An experimental comparison of haptic and automated pilot support systems

Mario Olivari, Frank M. Nieuwenhuizen, Heinrich Bulthoff, Lorenzo Pollini

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

External aids are required to increase safety and performance during the manual control of an aircraft. Automated systems allow to surpass the performance usually achieved by pilots. However, they suffer from several issues caused by pilot unawareness of the control command from the automation. Haptic aids can overcome these issues by showing their control command through forces on the control device. To investigate how the transparency of the haptic control action in flences performance and pilot behavior, a quantitative comparison between haptic aids and automation is needed. An experiment was conducted in which pilots performed a compensatory tracking task with haptic aids and with automation. The haptic aid and the automation were designed to be equivalent when the pilot was out-of-the-loop, i.e., to provide the same control command. Pilot performance and control effort were then evaluated with pilots in-the-loop and contrasted to a baseline condition without external aids. The haptic system allowed pilots to improve performance compared with the baseline condition. However, automation outperformed the other two conditions. Pilots control effort was reduced by the haptic aid and the automation in a similar way. In addition, the pilot open-loop response was estimated with a non-parametric estimation method. Changes in the pilot response were observed in terms of increased crossover frequency with automation, and decreased neuromuscular peak with haptics.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference 2014
PublisherAmerican Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc.
ISBN (Print)9781624102974
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Jan 1
EventAIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference 2014 - Atlanta, United States
Duration: 2014 Jun 162014 Jun 20

Other

OtherAIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference 2014
CountryUnited States
CityAtlanta
Period14/6/1614/6/20

Fingerprint

Haptics
Automation
Baseline
Manual control
Transparency
Nonparametric Estimation
Crossover
Aircraft
Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Modelling and Simulation
  • Aerospace Engineering

Cite this

Olivari, M., Nieuwenhuizen, F. M., Bulthoff, H., & Pollini, L. (2014). An experimental comparison of haptic and automated pilot support systems. In AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference 2014 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc.. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-0809

An experimental comparison of haptic and automated pilot support systems. / Olivari, Mario; Nieuwenhuizen, Frank M.; Bulthoff, Heinrich; Pollini, Lorenzo.

AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference 2014. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc., 2014.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Olivari, M, Nieuwenhuizen, FM, Bulthoff, H & Pollini, L 2014, An experimental comparison of haptic and automated pilot support systems. in AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference 2014. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc., AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference 2014, Atlanta, United States, 14/6/16. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-0809
Olivari M, Nieuwenhuizen FM, Bulthoff H, Pollini L. An experimental comparison of haptic and automated pilot support systems. In AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference 2014. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. 2014 https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-0809
Olivari, Mario ; Nieuwenhuizen, Frank M. ; Bulthoff, Heinrich ; Pollini, Lorenzo. / An experimental comparison of haptic and automated pilot support systems. AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference 2014. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc., 2014.
@inproceedings{4742e0f0eb5d4bd389d241797d1ffda5,
title = "An experimental comparison of haptic and automated pilot support systems",
abstract = "External aids are required to increase safety and performance during the manual control of an aircraft. Automated systems allow to surpass the performance usually achieved by pilots. However, they suffer from several issues caused by pilot unawareness of the control command from the automation. Haptic aids can overcome these issues by showing their control command through forces on the control device. To investigate how the transparency of the haptic control action in flences performance and pilot behavior, a quantitative comparison between haptic aids and automation is needed. An experiment was conducted in which pilots performed a compensatory tracking task with haptic aids and with automation. The haptic aid and the automation were designed to be equivalent when the pilot was out-of-the-loop, i.e., to provide the same control command. Pilot performance and control effort were then evaluated with pilots in-the-loop and contrasted to a baseline condition without external aids. The haptic system allowed pilots to improve performance compared with the baseline condition. However, automation outperformed the other two conditions. Pilots control effort was reduced by the haptic aid and the automation in a similar way. In addition, the pilot open-loop response was estimated with a non-parametric estimation method. Changes in the pilot response were observed in terms of increased crossover frequency with automation, and decreased neuromuscular peak with haptics.",
author = "Mario Olivari and Nieuwenhuizen, {Frank M.} and Heinrich Bulthoff and Lorenzo Pollini",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2514/6.2014-0809",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781624102974",
booktitle = "AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference 2014",
publisher = "American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc.",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - An experimental comparison of haptic and automated pilot support systems

AU - Olivari, Mario

AU - Nieuwenhuizen, Frank M.

AU - Bulthoff, Heinrich

AU - Pollini, Lorenzo

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - External aids are required to increase safety and performance during the manual control of an aircraft. Automated systems allow to surpass the performance usually achieved by pilots. However, they suffer from several issues caused by pilot unawareness of the control command from the automation. Haptic aids can overcome these issues by showing their control command through forces on the control device. To investigate how the transparency of the haptic control action in flences performance and pilot behavior, a quantitative comparison between haptic aids and automation is needed. An experiment was conducted in which pilots performed a compensatory tracking task with haptic aids and with automation. The haptic aid and the automation were designed to be equivalent when the pilot was out-of-the-loop, i.e., to provide the same control command. Pilot performance and control effort were then evaluated with pilots in-the-loop and contrasted to a baseline condition without external aids. The haptic system allowed pilots to improve performance compared with the baseline condition. However, automation outperformed the other two conditions. Pilots control effort was reduced by the haptic aid and the automation in a similar way. In addition, the pilot open-loop response was estimated with a non-parametric estimation method. Changes in the pilot response were observed in terms of increased crossover frequency with automation, and decreased neuromuscular peak with haptics.

AB - External aids are required to increase safety and performance during the manual control of an aircraft. Automated systems allow to surpass the performance usually achieved by pilots. However, they suffer from several issues caused by pilot unawareness of the control command from the automation. Haptic aids can overcome these issues by showing their control command through forces on the control device. To investigate how the transparency of the haptic control action in flences performance and pilot behavior, a quantitative comparison between haptic aids and automation is needed. An experiment was conducted in which pilots performed a compensatory tracking task with haptic aids and with automation. The haptic aid and the automation were designed to be equivalent when the pilot was out-of-the-loop, i.e., to provide the same control command. Pilot performance and control effort were then evaluated with pilots in-the-loop and contrasted to a baseline condition without external aids. The haptic system allowed pilots to improve performance compared with the baseline condition. However, automation outperformed the other two conditions. Pilots control effort was reduced by the haptic aid and the automation in a similar way. In addition, the pilot open-loop response was estimated with a non-parametric estimation method. Changes in the pilot response were observed in terms of increased crossover frequency with automation, and decreased neuromuscular peak with haptics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84912061748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84912061748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2514/6.2014-0809

DO - 10.2514/6.2014-0809

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84912061748

SN - 9781624102974

BT - AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference 2014

PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc.

ER -