Are rural residents willing to pay enough to improve drinking water quality?

Yongsung Cho, K. William Easter, Laura M J McCann, Frances Homans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The concentrations of iron and sulfate in community water supplies are a concern for a number of areas in southwestern Minnesota. This study used the contingent valuation method to determine how much consumers would be willing to pay to improve their drinking water quality. On average, individuals were willing to pay US$5.25 per month (in 1995 U.S. dollars) to reduce the level of iron and US$4.33 per month to reduce the level of sulfate in their water to the USEPA's secondary standards for drinking water quality. Respondents with negative perceptions of their drinking water quality were willing to pay more to improve water quality. The aggregate annual willingness to pay (WTP) for all consumers in community water systems in southwestern Minnesota that were out of compliance with water quality standards were estimated to be US$2.4 million and US$2.0 million (in 1995 dollars) for reducing the levels of iron and sulfate, respectively. Yet the total WTP of consumers who use small community water systems may not be enough to pay the full cost of providing improved water in those systems. Economies of scale in water treatment and difficulties in financing improvements mean that technical innovation, government assistance, or institutional changes may be needed to improve water quality in these areas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)729-740
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the American Water Resources Association
Volume41
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2005 Jun 1

Fingerprint

Potable water
Water quality
drinking water
water quality
willingness to pay
Iron
sulfate
iron
Water
water
economy of scale
contingent valuation
Water treatment
Water supply
compliance
water treatment
innovation
Innovation
water supply
cost

Keywords

  • Decision making
  • Drinking water quality
  • Economic valuation
  • Iron
  • Regulation
  • Rural communities
  • Sulfate
  • Water policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Are rural residents willing to pay enough to improve drinking water quality? / Cho, Yongsung; Easter, K. William; McCann, Laura M J; Homans, Frances.

In: Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 41, No. 3, 01.06.2005, p. 729-740.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cho, Yongsung ; Easter, K. William ; McCann, Laura M J ; Homans, Frances. / Are rural residents willing to pay enough to improve drinking water quality?. In: Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 2005 ; Vol. 41, No. 3. pp. 729-740.
@article{d2d577a89ba244d081bf25e8dfc2f55f,
title = "Are rural residents willing to pay enough to improve drinking water quality?",
abstract = "The concentrations of iron and sulfate in community water supplies are a concern for a number of areas in southwestern Minnesota. This study used the contingent valuation method to determine how much consumers would be willing to pay to improve their drinking water quality. On average, individuals were willing to pay US$5.25 per month (in 1995 U.S. dollars) to reduce the level of iron and US$4.33 per month to reduce the level of sulfate in their water to the USEPA's secondary standards for drinking water quality. Respondents with negative perceptions of their drinking water quality were willing to pay more to improve water quality. The aggregate annual willingness to pay (WTP) for all consumers in community water systems in southwestern Minnesota that were out of compliance with water quality standards were estimated to be US$2.4 million and US$2.0 million (in 1995 dollars) for reducing the levels of iron and sulfate, respectively. Yet the total WTP of consumers who use small community water systems may not be enough to pay the full cost of providing improved water in those systems. Economies of scale in water treatment and difficulties in financing improvements mean that technical innovation, government assistance, or institutional changes may be needed to improve water quality in these areas.",
keywords = "Decision making, Drinking water quality, Economic valuation, Iron, Regulation, Rural communities, Sulfate, Water policy",
author = "Yongsung Cho and Easter, {K. William} and McCann, {Laura M J} and Frances Homans",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "729--740",
journal = "Journal of the American Water Resources Association",
issn = "1093-474X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are rural residents willing to pay enough to improve drinking water quality?

AU - Cho, Yongsung

AU - Easter, K. William

AU - McCann, Laura M J

AU - Homans, Frances

PY - 2005/6/1

Y1 - 2005/6/1

N2 - The concentrations of iron and sulfate in community water supplies are a concern for a number of areas in southwestern Minnesota. This study used the contingent valuation method to determine how much consumers would be willing to pay to improve their drinking water quality. On average, individuals were willing to pay US$5.25 per month (in 1995 U.S. dollars) to reduce the level of iron and US$4.33 per month to reduce the level of sulfate in their water to the USEPA's secondary standards for drinking water quality. Respondents with negative perceptions of their drinking water quality were willing to pay more to improve water quality. The aggregate annual willingness to pay (WTP) for all consumers in community water systems in southwestern Minnesota that were out of compliance with water quality standards were estimated to be US$2.4 million and US$2.0 million (in 1995 dollars) for reducing the levels of iron and sulfate, respectively. Yet the total WTP of consumers who use small community water systems may not be enough to pay the full cost of providing improved water in those systems. Economies of scale in water treatment and difficulties in financing improvements mean that technical innovation, government assistance, or institutional changes may be needed to improve water quality in these areas.

AB - The concentrations of iron and sulfate in community water supplies are a concern for a number of areas in southwestern Minnesota. This study used the contingent valuation method to determine how much consumers would be willing to pay to improve their drinking water quality. On average, individuals were willing to pay US$5.25 per month (in 1995 U.S. dollars) to reduce the level of iron and US$4.33 per month to reduce the level of sulfate in their water to the USEPA's secondary standards for drinking water quality. Respondents with negative perceptions of their drinking water quality were willing to pay more to improve water quality. The aggregate annual willingness to pay (WTP) for all consumers in community water systems in southwestern Minnesota that were out of compliance with water quality standards were estimated to be US$2.4 million and US$2.0 million (in 1995 dollars) for reducing the levels of iron and sulfate, respectively. Yet the total WTP of consumers who use small community water systems may not be enough to pay the full cost of providing improved water in those systems. Economies of scale in water treatment and difficulties in financing improvements mean that technical innovation, government assistance, or institutional changes may be needed to improve water quality in these areas.

KW - Decision making

KW - Drinking water quality

KW - Economic valuation

KW - Iron

KW - Regulation

KW - Rural communities

KW - Sulfate

KW - Water policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21744455191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21744455191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:21744455191

VL - 41

SP - 729

EP - 740

JO - Journal of the American Water Resources Association

JF - Journal of the American Water Resources Association

SN - 1093-474X

IS - 3

ER -