An electron microscopic study - Correlation of gastroesophageal reflux disease and laryngopharyngeal reflux

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) originates from regurgitation of gastric contents, a mechanism seemingly identical to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Some researchers postulate a connection between LPR and GERD, whereas some assert LPR is a disease apart from GERD. We examined symptoms of GERD from LPR patients, and performed gastrointestinal endoscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to evaluate GERD findings from these patients. Study Design: Prospective study at an academic tertiary care center. Methods: Control subjects had no symptoms or signs of LPR/GERD. LPR was diagnosed with a Reflux Symptom Index >13 and Reflux Finding Score >7, and were questioned for GERD-related symptoms and examined with esophagogastroduodenoscopy, then allocated into either an LPR without GERD or LPR with GERD group. Esophageal tissues were obtained from the squamocolumnar junction and managed for TEM, and the intercellular space (IS) was measured to find dilatation, a characteristic GERD finding. Results: About 30% (8/26) of LPR patients showed GERD-related symptoms, connecting LPR with the GERD group. Most of the LPR patients showed grossly normal endoscopic findings. On TEM, IS of control group (n = 15) was measured as 0.35 ± 0.27 μm, whereas the LPR without GERD group (n = 18) and LPR with GERD group (n = 8) revealed a dilated IS of 0.61 ± 0.47 lm and 0.95 ± 0.44 μm, respectively. This difference was statistically significant compared to the control group (P < .05). Conclusions: The mean IS of LPR was significantly increased, suggesting common pathogenesis between LPR and GERD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1303-1308
Number of pages6
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume120
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Jul 1

Fingerprint

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Electrons
Extracellular Space
Transmission Electron Microscopy
Digestive System Endoscopy
Control Groups
Gastrointestinal Contents
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Keywords

  • Gastroesophageal reflux disease
  • Laryngopharyngeal reflux
  • Transmission electron microscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

An electron microscopic study - Correlation of gastroesophageal reflux disease and laryngopharyngeal reflux. / Park, Sanghoon; Chun, Hoon-Jai; Keum, Bora; Uhm, Chang Sub; Baek, Seung-Kuk; Jung, Kwang-Yoon; Lee, Sung Joon.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 120, No. 7, 01.07.2010, p. 1303-1308.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5a7989b7036a4dcc880384f43a33809b,
title = "An electron microscopic study - Correlation of gastroesophageal reflux disease and laryngopharyngeal reflux",
abstract = "Objectives/Hypothesis: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) originates from regurgitation of gastric contents, a mechanism seemingly identical to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Some researchers postulate a connection between LPR and GERD, whereas some assert LPR is a disease apart from GERD. We examined symptoms of GERD from LPR patients, and performed gastrointestinal endoscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to evaluate GERD findings from these patients. Study Design: Prospective study at an academic tertiary care center. Methods: Control subjects had no symptoms or signs of LPR/GERD. LPR was diagnosed with a Reflux Symptom Index >13 and Reflux Finding Score >7, and were questioned for GERD-related symptoms and examined with esophagogastroduodenoscopy, then allocated into either an LPR without GERD or LPR with GERD group. Esophageal tissues were obtained from the squamocolumnar junction and managed for TEM, and the intercellular space (IS) was measured to find dilatation, a characteristic GERD finding. Results: About 30{\%} (8/26) of LPR patients showed GERD-related symptoms, connecting LPR with the GERD group. Most of the LPR patients showed grossly normal endoscopic findings. On TEM, IS of control group (n = 15) was measured as 0.35 ± 0.27 μm, whereas the LPR without GERD group (n = 18) and LPR with GERD group (n = 8) revealed a dilated IS of 0.61 ± 0.47 lm and 0.95 ± 0.44 μm, respectively. This difference was statistically significant compared to the control group (P < .05). Conclusions: The mean IS of LPR was significantly increased, suggesting common pathogenesis between LPR and GERD.",
keywords = "Gastroesophageal reflux disease, Laryngopharyngeal reflux, Transmission electron microscopy",
author = "Sanghoon Park and Hoon-Jai Chun and Bora Keum and Uhm, {Chang Sub} and Seung-Kuk Baek and Kwang-Yoon Jung and Lee, {Sung Joon}",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/lary.20918",
language = "English",
volume = "120",
pages = "1303--1308",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An electron microscopic study - Correlation of gastroesophageal reflux disease and laryngopharyngeal reflux

