Acid Extraction Overestimates the Total Fe(II) in the Presence of Iron (Hydr)oxide and Sulfide Minerals

Man Jae Kwon, Jung Seok Yang, Moo Joon Shim, Maxim I. Boyanov, Kenneth M. Kemner, Edward J. O'Loughlin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Acid extraction followed by a colorimetric assay is a widely used approach for the determination of the total Fe(II) in samples from suboxic and anoxic environments. Under sulfidogenic conditions, these samples can contain both metal sulfides and iron (hydr)oxides. Our comparisons between 0.5 N HCl extraction and X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) analysis of systems containing 40 mM Fe(III) as specific (hydr)oxides and 10 mM FeS showed that the presence of sulfide can result in significant overestimation of the total Fe(II) by acid extraction. The total Fe(II) determined by XAFS was consistent with the added FeS. However, the total Fe(II) determined by extraction was significantly higher and dependent on the nature of the Fe(III) (hydr)oxides; the rates and extent of Fe(II) production were higher with ferrihydrite and lepidocrocite than with goethite. Total Fe(II) concentrations determined following acid extraction might be overestimated when iron (hydr)oxides and sulfide minerals are present in samples.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)310-314
Number of pages5
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology Letters
Volume1
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Jul 8
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Oxide minerals
Sulfide minerals
iron sulfide
Sulfides
Iron oxides
iron oxide
Minerals
Oxides
Acids
acid
mineral
X-Rays
X ray absorption
Systems Analysis
sulfide
oxide
lepidocrocite
Metals
ferrihydrite
goethite

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Pollution
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Acid Extraction Overestimates the Total Fe(II) in the Presence of Iron (Hydr)oxide and Sulfide Minerals. / Kwon, Man Jae; Yang, Jung Seok; Shim, Moo Joon; Boyanov, Maxim I.; Kemner, Kenneth M.; O'Loughlin, Edward J.

In: Environmental Science and Technology Letters, Vol. 1, No. 7, 08.07.2014, p. 310-314.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kwon, Man Jae ; Yang, Jung Seok ; Shim, Moo Joon ; Boyanov, Maxim I. ; Kemner, Kenneth M. ; O'Loughlin, Edward J. / Acid Extraction Overestimates the Total Fe(II) in the Presence of Iron (Hydr)oxide and Sulfide Minerals. In: Environmental Science and Technology Letters. 2014 ; Vol. 1, No. 7. pp. 310-314.
@article{a4f50f0ec6fb42e4b2a98bf443152fda,
title = "Acid Extraction Overestimates the Total Fe(II) in the Presence of Iron (Hydr)oxide and Sulfide Minerals",
abstract = "Acid extraction followed by a colorimetric assay is a widely used approach for the determination of the total Fe(II) in samples from suboxic and anoxic environments. Under sulfidogenic conditions, these samples can contain both metal sulfides and iron (hydr)oxides. Our comparisons between 0.5 N HCl extraction and X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) analysis of systems containing 40 mM Fe(III) as specific (hydr)oxides and 10 mM FeS showed that the presence of sulfide can result in significant overestimation of the total Fe(II) by acid extraction. The total Fe(II) determined by XAFS was consistent with the added FeS. However, the total Fe(II) determined by extraction was significantly higher and dependent on the nature of the Fe(III) (hydr)oxides; the rates and extent of Fe(II) production were higher with ferrihydrite and lepidocrocite than with goethite. Total Fe(II) concentrations determined following acid extraction might be overestimated when iron (hydr)oxides and sulfide minerals are present in samples.",
author = "Kwon, {Man Jae} and Yang, {Jung Seok} and Shim, {Moo Joon} and Boyanov, {Maxim I.} and Kemner, {Kenneth M.} and O'Loughlin, {Edward J.}",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1021/ez500152h",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "310--314",
journal = "Environmental Science and Technology Letters",
issn = "2328-8930",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acid Extraction Overestimates the Total Fe(II) in the Presence of Iron (Hydr)oxide and Sulfide Minerals

AU - Kwon, Man Jae

AU - Yang, Jung Seok

AU - Shim, Moo Joon

AU - Boyanov, Maxim I.

AU - Kemner, Kenneth M.

AU - O'Loughlin, Edward J.

PY - 2014/7/8

Y1 - 2014/7/8

N2 - Acid extraction followed by a colorimetric assay is a widely used approach for the determination of the total Fe(II) in samples from suboxic and anoxic environments. Under sulfidogenic conditions, these samples can contain both metal sulfides and iron (hydr)oxides. Our comparisons between 0.5 N HCl extraction and X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) analysis of systems containing 40 mM Fe(III) as specific (hydr)oxides and 10 mM FeS showed that the presence of sulfide can result in significant overestimation of the total Fe(II) by acid extraction. The total Fe(II) determined by XAFS was consistent with the added FeS. However, the total Fe(II) determined by extraction was significantly higher and dependent on the nature of the Fe(III) (hydr)oxides; the rates and extent of Fe(II) production were higher with ferrihydrite and lepidocrocite than with goethite. Total Fe(II) concentrations determined following acid extraction might be overestimated when iron (hydr)oxides and sulfide minerals are present in samples.

AB - Acid extraction followed by a colorimetric assay is a widely used approach for the determination of the total Fe(II) in samples from suboxic and anoxic environments. Under sulfidogenic conditions, these samples can contain both metal sulfides and iron (hydr)oxides. Our comparisons between 0.5 N HCl extraction and X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) analysis of systems containing 40 mM Fe(III) as specific (hydr)oxides and 10 mM FeS showed that the presence of sulfide can result in significant overestimation of the total Fe(II) by acid extraction. The total Fe(II) determined by XAFS was consistent with the added FeS. However, the total Fe(II) determined by extraction was significantly higher and dependent on the nature of the Fe(III) (hydr)oxides; the rates and extent of Fe(II) production were higher with ferrihydrite and lepidocrocite than with goethite. Total Fe(II) concentrations determined following acid extraction might be overestimated when iron (hydr)oxides and sulfide minerals are present in samples.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969260509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969260509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/ez500152h

DO - 10.1021/ez500152h

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 310

EP - 314

JO - Environmental Science and Technology Letters

JF - Environmental Science and Technology Letters

SN - 2328-8930

IS - 7

ER -