Alternatives to P value: Confidence interval and effect size

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The previous articles of the Statistical Round in the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology posed a strong enquiry on the issue of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST). P values lie at the core of NHST and are used to classify all treatments into two groups: “has a significant effect” or “does not have a significant effect.” NHST is frequently criticized for its misinterpretation of relationships and limitations in assessing practical importance. It has now provoked criticism for its limited use in merely separating treatments that “have a significant effect” from others that do not. Effect sizes and CIs expand the approach to statistical thinking. These attractive estimates facilitate authors and readers to discriminate between a multitude of treatment effects. Through this article, I have illustrated the concept and estimating principles of effect sizes and CIs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)555-562
Number of pages8
JournalKorean Journal of Anesthesiology
Volume69
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Anesthesiology
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • Confidence intervals
  • Effect sizes
  • P value

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Alternatives to P value : Confidence interval and effect size. / Lee, Dong Kyu.

In: Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, Vol. 69, No. 6, 01.12.2016, p. 555-562.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{377630817c4c46e898dd9e4a347a0261,
title = "Alternatives to P value: Confidence interval and effect size",
abstract = "The previous articles of the Statistical Round in the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology posed a strong enquiry on the issue of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST). P values lie at the core of NHST and are used to classify all treatments into two groups: “has a significant effect” or “does not have a significant effect.” NHST is frequently criticized for its misinterpretation of relationships and limitations in assessing practical importance. It has now provoked criticism for its limited use in merely separating treatments that “have a significant effect” from others that do not. Effect sizes and CIs expand the approach to statistical thinking. These attractive estimates facilitate authors and readers to discriminate between a multitude of treatment effects. Through this article, I have illustrated the concept and estimating principles of effect sizes and CIs.",
keywords = "Confidence intervals, Effect sizes, P value",
author = "Lee, {Dong Kyu}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4097/kjae.2016.69.6.555",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "555--562",
journal = "Korean Journal of Anesthesiology",
issn = "2005-6419",
publisher = "Korean Society of Anesthesiologists",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alternatives to P value

T2 - Confidence interval and effect size

AU - Lee, Dong Kyu

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - The previous articles of the Statistical Round in the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology posed a strong enquiry on the issue of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST). P values lie at the core of NHST and are used to classify all treatments into two groups: “has a significant effect” or “does not have a significant effect.” NHST is frequently criticized for its misinterpretation of relationships and limitations in assessing practical importance. It has now provoked criticism for its limited use in merely separating treatments that “have a significant effect” from others that do not. Effect sizes and CIs expand the approach to statistical thinking. These attractive estimates facilitate authors and readers to discriminate between a multitude of treatment effects. Through this article, I have illustrated the concept and estimating principles of effect sizes and CIs.

AB - The previous articles of the Statistical Round in the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology posed a strong enquiry on the issue of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST). P values lie at the core of NHST and are used to classify all treatments into two groups: “has a significant effect” or “does not have a significant effect.” NHST is frequently criticized for its misinterpretation of relationships and limitations in assessing practical importance. It has now provoked criticism for its limited use in merely separating treatments that “have a significant effect” from others that do not. Effect sizes and CIs expand the approach to statistical thinking. These attractive estimates facilitate authors and readers to discriminate between a multitude of treatment effects. Through this article, I have illustrated the concept and estimating principles of effect sizes and CIs.

KW - Confidence intervals

KW - Effect sizes

KW - P value

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002873125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85002873125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4097/kjae.2016.69.6.555

DO - 10.4097/kjae.2016.69.6.555

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85002873125

VL - 69

SP - 555

EP - 562

JO - Korean Journal of Anesthesiology

JF - Korean Journal of Anesthesiology

SN - 2005-6419

IS - 6

ER -