Analysis of viscoelastic properties of wrist joint for quantification of parkinsonian rigidity

Byung Kyu Park, Yuri Kwon, Ji Won Kim, Jae Ho Lee, Gwang Moon Eom, Seong Beom Koh, Jae Hoon Jun, Junghwa Hong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study aims to analyze viscoelastic properties of the wrist in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) in comparison with the clinical score of severity. Forty-five patients with PD and 12 healthy volunteers participated in this study. Severity of rigidity at the wrist was rated by a neurologist just before the experiment. Wrist joint torque resistive to the imposed movement was measured. Three different models, (identical in structure, only different in the number of parameters for extension and flexion phases) were used in identification of viscoelastic properties: 1) one damping constant and one spring constant throughout all phases, 2) two damping constants for each phase and one spring constant throughout all phases, and 3) two damping constants and two spring constants for each phase. Normalized work and impulse suggested in the literature were also calculated. Spring constants of different models and phases showed comparable correlation with rigidity score (r=0.68-0.73). In terms of the correlation of damping constant with clinical rigidity score, model 1 (r = 0.90) was better than models 2 and 3 (r=0.59 - 0.71). These results suggest that the clinical rigidity score is better represented by the mean viscosity during both flexion and extension. In models with two dampers (model 2 and 3), the damping constant was greater during extension than flexion in patients (p < 0.001), in contrast that there was no phase difference in normal subjects. This suggests that in contrast with normal subjects, phase-dependent viscosity may be an inherent feature of PD. Although work and impulse were correlated with clinical rigidity score (r = 0.11 - 0.84), they could not represent the phase-dependent rigidity inherent in PD. In conclusion, the viscosity of model 1 would be appropriate for quantification of clinical ratings of rigidity and that of model 2 for distinction of PD and also for investigation of phase-dependent characteristics in parkinsonian rigidity.

Original languageEnglish
Article number5625915
Pages (from-to)167-176
Number of pages10
JournalIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Apr 1

Fingerprint

Wrist Joint
Rigidity
Parkinson Disease
Viscosity
Wrist
Damping
Torque
Healthy Volunteers

Keywords

  • Parkinson's disease
  • phase-dependency
  • quantification
  • rigidity
  • viscoelasticity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Analysis of viscoelastic properties of wrist joint for quantification of parkinsonian rigidity. / Park, Byung Kyu; Kwon, Yuri; Kim, Ji Won; Lee, Jae Ho; Eom, Gwang Moon; Koh, Seong Beom; Jun, Jae Hoon; Hong, Junghwa.

In: IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 2, 5625915, 01.04.2011, p. 167-176.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Park, Byung Kyu ; Kwon, Yuri ; Kim, Ji Won ; Lee, Jae Ho ; Eom, Gwang Moon ; Koh, Seong Beom ; Jun, Jae Hoon ; Hong, Junghwa. / Analysis of viscoelastic properties of wrist joint for quantification of parkinsonian rigidity. In: IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2011 ; Vol. 19, No. 2. pp. 167-176.
@article{2f46eb101e0f4d5ab05af88872684024,
title = "Analysis of viscoelastic properties of wrist joint for quantification of parkinsonian rigidity",
abstract = "This study aims to analyze viscoelastic properties of the wrist in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) in comparison with the clinical score of severity. Forty-five patients with PD and 12 healthy volunteers participated in this study. Severity of rigidity at the wrist was rated by a neurologist just before the experiment. Wrist joint torque resistive to the imposed movement was measured. Three different models, (identical in structure, only different in the number of parameters for extension and flexion phases) were used in identification of viscoelastic properties: 1) one damping constant and one spring constant throughout all phases, 2) two damping constants for each phase and one spring constant throughout all phases, and 3) two damping constants and two spring constants for each phase. Normalized work and impulse suggested in the literature were also calculated. Spring constants of different models and phases showed comparable correlation with rigidity score (r=0.68-0.73). In terms of the correlation of damping constant with clinical rigidity score, model 1 (r = 0.90) was better than models 2 and 3 (r=0.59 - 0.71). These results suggest that the clinical rigidity score is better represented by the mean viscosity during both flexion and extension. In models with two dampers (model 2 and 3), the damping constant was greater during extension than flexion in patients (p < 0.001), in contrast that there was no phase difference in normal subjects. This suggests that in contrast with normal subjects, phase-dependent viscosity may be an inherent feature of PD. Although work and impulse were correlated with clinical rigidity score (r = 0.11 - 0.84), they could not represent the phase-dependent rigidity inherent in PD. In conclusion, the viscosity of model 1 would be appropriate for quantification of clinical ratings of rigidity and that of model 2 for distinction of PD and also for investigation of phase-dependent characteristics in parkinsonian rigidity.",
keywords = "Parkinson's disease, phase-dependency, quantification, rigidity, viscoelasticity",
author = "Park, {Byung Kyu} and Yuri Kwon and Kim, {Ji Won} and Lee, {Jae Ho} and Eom, {Gwang Moon} and Koh, {Seong Beom} and Jun, {Jae Hoon} and Junghwa Hong",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2091149",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "167--176",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering",
issn = "1534-4320",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of viscoelastic properties of wrist joint for quantification of parkinsonian rigidity