AU - Park, Sanghoon

AU - Chun, Hoon-Jai

AU - Keum, Bora

AU - Uhm, Chang Sub

AU - Baek, Seung-Kuk

AU - Jung, Kwang-Yoon

AU - Lee, Sung Joon

PY - 2010/7/1

Y1 - 2010/7/1

N2 - Objectives/Hypothesis: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) originates from regurgitation of gastric contents, a mechanism seemingly identical to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Some researchers postulate a connection between LPR and GERD, whereas some assert LPR is a disease apart from GERD. We examined symptoms of GERD from LPR patients, and performed gastrointestinal endoscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to evaluate GERD findings from these patients. Study Design: Prospective study at an academic tertiary care center. Methods: Control subjects had no symptoms or signs of LPR/GERD. LPR was diagnosed with a Reflux Symptom Index >13 and Reflux Finding Score >7, and were questioned for GERD-related symptoms and examined with esophagogastroduodenoscopy, then allocated into either an LPR without GERD or LPR with GERD group. Esophageal tissues were obtained from the squamocolumnar junction and managed for TEM, and the intercellular space (IS) was measured to find dilatation, a characteristic GERD finding. Results: About 30% (8/26) of LPR patients showed GERD-related symptoms, connecting LPR with the GERD group. Most of the LPR patients showed grossly normal endoscopic findings. On TEM, IS of control group (n = 15) was measured as 0.35 ± 0.27 μm, whereas the LPR without GERD group (n = 18) and LPR with GERD group (n = 8) revealed a dilated IS of 0.61 ± 0.47 lm and 0.95 ± 0.44 μm, respectively. This difference was statistically significant compared to the control group (P < .05). Conclusions: The mean IS of LPR was significantly increased, suggesting common pathogenesis between LPR and GERD.

AB - Objectives/Hypothesis: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) originates from regurgitation of gastric contents, a mechanism seemingly identical to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Some researchers postulate a connection between LPR and GERD, whereas some assert LPR is a disease apart from GERD. We examined symptoms of GERD from LPR patients, and performed gastrointestinal endoscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to evaluate GERD findings from these patients. Study Design: Prospective study at an academic tertiary care center. Methods: Control subjects had no symptoms or signs of LPR/GERD. LPR was diagnosed with a Reflux Symptom Index >13 and Reflux Finding Score >7, and were questioned for GERD-related symptoms and examined with esophagogastroduodenoscopy, then allocated into either an LPR without GERD or LPR with GERD group. Esophageal tissues were obtained from the squamocolumnar junction and managed for TEM, and the intercellular space (IS) was measured to find dilatation, a characteristic GERD finding. Results: About 30% (8/26) of LPR patients showed GERD-related symptoms, connecting LPR with the GERD group. Most of the LPR patients showed grossly normal endoscopic findings. On TEM, IS of control group (n = 15) was measured as 0.35 ± 0.27 μm, whereas the LPR without GERD group (n = 18) and LPR with GERD group (n = 8) revealed a dilated IS of 0.61 ± 0.47 lm and 0.95 ± 0.44 μm, respectively. This difference was statistically significant compared to the control group (P < .05). Conclusions: The mean IS of LPR was significantly increased, suggesting common pathogenesis between LPR and GERD.

KW - Gastroesophageal reflux disease

KW - Laryngopharyngeal reflux

KW - Transmission electron microscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954411858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954411858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.20918

DO - 10.1002/lary.20918

M3 - Article

C2 - 20564655

AN - SCOPUS:77954411858

VL - 120

SP - 1303

EP - 1308

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 7

ER -