Applying Win Win to quality requirements

A case study

Hoh In, B. Boehm, T. Rodgers, M. Deutsch

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper describes the application of the WinWin paradigm to identify and resolve conflicts in a series of real-client, student-developer digital library projects. The paper is based on a case study of the statistical analysis of 15 projects and an in-depth analysis of one representative project. These analyses focus on the conflict resolution process, stakeholders' roles and their relationships to quality artifacts, and tool effectiveness. We show that stakeholders tend to accept satisfactory rather than optimal resolutions. Users and customers are more proactive in stating win conditions, whereas developers are more active in working toward resolutions. Further, we suggest that knowledge-based automated aids have potential to significantly enhance process effectiveness and efficiency. Finally, we conclude that such processes and tools have theoretical and practical implications in the quest for better software requirements elicitation.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering
Pages555-564
Number of pages10
Publication statusPublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes
Event23rd International Conference ojn Software Engineering - Toronto, Ont, Canada
Duration: 2001 May 122001 May 19

Other

Other23rd International Conference ojn Software Engineering
CountryCanada
CityToronto, Ont
Period01/5/1201/5/19

Fingerprint

Digital libraries
Statistical methods
Students

Keywords

  • Conflict identification and resolution
  • Requirements engineering
  • Risk
  • Software cost analysis
  • Software quality attributes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software

Cite this

In, H., Boehm, B., Rodgers, T., & Deutsch, M. (2001). Applying Win Win to quality requirements: A case study. In Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 555-564)

Applying Win Win to quality requirements : A case study. / In, Hoh; Boehm, B.; Rodgers, T.; Deutsch, M.

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering. 2001. p. 555-564.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

In, H, Boehm, B, Rodgers, T & Deutsch, M 2001, Applying Win Win to quality requirements: A case study. in Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering. pp. 555-564, 23rd International Conference ojn Software Engineering, Toronto, Ont, Canada, 01/5/12.
In H, Boehm B, Rodgers T, Deutsch M. Applying Win Win to quality requirements: A case study. In Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering. 2001. p. 555-564
In, Hoh ; Boehm, B. ; Rodgers, T. ; Deutsch, M. / Applying Win Win to quality requirements : A case study. Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering. 2001. pp. 555-564
@inproceedings{ae3a8c6053b34f2798b0787f223aa4a3,
title = "Applying Win Win to quality requirements: A case study",
abstract = "This paper describes the application of the WinWin paradigm to identify and resolve conflicts in a series of real-client, student-developer digital library projects. The paper is based on a case study of the statistical analysis of 15 projects and an in-depth analysis of one representative project. These analyses focus on the conflict resolution process, stakeholders' roles and their relationships to quality artifacts, and tool effectiveness. We show that stakeholders tend to accept satisfactory rather than optimal resolutions. Users and customers are more proactive in stating win conditions, whereas developers are more active in working toward resolutions. Further, we suggest that knowledge-based automated aids have potential to significantly enhance process effectiveness and efficiency. Finally, we conclude that such processes and tools have theoretical and practical implications in the quest for better software requirements elicitation.",
keywords = "Conflict identification and resolution, Requirements engineering, Risk, Software cost analysis, Software quality attributes",
author = "Hoh In and B. Boehm and T. Rodgers and M. Deutsch",
year = "2001",
language = "English",
pages = "555--564",
booktitle = "Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Applying Win Win to quality requirements

T2 - A case study

AU - In, Hoh

AU - Boehm, B.

AU - Rodgers, T.

AU - Deutsch, M.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - This paper describes the application of the WinWin paradigm to identify and resolve conflicts in a series of real-client, student-developer digital library projects. The paper is based on a case study of the statistical analysis of 15 projects and an in-depth analysis of one representative project. These analyses focus on the conflict resolution process, stakeholders' roles and their relationships to quality artifacts, and tool effectiveness. We show that stakeholders tend to accept satisfactory rather than optimal resolutions. Users and customers are more proactive in stating win conditions, whereas developers are more active in working toward resolutions. Further, we suggest that knowledge-based automated aids have potential to significantly enhance process effectiveness and efficiency. Finally, we conclude that such processes and tools have theoretical and practical implications in the quest for better software requirements elicitation.

AB - This paper describes the application of the WinWin paradigm to identify and resolve conflicts in a series of real-client, student-developer digital library projects. The paper is based on a case study of the statistical analysis of 15 projects and an in-depth analysis of one representative project. These analyses focus on the conflict resolution process, stakeholders' roles and their relationships to quality artifacts, and tool effectiveness. We show that stakeholders tend to accept satisfactory rather than optimal resolutions. Users and customers are more proactive in stating win conditions, whereas developers are more active in working toward resolutions. Further, we suggest that knowledge-based automated aids have potential to significantly enhance process effectiveness and efficiency. Finally, we conclude that such processes and tools have theoretical and practical implications in the quest for better software requirements elicitation.

KW - Conflict identification and resolution

KW - Requirements engineering

KW - Risk

KW - Software cost analysis

KW - Software quality attributes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035011750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035011750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 555

EP - 564

BT - Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

ER -