Are all GMOs the same? Consumer acceptance of cisgenic rice in India

Aaron M. Shew, Lawton L. Nalley, Diana M. Danforth, Bruce L. Dixon, Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr, Anne Cecile Delwaide, Barbara Valent

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

India has more than 215 million food-insecure people, many of whom are farmers. Genetically modified (GM) crops have the potential to alleviate this problem by increasing food supplies and strengthening farmer livelihoods. For this to occur, two factors are critical: (i) a change in the regulatory status of GM crops, and (ii) consumer acceptance of GM foods. There are generally two classifications of GM crops based on how they are bred: cisgenically bred, containing only DNA sequences from sexually compatible organisms; and transgenically bred, including DNA sequences from sexually incompatible organisms. Consumers may view cisgenic foods as more natural than those produced via transgenesis, thus influencing consumer acceptance. This premise was the catalyst for our study-would Indian consumers accept cisgenically bred rice and if so, how would they value cisgenics compared to conventionally bred rice, GM-labelled rice and 'no fungicide' rice? In this willingness-to-pay study, respondents did not view cisgenic and GM rice differently. However, participants were willing-to-pay a premium for any aforementioned rice with a 'no fungicide' attribute, which cisgenics and GM could provide. Although not significantly different (P = 0.16), 76% and 73% of respondents stated a willingness-to-consume GM and cisgenic foods, respectively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4-7
Number of pages4
JournalPlant Biotechnology Journal
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jan 1

Fingerprint

consumer acceptance
India
rice
breeds
Genetically Modified Food
fungicides
crops
farmers
nucleotide sequences
Food
genetically modified foods
Gene Transfer Techniques
Food Supply
willingness to pay
organisms
livelihood
catalysts
Oryza
taxonomy

Keywords

  • Cisgenesis
  • Consumer acceptance
  • Food security
  • Genetically modified organisms
  • India
  • Rice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Plant Science
  • Biotechnology
  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

Shew, A. M., Nalley, L. L., Danforth, D. M., Dixon, B. L., Nayga, Jr, R. M., Delwaide, A. C., & Valent, B. (2016). Are all GMOs the same? Consumer acceptance of cisgenic rice in India. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 14(1), 4-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12442

Are all GMOs the same? Consumer acceptance of cisgenic rice in India. / Shew, Aaron M.; Nalley, Lawton L.; Danforth, Diana M.; Dixon, Bruce L.; Nayga, Jr, Rodolfo M.; Delwaide, Anne Cecile; Valent, Barbara.

In: Plant Biotechnology Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 4-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shew, AM, Nalley, LL, Danforth, DM, Dixon, BL, Nayga, Jr, RM, Delwaide, AC & Valent, B 2016, 'Are all GMOs the same? Consumer acceptance of cisgenic rice in India', Plant Biotechnology Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 4-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12442
Shew AM, Nalley LL, Danforth DM, Dixon BL, Nayga, Jr RM, Delwaide AC et al. Are all GMOs the same? Consumer acceptance of cisgenic rice in India. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2016 Jan 1;14(1):4-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12442
Shew, Aaron M. ; Nalley, Lawton L. ; Danforth, Diana M. ; Dixon, Bruce L. ; Nayga, Jr, Rodolfo M. ; Delwaide, Anne Cecile ; Valent, Barbara. / Are all GMOs the same? Consumer acceptance of cisgenic rice in India. In: Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2016 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 4-7.
@article{2cd5ea74512545b3b0025de7f6b3f167,
title = "Are all GMOs the same? Consumer acceptance of cisgenic rice in India",
abstract = "India has more than 215 million food-insecure people, many of whom are farmers. Genetically modified (GM) crops have the potential to alleviate this problem by increasing food supplies and strengthening farmer livelihoods. For this to occur, two factors are critical: (i) a change in the regulatory status of GM crops, and (ii) consumer acceptance of GM foods. There are generally two classifications of GM crops based on how they are bred: cisgenically bred, containing only DNA sequences from sexually compatible organisms; and transgenically bred, including DNA sequences from sexually incompatible organisms. Consumers may view cisgenic foods as more natural than those produced via transgenesis, thus influencing consumer acceptance. This premise was the catalyst for our study-would Indian consumers accept cisgenically bred rice and if so, how would they value cisgenics compared to conventionally bred rice, GM-labelled rice and 'no fungicide' rice? In this willingness-to-pay study, respondents did not view cisgenic and GM rice differently. However, participants were willing-to-pay a premium for any aforementioned rice with a 'no fungicide' attribute, which cisgenics and GM could provide. Although not significantly different (P = 0.16), 76{\%} and 73{\%} of respondents stated a willingness-to-consume GM and cisgenic foods, respectively.",
keywords = "Cisgenesis, Consumer acceptance, Food security, Genetically modified organisms, India, Rice",
author = "Shew, {Aaron M.} and Nalley, {Lawton L.} and Danforth, {Diana M.} and Dixon, {Bruce L.} and {Nayga, Jr}, {Rodolfo M.} and Delwaide, {Anne Cecile} and Barbara Valent",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/pbi.12442",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "4--7",
journal = "Plant Biotechnology Journal",
issn = "1467-7644",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are all GMOs the same? Consumer acceptance of cisgenic rice in India

