bartsch, Svenja ; Kim, Kiyong ; Kim, Bomchul ; Tenhunen, John ; Peiffer, Stefan ; Park, Ji Hyung ; Ok, Yong Sik ; Fleckenstein, Jan ; Koellner, Thomas. / A weighted, multi-method approach for accurate basin-wide streamflow estimation in an ungauged watershed. In: Journal of Hydrology. 2013 ; Vol. 494. pp. 72-82.
@article{001cba42842248ca85c784fed0439669,
title = "A weighted, multi-method approach for accurate basin-wide streamflow estimation in an ungauged watershed",
abstract = "River discharge is a commonly measured hydrologic variable; however, estimate uncertainty is often higher than acceptable limits. To quantify method limitations and spatiotemporal variability, a multi-year hydrologic flow partitioning investigation was completed under monsoonal conditions in the ungauged complex terrain of the Haean Catchment, South Korea. Our results indicate that sediment transport from a single annual monsoonal event can significantly modify the channel cross-sectional area resulting in inaccurate stage-discharge rating curves. We compare six discharge measurement methods at 13 locations that vary in slope from 1{\%} to 80{\%}, with discharge ranging up to four orders in magnitude, which enabled us to weight the accuracy of each method over a specific range in discharge. The most accurate discharge estimation methods are the weir, the acoustic Doppler current profiler, and the in-stream velocity area method; however, under certain conditions each of these methods is less desirable than other methods. The uncertainty in the three methods is on average 0.4{\%}, 4.7{\%}, and 6.1{\%} of the total discharge, respectively. The accuracy of the discharge estimates has a direct influence on the characterization of basin-wide hydrologic partitioning, which can lead to significant variability in sediment erosion rates and nutrient fate and transport.",
keywords = "Baseflow, Discharge, Korea, River, TERRECO, Topography",
author = "Shope, {Christopher L.} and Svenja Bartsch and Kiyong Kim and Bomchul Kim and John Tenhunen and Stefan Peiffer and Park, {Ji Hyung} and Ok, {Yong Sik} and Jan Fleckenstein and Thomas Koellner",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.035",
language = "English",
volume = "494",
pages = "72--82",
journal = "Journal of Hydrology",
issn = "0022-1694",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A weighted, multi-method approach for accurate basin-wide streamflow estimation in an ungauged watershed

AU - Shope, Christopher L.

AU - Bartsch, Svenja

AU - Kim, Kiyong

AU - Kim, Bomchul

AU - Tenhunen, John

AU - Peiffer, Stefan

AU - Park, Ji Hyung

AU - Ok, Yong Sik

AU - Fleckenstein, Jan

AU - Koellner, Thomas

PY - 2013/6/8

Y1 - 2013/6/8

N2 - River discharge is a commonly measured hydrologic variable; however, estimate uncertainty is often higher than acceptable limits. To quantify method limitations and spatiotemporal variability, a multi-year hydrologic flow partitioning investigation was completed under monsoonal conditions in the ungauged complex terrain of the Haean Catchment, South Korea. Our results indicate that sediment transport from a single annual monsoonal event can significantly modify the channel cross-sectional area resulting in inaccurate stage-discharge rating curves. We compare six discharge measurement methods at 13 locations that vary in slope from 1% to 80%, with discharge ranging up to four orders in magnitude, which enabled us to weight the accuracy of each method over a specific range in discharge. The most accurate discharge estimation methods are the weir, the acoustic Doppler current profiler, and the in-stream velocity area method; however, under certain conditions each of these methods is less desirable than other methods. The uncertainty in the three methods is on average 0.4%, 4.7%, and 6.1% of the total discharge, respectively. The accuracy of the discharge estimates has a direct influence on the characterization of basin-wide hydrologic partitioning, which can lead to significant variability in sediment erosion rates and nutrient fate and transport.

AB - River discharge is a commonly measured hydrologic variable; however, estimate uncertainty is often higher than acceptable limits. To quantify method limitations and spatiotemporal variability, a multi-year hydrologic flow partitioning investigation was completed under monsoonal conditions in the ungauged complex terrain of the Haean Catchment, South Korea. Our results indicate that sediment transport from a single annual monsoonal event can significantly modify the channel cross-sectional area resulting in inaccurate stage-discharge rating curves. We compare six discharge measurement methods at 13 locations that vary in slope from 1% to 80%, with discharge ranging up to four orders in magnitude, which enabled us to weight the accuracy of each method over a specific range in discharge. The most accurate discharge estimation methods are the weir, the acoustic Doppler current profiler, and the in-stream velocity area method; however, under certain conditions each of these methods is less desirable than other methods. The uncertainty in the three methods is on average 0.4%, 4.7%, and 6.1% of the total discharge, respectively. The accuracy of the discharge estimates has a direct influence on the characterization of basin-wide hydrologic partitioning, which can lead to significant variability in sediment erosion rates and nutrient fate and transport.

KW - Baseflow

KW - Discharge

KW - Korea

KW - River

KW - TERRECO

KW - Topography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878452454&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878452454&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.035

DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.035

M3 - Article

VL - 494

SP - 72

EP - 82

JO - Journal of Hydrology

JF - Journal of Hydrology

SN - 0022-1694

ER -