AU - Park, Byung Kyu

AU - Kwon, Yuri

AU - Kim, Ji Won

AU - Lee, Jae Ho

AU - Eom, Gwang Moon

AU - Koh, Seong Beom

AU - Jun, Jae Hoon

AU - Hong, Junghwa

PY - 2011/4/1

Y1 - 2011/4/1

N2 - This study aims to analyze viscoelastic properties of the wrist in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) in comparison with the clinical score of severity. Forty-five patients with PD and 12 healthy volunteers participated in this study. Severity of rigidity at the wrist was rated by a neurologist just before the experiment. Wrist joint torque resistive to the imposed movement was measured. Three different models, (identical in structure, only different in the number of parameters for extension and flexion phases) were used in identification of viscoelastic properties: 1) one damping constant and one spring constant throughout all phases, 2) two damping constants for each phase and one spring constant throughout all phases, and 3) two damping constants and two spring constants for each phase. Normalized work and impulse suggested in the literature were also calculated. Spring constants of different models and phases showed comparable correlation with rigidity score (r=0.68-0.73). In terms of the correlation of damping constant with clinical rigidity score, model 1 (r = 0.90) was better than models 2 and 3 (r=0.59 - 0.71). These results suggest that the clinical rigidity score is better represented by the mean viscosity during both flexion and extension. In models with two dampers (model 2 and 3), the damping constant was greater during extension than flexion in patients (p < 0.001), in contrast that there was no phase difference in normal subjects. This suggests that in contrast with normal subjects, phase-dependent viscosity may be an inherent feature of PD. Although work and impulse were correlated with clinical rigidity score (r = 0.11 - 0.84), they could not represent the phase-dependent rigidity inherent in PD. In conclusion, the viscosity of model 1 would be appropriate for quantification of clinical ratings of rigidity and that of model 2 for distinction of PD and also for investigation of phase-dependent characteristics in parkinsonian rigidity.

AB - This study aims to analyze viscoelastic properties of the wrist in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) in comparison with the clinical score of severity. Forty-five patients with PD and 12 healthy volunteers participated in this study. Severity of rigidity at the wrist was rated by a neurologist just before the experiment. Wrist joint torque resistive to the imposed movement was measured. Three different models, (identical in structure, only different in the number of parameters for extension and flexion phases) were used in identification of viscoelastic properties: 1) one damping constant and one spring constant throughout all phases, 2) two damping constants for each phase and one spring constant throughout all phases, and 3) two damping constants and two spring constants for each phase. Normalized work and impulse suggested in the literature were also calculated. Spring constants of different models and phases showed comparable correlation with rigidity score (r=0.68-0.73). In terms of the correlation of damping constant with clinical rigidity score, model 1 (r = 0.90) was better than models 2 and 3 (r=0.59 - 0.71). These results suggest that the clinical rigidity score is better represented by the mean viscosity during both flexion and extension. In models with two dampers (model 2 and 3), the damping constant was greater during extension than flexion in patients (p < 0.001), in contrast that there was no phase difference in normal subjects. This suggests that in contrast with normal subjects, phase-dependent viscosity may be an inherent feature of PD. Although work and impulse were correlated with clinical rigidity score (r = 0.11 - 0.84), they could not represent the phase-dependent rigidity inherent in PD. In conclusion, the viscosity of model 1 would be appropriate for quantification of clinical ratings of rigidity and that of model 2 for distinction of PD and also for investigation of phase-dependent characteristics in parkinsonian rigidity.

KW - Parkinson's disease

KW - phase-dependency

KW - quantification

KW - rigidity

KW - viscoelasticity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954476661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79954476661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2091149

DO - 10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2091149

M3 - Article

C2 - 21075739

AN - SCOPUS:79954476661

VL - 19

SP - 167

EP - 176

JO - IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

JF - IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

SN - 1534-4320

IS - 2

M1 - 5625915

ER -