An articulatory phonology account of preferred consonant-vowel combinations

Sara Giulivi, D. H. Whalen, Louis M. Goldstein, Hosung Nam, Andrea G. Levitt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Certain consonant/vowel combinations (labial/central, coronal/front, velar/back) are more frequent in babbling as well as, to a lesser extent, in adult language than chance would dictate. The "Frame then Content" (F/C) hypothesis (Davis & MacNeilage, 1994) attributes this pattern to biome-chanical vocal-tract biases that change as infants mature. Articulatory Phonology (AP; Browman & Goldstein, 1989) attributes preferences to demands placed on shared articulators. F/C implies that preferences will diminish as articulatory control increases, while AP does not. Here, babbling from children at 6, 9, and 12 months in English, French, and Mandarin environments was examined. There was no developmental trend in CV preferences, although older ages exhibited greater articulatory control. A perception test showed no evidence of bias toward hearing the preferred combinations. Modeling using articulatory synthesis found limited support for F/C but more for AP, including data not originally encompassed in F/C. AP thus provides an alternative biomechanical explanation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)202-225
Number of pages24
JournalLanguage Learning and Development
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Jul 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

phonology
trend
infant
language
evidence
Consonant
Articulatory Phonology
Babbling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

An articulatory phonology account of preferred consonant-vowel combinations. / Giulivi, Sara; Whalen, D. H.; Goldstein, Louis M.; Nam, Hosung; Levitt, Andrea G.

In: Language Learning and Development, Vol. 7, No. 3, 01.07.2011, p. 202-225.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Giulivi, Sara ; Whalen, D. H. ; Goldstein, Louis M. ; Nam, Hosung ; Levitt, Andrea G. / An articulatory phonology account of preferred consonant-vowel combinations. In: Language Learning and Development. 2011 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 202-225.
@article{b73a9bdcedd049f0b9cdcf7be45be6a0,
title = "An articulatory phonology account of preferred consonant-vowel combinations",
abstract = "Certain consonant/vowel combinations (labial/central, coronal/front, velar/back) are more frequent in babbling as well as, to a lesser extent, in adult language than chance would dictate. The {"}Frame then Content{"} (F/C) hypothesis (Davis & MacNeilage, 1994) attributes this pattern to biome-chanical vocal-tract biases that change as infants mature. Articulatory Phonology (AP; Browman & Goldstein, 1989) attributes preferences to demands placed on shared articulators. F/C implies that preferences will diminish as articulatory control increases, while AP does not. Here, babbling from children at 6, 9, and 12 months in English, French, and Mandarin environments was examined. There was no developmental trend in CV preferences, although older ages exhibited greater articulatory control. A perception test showed no evidence of bias toward hearing the preferred combinations. Modeling using articulatory synthesis found limited support for F/C but more for AP, including data not originally encompassed in F/C. AP thus provides an alternative biomechanical explanation.",
author = "Sara Giulivi and Whalen, {D. H.} and Goldstein, {Louis M.} and Hosung Nam and Levitt, {Andrea G.}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15475441.2011.564569",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "202--225",
journal = "Language Learning and Development",
issn = "1547-5441",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An articulatory phonology account of preferred consonant-vowel combinations

AU - Giulivi, Sara

AU - Whalen, D. H.

AU - Goldstein, Louis M.

AU - Nam, Hosung

AU - Levitt, Andrea G.

PY - 2011/7/1

Y1 - 2011/7/1

N2 - Certain consonant/vowel combinations (labial/central, coronal/front, velar/back) are more frequent in babbling as well as, to a lesser extent, in adult language than chance would dictate. The "Frame then Content" (F/C) hypothesis (Davis & MacNeilage, 1994) attributes this pattern to biome-chanical vocal-tract biases that change as infants mature. Articulatory Phonology (AP; Browman & Goldstein, 1989) attributes preferences to demands placed on shared articulators. F/C implies that preferences will diminish as articulatory control increases, while AP does not. Here, babbling from children at 6, 9, and 12 months in English, French, and Mandarin environments was examined. There was no developmental trend in CV preferences, although older ages exhibited greater articulatory control. A perception test showed no evidence of bias toward hearing the preferred combinations. Modeling using articulatory synthesis found limited support for F/C but more for AP, including data not originally encompassed in F/C. AP thus provides an alternative biomechanical explanation.

AB - Certain consonant/vowel combinations (labial/central, coronal/front, velar/back) are more frequent in babbling as well as, to a lesser extent, in adult language than chance would dictate. The "Frame then Content" (F/C) hypothesis (Davis & MacNeilage, 1994) attributes this pattern to biome-chanical vocal-tract biases that change as infants mature. Articulatory Phonology (AP; Browman & Goldstein, 1989) attributes preferences to demands placed on shared articulators. F/C implies that preferences will diminish as articulatory control increases, while AP does not. Here, babbling from children at 6, 9, and 12 months in English, French, and Mandarin environments was examined. There was no developmental trend in CV preferences, although older ages exhibited greater articulatory control. A perception test showed no evidence of bias toward hearing the preferred combinations. Modeling using articulatory synthesis found limited support for F/C but more for AP, including data not originally encompassed in F/C. AP thus provides an alternative biomechanical explanation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960521309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960521309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15475441.2011.564569

DO - 10.1080/15475441.2011.564569

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79960521309

VL - 7

SP - 202

EP - 225

JO - Language Learning and Development

JF - Language Learning and Development

SN - 1547-5441

IS - 3

ER -