Acellular dermal matrix as a core strut for projection in nipple reconstruction: Approaches for three different methods of breast reconstruction

Gui Yong Park, Eul Sik Yoon, Hee Eun Cho, Byung-Il Lee, Seung Ha Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The objective of this paper was to describe a novel technique for improving the maintenance of nipple projection in primary nipple reconstruction by using acellular dermal matrix as a strut in one of three different configurations, according to the method of prior breast reconstruction. The struts were designed to best fill the different types of dead spaces in nipple reconstruction depending on the breast reconstruction method. Methods A total of 50 primary nipple reconstructions were performed between May 2012 and May 2015. The prior breast reconstruction methods were latissimus dorsi (LD) flap (28 cases), transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap (10 cases), or tissue expander/ implant (12 cases). The nipple reconstruction technique involved the use of local flaps, including the C-V flap or star flap. A 1× 2-cm acellular dermal matrix was placed into the core with O-, I-, and L-shaped struts for prior LD, TRAM, and expander/implant methods, respectively. The projection of the reconstructed nipple was measured at the time of surgery and at 3, 6, and 9 months postoperatively. Results The nine-month average maintenance of nipple projection was 73.0% ±9.67% for the LD flap group using an O-strut, 72.0%±11.53% for the TRAM flap group using an I-strut, and 69.0%±10.82% for the tissue expander/implant group using an L-strut. There were no cases of infection, wound dehiscence, or flap necrosis. Conclusions The application of an acellular dermal matrix with a different kind of strut for each of 3 breast reconstruction methods is an effective addition to current techniques for improving the maintenance of long-term projection in primary nipple reconstruction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)424-429
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Plastic Surgery
Volume43
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Acellular Dermis
Nipples
Mammaplasty
Rectus Abdominis
Superficial Back Muscles
Tissue Expansion Devices
Myocutaneous Flap
Maintenance
Wound Infection
Necrosis

Keywords

  • Acellular dermis
  • Mammaplasty
  • Nipples

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

@article{edd07d21564a476b9fb165e7607c774b,
title = "Acellular dermal matrix as a core strut for projection in nipple reconstruction: Approaches for three different methods of breast reconstruction",
abstract = "Background The objective of this paper was to describe a novel technique for improving the maintenance of nipple projection in primary nipple reconstruction by using acellular dermal matrix as a strut in one of three different configurations, according to the method of prior breast reconstruction. The struts were designed to best fill the different types of dead spaces in nipple reconstruction depending on the breast reconstruction method. Methods A total of 50 primary nipple reconstructions were performed between May 2012 and May 2015. The prior breast reconstruction methods were latissimus dorsi (LD) flap (28 cases), transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap (10 cases), or tissue expander/ implant (12 cases). The nipple reconstruction technique involved the use of local flaps, including the C-V flap or star flap. A 1× 2-cm acellular dermal matrix was placed into the core with O-, I-, and L-shaped struts for prior LD, TRAM, and expander/implant methods, respectively. The projection of the reconstructed nipple was measured at the time of surgery and at 3, 6, and 9 months postoperatively. Results The nine-month average maintenance of nipple projection was 73.0{\%} ±9.67{\%} for the LD flap group using an O-strut, 72.0{\%}±11.53{\%} for the TRAM flap group using an I-strut, and 69.0{\%}±10.82{\%} for the tissue expander/implant group using an L-strut. There were no cases of infection, wound dehiscence, or flap necrosis. Conclusions The application of an acellular dermal matrix with a different kind of strut for each of 3 breast reconstruction methods is an effective addition to current techniques for improving the maintenance of long-term projection in primary nipple reconstruction.",
keywords = "Acellular dermis, Mammaplasty, Nipples",
author = "Park, {Gui Yong} and Yoon, {Eul Sik} and Cho, {Hee Eun} and Byung-Il Lee and Park, {Seung Ha}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5999/aps.2016.43.5.424",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "424--429",
journal = "Archives of Plastic Surgery",
issn = "2234-6163",
publisher = "Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acellular dermal matrix as a core strut for projection in nipple reconstruction

T2 - Approaches for three different methods of breast reconstruction

AU - Park, Gui Yong

AU - Yoon, Eul Sik

AU - Cho, Hee Eun

AU - Lee, Byung-Il

AU - Park, Seung Ha

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Background The objective of this paper was to describe a novel technique for improving the maintenance of nipple projection in primary nipple reconstruction by using acellular dermal matrix as a strut in one of three different configurations, according to the method of prior breast reconstruction. The struts were designed to best fill the different types of dead spaces in nipple reconstruction depending on the breast reconstruction method. Methods A total of 50 primary nipple reconstructions were performed between May 2012 and May 2015. The prior breast reconstruction methods were latissimus dorsi (LD) flap (28 cases), transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap (10 cases), or tissue expander/ implant (12 cases). The nipple reconstruction technique involved the use of local flaps, including the C-V flap or star flap. A 1× 2-cm acellular dermal matrix was placed into the core with O-, I-, and L-shaped struts for prior LD, TRAM, and expander/implant methods, respectively. The projection of the reconstructed nipple was measured at the time of surgery and at 3, 6, and 9 months postoperatively. Results The nine-month average maintenance of nipple projection was 73.0% ±9.67% for the LD flap group using an O-strut, 72.0%±11.53% for the TRAM flap group using an I-strut, and 69.0%±10.82% for the tissue expander/implant group using an L-strut. There were no cases of infection, wound dehiscence, or flap necrosis. Conclusions The application of an acellular dermal matrix with a different kind of strut for each of 3 breast reconstruction methods is an effective addition to current techniques for improving the maintenance of long-term projection in primary nipple reconstruction.

AB - Background The objective of this paper was to describe a novel technique for improving the maintenance of nipple projection in primary nipple reconstruction by using acellular dermal matrix as a strut in one of three different configurations, according to the method of prior breast reconstruction. The struts were designed to best fill the different types of dead spaces in nipple reconstruction depending on the breast reconstruction method. Methods A total of 50 primary nipple reconstructions were performed between May 2012 and May 2015. The prior breast reconstruction methods were latissimus dorsi (LD) flap (28 cases), transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap (10 cases), or tissue expander/ implant (12 cases). The nipple reconstruction technique involved the use of local flaps, including the C-V flap or star flap. A 1× 2-cm acellular dermal matrix was placed into the core with O-, I-, and L-shaped struts for prior LD, TRAM, and expander/implant methods, respectively. The projection of the reconstructed nipple was measured at the time of surgery and at 3, 6, and 9 months postoperatively. Results The nine-month average maintenance of nipple projection was 73.0% ±9.67% for the LD flap group using an O-strut, 72.0%±11.53% for the TRAM flap group using an I-strut, and 69.0%±10.82% for the tissue expander/implant group using an L-strut. There were no cases of infection, wound dehiscence, or flap necrosis. Conclusions The application of an acellular dermal matrix with a different kind of strut for each of 3 breast reconstruction methods is an effective addition to current techniques for improving the maintenance of long-term projection in primary nipple reconstruction.

KW - Acellular dermis

KW - Mammaplasty

KW - Nipples

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988958618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988958618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5999/aps.2016.43.5.424

DO - 10.5999/aps.2016.43.5.424

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84988958618

VL - 43

SP - 424

EP - 429

JO - Archives of Plastic Surgery

JF - Archives of Plastic Surgery

SN - 2234-6163

IS - 5

ER -