TY - JOUR
T1 - Antimicrobial prophylaxis using a 2nd generation cephalosporin after laparoscopic colorectal resection
T2 - A randomized trial of 1-day vs. 3-day
AU - Kwak, Han Deok
AU - Choi, Dong Jin
AU - Woo, Si Uk
AU - Kim, Jin
AU - Um, Jun Won
AU - Kim, Seon Hahn
PY - 2010/6
Y1 - 2010/6
N2 - Purpose: We performed this study to compare 1-day group using a 2nd generation cephalsporin with 3-day group for evaluating hospital acquired infection. Methods: The patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery at Korea University Medical Center Anam Hospital, from August, 2007 to June, 2008. They were randomly allocated to 2 groups: 1-day or 3-day group. A 2nd generation cephalosporin was administered within 1 hour before surgery with 12-hour intervals. In cases of suspected infection, further studies were done to identify infection. Results: The study included 154 patients (1-day group - 78, vs. 3-day group - 76). No differences were noted between the 2 groups in age, body mass index, smoking, diabetes mellitus, corticosteroid-use were noted. Gender (P=0.011) and mean operative time (P=0.047) between the 2 groups were different. The preventive rates of infection were 87.18% in the 1-day group compared with 82.89% in the 3-day group (P=0.456). Conclusion: Our prospective randomized control study concluded that there were no differences between the 1-day and 3-day group in hospital acquired infection. We could come to the conclusion that 1-day antimicrobial agent in laparoscopic colorectal surgery would be adequate in preventing infection.
AB - Purpose: We performed this study to compare 1-day group using a 2nd generation cephalsporin with 3-day group for evaluating hospital acquired infection. Methods: The patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery at Korea University Medical Center Anam Hospital, from August, 2007 to June, 2008. They were randomly allocated to 2 groups: 1-day or 3-day group. A 2nd generation cephalosporin was administered within 1 hour before surgery with 12-hour intervals. In cases of suspected infection, further studies were done to identify infection. Results: The study included 154 patients (1-day group - 78, vs. 3-day group - 76). No differences were noted between the 2 groups in age, body mass index, smoking, diabetes mellitus, corticosteroid-use were noted. Gender (P=0.011) and mean operative time (P=0.047) between the 2 groups were different. The preventive rates of infection were 87.18% in the 1-day group compared with 82.89% in the 3-day group (P=0.456). Conclusion: Our prospective randomized control study concluded that there were no differences between the 1-day and 3-day group in hospital acquired infection. We could come to the conclusion that 1-day antimicrobial agent in laparoscopic colorectal surgery would be adequate in preventing infection.
KW - Antimicrobial prophylaxis
KW - Hospital acquired infection
KW - Laparoscopic colorectal surgery
KW - Monotherapy
KW - Surgical site infection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960156065&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4174/jkss.2010.78.6.385
DO - 10.4174/jkss.2010.78.6.385
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:79960156065
SN - 2288-6575
VL - 78
SP - 385
EP - 389
JO - Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
JF - Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
IS - 6
ER -