An empirical interference modeling for link reliability assessment in wireless networks

Shinuk Woo, Hwangnam Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In recent years, it has been widely believed in the community that the link reliability is strongly related to received signal strength indicator (RSSI) [or signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR)] and external interference makes it unpredictable, which is different from the previous understanding that there is no tight relationship between the link reliability and RSSI (or SINR), but multipath fading causes the unpredictability. However, both cannot fully explain why the unpredictability appears in the link state. In this paper, we unravel the following questions: 1) What causes frame losses that are directly related to intermediate link states? 2) Is RSSI or SINR a right criterion to represent the link reliability? 3) Is there a better measure to assess the link reliability? We first configured a testbed for performing a real measurement study to identify the causes of frame losses, and observed that link reliability depends on an intraframe SINR distribution, not a single value of RSSI (or SINR). We also learned that an RSSI value is not always a good indicator to estimate the link state. We then conducted a further investigation on the intraframe SINR distribution and the relationship between the SINR and link reliability with the ns-2 simulator. Based on these results, we finally propose an interference modeling framework for estimating link states in the presence of wireless interferences. We envision that the framework can be used for developing link-aware protocols to achieve their optimal performance in a hostile wireless environment.

Original languageEnglish
Article number6200006
Pages (from-to)272-285
Number of pages14
JournalIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Wireless networks
Multipath fading
Testbeds
Telecommunication links
Simulators
Network protocols

Keywords

  • Estimation
  • frame loss
  • intraframe signal-to- interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) distribution
  • link state
  • received signal strength indicator (RSSI)
  • SINR
  • wireless interference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Software
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Cite this

An empirical interference modeling for link reliability assessment in wireless networks. / Woo, Shinuk; Kim, Hwangnam.

In: IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol. 21, No. 1, 6200006, 01.01.2013, p. 272-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{eeaeba407cd44d9db202264acd18b50e,
title = "An empirical interference modeling for link reliability assessment in wireless networks",
abstract = "In recent years, it has been widely believed in the community that the link reliability is strongly related to received signal strength indicator (RSSI) [or signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR)] and external interference makes it unpredictable, which is different from the previous understanding that there is no tight relationship between the link reliability and RSSI (or SINR), but multipath fading causes the unpredictability. However, both cannot fully explain why the unpredictability appears in the link state. In this paper, we unravel the following questions: 1) What causes frame losses that are directly related to intermediate link states? 2) Is RSSI or SINR a right criterion to represent the link reliability? 3) Is there a better measure to assess the link reliability? We first configured a testbed for performing a real measurement study to identify the causes of frame losses, and observed that link reliability depends on an intraframe SINR distribution, not a single value of RSSI (or SINR). We also learned that an RSSI value is not always a good indicator to estimate the link state. We then conducted a further investigation on the intraframe SINR distribution and the relationship between the SINR and link reliability with the ns-2 simulator. Based on these results, we finally propose an interference modeling framework for estimating link states in the presence of wireless interferences. We envision that the framework can be used for developing link-aware protocols to achieve their optimal performance in a hostile wireless environment.",
keywords = "Estimation, frame loss, intraframe signal-to- interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) distribution, link state, received signal strength indicator (RSSI), SINR, wireless interference",
author = "Shinuk Woo and Hwangnam Kim",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/TNET.2012.2197864",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "272--285",
journal = "IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking",
issn = "1063-6692",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An empirical interference modeling for link reliability assessment in wireless networks

AU - Woo, Shinuk

AU - Kim, Hwangnam

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - In recent years, it has been widely believed in the community that the link reliability is strongly related to received signal strength indicator (RSSI) [or signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR)] and external interference makes it unpredictable, which is different from the previous understanding that there is no tight relationship between the link reliability and RSSI (or SINR), but multipath fading causes the unpredictability. However, both cannot fully explain why the unpredictability appears in the link state. In this paper, we unravel the following questions: 1) What causes frame losses that are directly related to intermediate link states? 2) Is RSSI or SINR a right criterion to represent the link reliability? 3) Is there a better measure to assess the link reliability? We first configured a testbed for performing a real measurement study to identify the causes of frame losses, and observed that link reliability depends on an intraframe SINR distribution, not a single value of RSSI (or SINR). We also learned that an RSSI value is not always a good indicator to estimate the link state. We then conducted a further investigation on the intraframe SINR distribution and the relationship between the SINR and link reliability with the ns-2 simulator. Based on these results, we finally propose an interference modeling framework for estimating link states in the presence of wireless interferences. We envision that the framework can be used for developing link-aware protocols to achieve their optimal performance in a hostile wireless environment.

AB - In recent years, it has been widely believed in the community that the link reliability is strongly related to received signal strength indicator (RSSI) [or signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR)] and external interference makes it unpredictable, which is different from the previous understanding that there is no tight relationship between the link reliability and RSSI (or SINR), but multipath fading causes the unpredictability. However, both cannot fully explain why the unpredictability appears in the link state. In this paper, we unravel the following questions: 1) What causes frame losses that are directly related to intermediate link states? 2) Is RSSI or SINR a right criterion to represent the link reliability? 3) Is there a better measure to assess the link reliability? We first configured a testbed for performing a real measurement study to identify the causes of frame losses, and observed that link reliability depends on an intraframe SINR distribution, not a single value of RSSI (or SINR). We also learned that an RSSI value is not always a good indicator to estimate the link state. We then conducted a further investigation on the intraframe SINR distribution and the relationship between the SINR and link reliability with the ns-2 simulator. Based on these results, we finally propose an interference modeling framework for estimating link states in the presence of wireless interferences. We envision that the framework can be used for developing link-aware protocols to achieve their optimal performance in a hostile wireless environment.

KW - Estimation

KW - frame loss

KW - intraframe signal-to- interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) distribution

KW - link state

KW - received signal strength indicator (RSSI)

KW - SINR

KW - wireless interference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873997726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873997726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TNET.2012.2197864

DO - 10.1109/TNET.2012.2197864

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84873997726

VL - 21

SP - 272

EP - 285

JO - IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking

JF - IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking

SN - 1063-6692

IS - 1

M1 - 6200006

ER -