AU - Shew, Aaron M.

AU - Nalley, Lawton L.

AU - Danforth, Diana M.

AU - Dixon, Bruce L.

AU - Nayga, Jr, Rodolfo M.

AU - Delwaide, Anne Cecile

AU - Valent, Barbara

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - India has more than 215 million food-insecure people, many of whom are farmers. Genetically modified (GM) crops have the potential to alleviate this problem by increasing food supplies and strengthening farmer livelihoods. For this to occur, two factors are critical: (i) a change in the regulatory status of GM crops, and (ii) consumer acceptance of GM foods. There are generally two classifications of GM crops based on how they are bred: cisgenically bred, containing only DNA sequences from sexually compatible organisms; and transgenically bred, including DNA sequences from sexually incompatible organisms. Consumers may view cisgenic foods as more natural than those produced via transgenesis, thus influencing consumer acceptance. This premise was the catalyst for our study-would Indian consumers accept cisgenically bred rice and if so, how would they value cisgenics compared to conventionally bred rice, GM-labelled rice and 'no fungicide' rice? In this willingness-to-pay study, respondents did not view cisgenic and GM rice differently. However, participants were willing-to-pay a premium for any aforementioned rice with a 'no fungicide' attribute, which cisgenics and GM could provide. Although not significantly different (P = 0.16), 76% and 73% of respondents stated a willingness-to-consume GM and cisgenic foods, respectively.

AB - India has more than 215 million food-insecure people, many of whom are farmers. Genetically modified (GM) crops have the potential to alleviate this problem by increasing food supplies and strengthening farmer livelihoods. For this to occur, two factors are critical: (i) a change in the regulatory status of GM crops, and (ii) consumer acceptance of GM foods. There are generally two classifications of GM crops based on how they are bred: cisgenically bred, containing only DNA sequences from sexually compatible organisms; and transgenically bred, including DNA sequences from sexually incompatible organisms. Consumers may view cisgenic foods as more natural than those produced via transgenesis, thus influencing consumer acceptance. This premise was the catalyst for our study-would Indian consumers accept cisgenically bred rice and if so, how would they value cisgenics compared to conventionally bred rice, GM-labelled rice and 'no fungicide' rice? In this willingness-to-pay study, respondents did not view cisgenic and GM rice differently. However, participants were willing-to-pay a premium for any aforementioned rice with a 'no fungicide' attribute, which cisgenics and GM could provide. Although not significantly different (P = 0.16), 76% and 73% of respondents stated a willingness-to-consume GM and cisgenic foods, respectively.

KW - Cisgenesis

KW - Consumer acceptance

KW - Food security

KW - Genetically modified organisms

KW - India

KW - Rice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955216137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955216137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/pbi.12442

DO - 10.1111/pbi.12442

M3 - Article

C2 - 26242818

AN - SCOPUS:84955216137

VL - 14

SP - 4

EP - 7

JO - Plant Biotechnology Journal

JF - Plant Biotechnology Journal

SN - 1467-7644

IS - 1

ER -