Aesthetic responses to urban greenway trail environments

Jinhyung Chon, C. Scott Shafer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ways people perceive greenway trails in urban environments are not well studied. Trail layout and aspects of maintenance and design of trails in urban areas would benefit from better knowledge of how potential users perceive these places and what might encourage or discourage their use. The purpose of this study was to examine the relative influence of aesthetic response dimensions on the likeability of greenway trail scenes in an urban environment. A web-based 'virtual tour' was used to elicit responses to scenes of urban greenway environments in downtown Houston and Austin, Texas, USA. The 211 subjects who participated in the study were selected from an undergraduate student population. Participants viewed the scenes and responded to the survey in a controlled computer laboratory. Perceptions of the greenways supported the aesthetic dimensions that Nasar has suggested for broader urban environments. Our analysis resulted in the identification of five dimensions of aesthetic response to the greenway scenes that were interpreted as: maintenance, distinctiveness, naturalness, pleasantness and arousal. These represented both cognitive and affective responses to the environment and all five dimensions were significant positive predictors of the likeability of greenway scenes. The dimension of pleasantness had the greatest influence on likeability and maintenance had the least. The implications of the findings for urban design related to greenway trails and future research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-104
Number of pages22
JournalLandscape Research
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Feb 10

Fingerprint

esthetics
aesthetics
naturalness
urban design
city center
layout
urban area
student

Keywords

  • Aesthetic response dimensions
  • Landscape design
  • Likeability
  • Urban greenway trail
  • Virtual tour
  • Visual quality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Aesthetic responses to urban greenway trail environments. / Chon, Jinhyung; Shafer, C. Scott.

In: Landscape Research, Vol. 34, No. 1, 10.02.2009, p. 83-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chon, Jinhyung ; Shafer, C. Scott. / Aesthetic responses to urban greenway trail environments. In: Landscape Research. 2009 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 83-104.
@article{563584d67a8e4ffd90d726692c19bc72,
title = "Aesthetic responses to urban greenway trail environments",
abstract = "The ways people perceive greenway trails in urban environments are not well studied. Trail layout and aspects of maintenance and design of trails in urban areas would benefit from better knowledge of how potential users perceive these places and what might encourage or discourage their use. The purpose of this study was to examine the relative influence of aesthetic response dimensions on the likeability of greenway trail scenes in an urban environment. A web-based 'virtual tour' was used to elicit responses to scenes of urban greenway environments in downtown Houston and Austin, Texas, USA. The 211 subjects who participated in the study were selected from an undergraduate student population. Participants viewed the scenes and responded to the survey in a controlled computer laboratory. Perceptions of the greenways supported the aesthetic dimensions that Nasar has suggested for broader urban environments. Our analysis resulted in the identification of five dimensions of aesthetic response to the greenway scenes that were interpreted as: maintenance, distinctiveness, naturalness, pleasantness and arousal. These represented both cognitive and affective responses to the environment and all five dimensions were significant positive predictors of the likeability of greenway scenes. The dimension of pleasantness had the greatest influence on likeability and maintenance had the least. The implications of the findings for urban design related to greenway trails and future research are discussed.",
keywords = "Aesthetic response dimensions, Landscape design, Likeability, Urban greenway trail, Virtual tour, Visual quality",
author = "Jinhyung Chon and Shafer, {C. Scott}",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1080/01426390802591429",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "83--104",
journal = "Landscape Research",
issn = "0142-6397",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aesthetic responses to urban greenway trail environments

AU - Chon, Jinhyung

AU - Shafer, C. Scott

PY - 2009/2/10

Y1 - 2009/2/10

N2 - The ways people perceive greenway trails in urban environments are not well studied. Trail layout and aspects of maintenance and design of trails in urban areas would benefit from better knowledge of how potential users perceive these places and what might encourage or discourage their use. The purpose of this study was to examine the relative influence of aesthetic response dimensions on the likeability of greenway trail scenes in an urban environment. A web-based 'virtual tour' was used to elicit responses to scenes of urban greenway environments in downtown Houston and Austin, Texas, USA. The 211 subjects who participated in the study were selected from an undergraduate student population. Participants viewed the scenes and responded to the survey in a controlled computer laboratory. Perceptions of the greenways supported the aesthetic dimensions that Nasar has suggested for broader urban environments. Our analysis resulted in the identification of five dimensions of aesthetic response to the greenway scenes that were interpreted as: maintenance, distinctiveness, naturalness, pleasantness and arousal. These represented both cognitive and affective responses to the environment and all five dimensions were significant positive predictors of the likeability of greenway scenes. The dimension of pleasantness had the greatest influence on likeability and maintenance had the least. The implications of the findings for urban design related to greenway trails and future research are discussed.

AB - The ways people perceive greenway trails in urban environments are not well studied. Trail layout and aspects of maintenance and design of trails in urban areas would benefit from better knowledge of how potential users perceive these places and what might encourage or discourage their use. The purpose of this study was to examine the relative influence of aesthetic response dimensions on the likeability of greenway trail scenes in an urban environment. A web-based 'virtual tour' was used to elicit responses to scenes of urban greenway environments in downtown Houston and Austin, Texas, USA. The 211 subjects who participated in the study were selected from an undergraduate student population. Participants viewed the scenes and responded to the survey in a controlled computer laboratory. Perceptions of the greenways supported the aesthetic dimensions that Nasar has suggested for broader urban environments. Our analysis resulted in the identification of five dimensions of aesthetic response to the greenway scenes that were interpreted as: maintenance, distinctiveness, naturalness, pleasantness and arousal. These represented both cognitive and affective responses to the environment and all five dimensions were significant positive predictors of the likeability of greenway scenes. The dimension of pleasantness had the greatest influence on likeability and maintenance had the least. The implications of the findings for urban design related to greenway trails and future research are discussed.

KW - Aesthetic response dimensions

KW - Landscape design

KW - Likeability

KW - Urban greenway trail

KW - Virtual tour

KW - Visual quality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59449084257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=59449084257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01426390802591429

DO - 10.1080/01426390802591429

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:59449084257

VL - 34

SP - 83

EP - 104

JO - Landscape Research

JF - Landscape Research

SN - 0142-6397

IS - 1

ER -