Accumulation, capacity utilisation and distribution

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines three approaches to the process of accumulation which are based on the ‘Keynesian premise’: the ʼneo-Keynesian’, the ‘Kaleckian’ and the ‘Sraffian’. Making some criticisms of the first two from the viewpoint of the third and from a certain formal/conceptual perspective, we propose a synthetic model which is free from these criticisms and in which the adjustment of savings to investment in the long period is achieved through all the three routes emphasised separately by these approaches: changes in the long-period degree of utilisation; changes in the ʼnormal’ distribution of income; and variations in the size of productive capacity. The key to the synthesis is the hypothesis that, in the long period, the ʼnormal’ degree of utilisation is endogenously determined to coincide with the average level through mutual influence effected by investment in the short period. Our synthetic model, like the first two approaches, is in the line of steady-state analysis, but in a way compatible with the ‘Keynesian premise’.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-101
Number of pages15
JournalContributions to Political Economy
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1997 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

capacity utilization
criticism
utilization
savings
income
Long period
Capacity utilization
Criticism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Accumulation, capacity utilisation and distribution. / Park, Man Seop.

In: Contributions to Political Economy, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.01.1997, p. 87-101.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0d8f10bc1ee24df6992ad89ac72d2b7d,
title = "Accumulation, capacity utilisation and distribution",
abstract = "This paper examines three approaches to the process of accumulation which are based on the ‘Keynesian premise’: the ʼneo-Keynesian’, the ‘Kaleckian’ and the ‘Sraffian’. Making some criticisms of the first two from the viewpoint of the third and from a certain formal/conceptual perspective, we propose a synthetic model which is free from these criticisms and in which the adjustment of savings to investment in the long period is achieved through all the three routes emphasised separately by these approaches: changes in the long-period degree of utilisation; changes in the ʼnormal’ distribution of income; and variations in the size of productive capacity. The key to the synthesis is the hypothesis that, in the long period, the ʼnormal’ degree of utilisation is endogenously determined to coincide with the average level through mutual influence effected by investment in the short period. Our synthetic model, like the first two approaches, is in the line of steady-state analysis, but in a way compatible with the ‘Keynesian premise’.",
author = "Park, {Man Seop}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordjournals.cpe.a014058",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "87--101",
journal = "Contributions to Political Economy",
issn = "0277-5921",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accumulation, capacity utilisation and distribution

AU - Park, Man Seop

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - This paper examines three approaches to the process of accumulation which are based on the ‘Keynesian premise’: the ʼneo-Keynesian’, the ‘Kaleckian’ and the ‘Sraffian’. Making some criticisms of the first two from the viewpoint of the third and from a certain formal/conceptual perspective, we propose a synthetic model which is free from these criticisms and in which the adjustment of savings to investment in the long period is achieved through all the three routes emphasised separately by these approaches: changes in the long-period degree of utilisation; changes in the ʼnormal’ distribution of income; and variations in the size of productive capacity. The key to the synthesis is the hypothesis that, in the long period, the ʼnormal’ degree of utilisation is endogenously determined to coincide with the average level through mutual influence effected by investment in the short period. Our synthetic model, like the first two approaches, is in the line of steady-state analysis, but in a way compatible with the ‘Keynesian premise’.

AB - This paper examines three approaches to the process of accumulation which are based on the ‘Keynesian premise’: the ʼneo-Keynesian’, the ‘Kaleckian’ and the ‘Sraffian’. Making some criticisms of the first two from the viewpoint of the third and from a certain formal/conceptual perspective, we propose a synthetic model which is free from these criticisms and in which the adjustment of savings to investment in the long period is achieved through all the three routes emphasised separately by these approaches: changes in the long-period degree of utilisation; changes in the ʼnormal’ distribution of income; and variations in the size of productive capacity. The key to the synthesis is the hypothesis that, in the long period, the ʼnormal’ degree of utilisation is endogenously determined to coincide with the average level through mutual influence effected by investment in the short period. Our synthetic model, like the first two approaches, is in the line of steady-state analysis, but in a way compatible with the ‘Keynesian premise’.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0345649873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0345649873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.cpe.a014058

DO - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.cpe.a014058

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0345649873

VL - 16

SP - 87

EP - 101

JO - Contributions to Political Economy

JF - Contributions to Political Economy

SN - 0277-5921

IS - 1

ER -