Alternative Choices for Anterolateral Thigh Flaps Lacking Suitable Perforators: A Systematic Review

Sik Namgoong, Young Don Yoon, Ki Hyun Yoo, Seung-Kyu Han, Woo-Kyung Kim, Eun-Sang Dhong

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap has become a predominant option in the field of reconstruction. However, some difficulties in harvesting flap exist due to the anatomical variability of the perforators. Reports have provided solutions for unreliable perforators. Although numerous cases that showed successful conversion to tensor fasciae latae (TFL) flap or anteromedial thigh (AMT) flap have been reported in the literature, none fully addresses the reliability of the perforators that have been described to date. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review to compare the reliability of the TFL flap with that of the AMT flap when an ALT flap perforator is not suitable. Methods A systematic review of the MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library electronic databases was performed to compare the characteristics of TFL and AMT flap perforators. Results A total of 13 articles were included for review. The mean number of TFL perforators varied from 1.41 to 3.17 per thigh. The mean number of AMT perforators was between 0.59 and 1.3 per thigh. The cumulative assessment of the clinical and anatomical studies showed 456 perforators in 180 TFL flaps (mean, 2.53) and 145 perforators in 162 AMT flaps (mean, 0.90). The mean pedicle length of the TFL and AMT flaps ranged from 7.0 to 9.59 cm and from 7.4 to 11.0 cm, respectively. The mean perforator diameter was similar in both flaps. Conclusion Currently available literature suggests that the TFL flap may be a more reliable alternative when adequate perforators are not found for ALT flap harvest.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)465-471
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Volume34
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Apr 1

Fingerprint

Thigh
Fascia Lata
Perforator Flap
PubMed
MEDLINE
Libraries
Databases

Keywords

  • fascia lata
  • free tissue flaps
  • lower extremity
  • microvascular
  • perforator flap
  • thigh

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Alternative Choices for Anterolateral Thigh Flaps Lacking Suitable Perforators : A Systematic Review. / Namgoong, Sik; Yoon, Young Don; Yoo, Ki Hyun; Han, Seung-Kyu; Kim, Woo-Kyung; Dhong, Eun-Sang.

In: Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Vol. 34, No. 7, 01.04.2018, p. 465-471.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{c35dfc5f79c540829a991771add1a39f,
title = "Alternative Choices for Anterolateral Thigh Flaps Lacking Suitable Perforators: A Systematic Review",
abstract = "Background The anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap has become a predominant option in the field of reconstruction. However, some difficulties in harvesting flap exist due to the anatomical variability of the perforators. Reports have provided solutions for unreliable perforators. Although numerous cases that showed successful conversion to tensor fasciae latae (TFL) flap or anteromedial thigh (AMT) flap have been reported in the literature, none fully addresses the reliability of the perforators that have been described to date. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review to compare the reliability of the TFL flap with that of the AMT flap when an ALT flap perforator is not suitable. Methods A systematic review of the MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library electronic databases was performed to compare the characteristics of TFL and AMT flap perforators. Results A total of 13 articles were included for review. The mean number of TFL perforators varied from 1.41 to 3.17 per thigh. The mean number of AMT perforators was between 0.59 and 1.3 per thigh. The cumulative assessment of the clinical and anatomical studies showed 456 perforators in 180 TFL flaps (mean, 2.53) and 145 perforators in 162 AMT flaps (mean, 0.90). The mean pedicle length of the TFL and AMT flaps ranged from 7.0 to 9.59 cm and from 7.4 to 11.0 cm, respectively. The mean perforator diameter was similar in both flaps. Conclusion Currently available literature suggests that the TFL flap may be a more reliable alternative when adequate perforators are not found for ALT flap harvest.",
keywords = "fascia lata, free tissue flaps, lower extremity, microvascular, perforator flap, thigh",
author = "Sik Namgoong and Yoon, {Young Don} and Yoo, {Ki Hyun} and Seung-Kyu Han and Woo-Kyung Kim and Eun-Sang Dhong",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1055/s-0038-1639366",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "465--471",
journal = "Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery",
issn = "0743-684X",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alternative Choices for Anterolateral Thigh Flaps Lacking Suitable Perforators

T2 - A Systematic Review

AU - Namgoong, Sik

AU - Yoon, Young Don

AU - Yoo, Ki Hyun

AU - Han, Seung-Kyu

AU - Kim, Woo-Kyung

AU - Dhong, Eun-Sang

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Background The anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap has become a predominant option in the field of reconstruction. However, some difficulties in harvesting flap exist due to the anatomical variability of the perforators. Reports have provided solutions for unreliable perforators. Although numerous cases that showed successful conversion to tensor fasciae latae (TFL) flap or anteromedial thigh (AMT) flap have been reported in the literature, none fully addresses the reliability of the perforators that have been described to date. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review to compare the reliability of the TFL flap with that of the AMT flap when an ALT flap perforator is not suitable. Methods A systematic review of the MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library electronic databases was performed to compare the characteristics of TFL and AMT flap perforators. Results A total of 13 articles were included for review. The mean number of TFL perforators varied from 1.41 to 3.17 per thigh. The mean number of AMT perforators was between 0.59 and 1.3 per thigh. The cumulative assessment of the clinical and anatomical studies showed 456 perforators in 180 TFL flaps (mean, 2.53) and 145 perforators in 162 AMT flaps (mean, 0.90). The mean pedicle length of the TFL and AMT flaps ranged from 7.0 to 9.59 cm and from 7.4 to 11.0 cm, respectively. The mean perforator diameter was similar in both flaps. Conclusion Currently available literature suggests that the TFL flap may be a more reliable alternative when adequate perforators are not found for ALT flap harvest.

AB - Background The anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap has become a predominant option in the field of reconstruction. However, some difficulties in harvesting flap exist due to the anatomical variability of the perforators. Reports have provided solutions for unreliable perforators. Although numerous cases that showed successful conversion to tensor fasciae latae (TFL) flap or anteromedial thigh (AMT) flap have been reported in the literature, none fully addresses the reliability of the perforators that have been described to date. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review to compare the reliability of the TFL flap with that of the AMT flap when an ALT flap perforator is not suitable. Methods A systematic review of the MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library electronic databases was performed to compare the characteristics of TFL and AMT flap perforators. Results A total of 13 articles were included for review. The mean number of TFL perforators varied from 1.41 to 3.17 per thigh. The mean number of AMT perforators was between 0.59 and 1.3 per thigh. The cumulative assessment of the clinical and anatomical studies showed 456 perforators in 180 TFL flaps (mean, 2.53) and 145 perforators in 162 AMT flaps (mean, 0.90). The mean pedicle length of the TFL and AMT flaps ranged from 7.0 to 9.59 cm and from 7.4 to 11.0 cm, respectively. The mean perforator diameter was similar in both flaps. Conclusion Currently available literature suggests that the TFL flap may be a more reliable alternative when adequate perforators are not found for ALT flap harvest.

KW - fascia lata

KW - free tissue flaps

KW - lower extremity

KW - microvascular

KW - perforator flap

KW - thigh

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044918216&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044918216&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0038-1639366

DO - 10.1055/s-0038-1639366

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29605956

AN - SCOPUS:85044918216

VL - 34

SP - 465

EP - 471

JO - Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery

JF - Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery

SN - 0743-684X

IS - 7

ER -