Are UN Investigations into Human Rights Violations a Viable Solution? An Assessment of UN Commissions of Inquiry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper evaluates the activities of UN commissions of inquiry and asks whether investigations can be a viable solution to human rights violations. A case study of UN commissions of inquiry was used to evaluate the activities of commissions. The recent increase in UN commissions is significant as they could potentially be an alternative to the international accountability system. Specifically, there have been three achievements: (1) innovations in investigation methods; (2) international agenda setting; and (3) establishing grounds for accountability. However, there are still problems and issues with UN investigations that need to be overcome in the course of future developments. Three requirements were identified: (1) a balanced perspective; (2) reliable sources of information; and (3) more access to and cooperation from the target state.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)96-115
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Human Rights Practice
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Jan 1

Fingerprint

human rights violation
UNO
responsibility
source of information
innovation
Human Rights
Violations
United Nations
Accountability

Keywords

  • investigation
  • North Korea (Democratic People's Republic of Korea)
  • UN commission of inquiry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Law

Cite this

@article{501faa1447804a11b948fabce789ac81,
title = "Are UN Investigations into Human Rights Violations a Viable Solution? An Assessment of UN Commissions of Inquiry",
abstract = "This paper evaluates the activities of UN commissions of inquiry and asks whether investigations can be a viable solution to human rights violations. A case study of UN commissions of inquiry was used to evaluate the activities of commissions. The recent increase in UN commissions is significant as they could potentially be an alternative to the international accountability system. Specifically, there have been three achievements: (1) innovations in investigation methods; (2) international agenda setting; and (3) establishing grounds for accountability. However, there are still problems and issues with UN investigations that need to be overcome in the course of future developments. Three requirements were identified: (1) a balanced perspective; (2) reliable sources of information; and (3) more access to and cooperation from the target state.",
keywords = "investigation, North Korea (Democratic People's Republic of Korea), UN commission of inquiry",
author = "Kim, {Hun Joon}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jhuman/huz008",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "96--115",
journal = "Journal of Human Rights Practice",
issn = "1757-9619",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are UN Investigations into Human Rights Violations a Viable Solution? An Assessment of UN Commissions of Inquiry

AU - Kim, Hun Joon

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - This paper evaluates the activities of UN commissions of inquiry and asks whether investigations can be a viable solution to human rights violations. A case study of UN commissions of inquiry was used to evaluate the activities of commissions. The recent increase in UN commissions is significant as they could potentially be an alternative to the international accountability system. Specifically, there have been three achievements: (1) innovations in investigation methods; (2) international agenda setting; and (3) establishing grounds for accountability. However, there are still problems and issues with UN investigations that need to be overcome in the course of future developments. Three requirements were identified: (1) a balanced perspective; (2) reliable sources of information; and (3) more access to and cooperation from the target state.

AB - This paper evaluates the activities of UN commissions of inquiry and asks whether investigations can be a viable solution to human rights violations. A case study of UN commissions of inquiry was used to evaluate the activities of commissions. The recent increase in UN commissions is significant as they could potentially be an alternative to the international accountability system. Specifically, there have been three achievements: (1) innovations in investigation methods; (2) international agenda setting; and (3) establishing grounds for accountability. However, there are still problems and issues with UN investigations that need to be overcome in the course of future developments. Three requirements were identified: (1) a balanced perspective; (2) reliable sources of information; and (3) more access to and cooperation from the target state.

KW - investigation

KW - North Korea (Democratic People's Republic of Korea)

KW - UN commission of inquiry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072389294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072389294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jhuman/huz008

DO - 10.1093/jhuman/huz008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85072389294

VL - 11

SP - 96

EP - 115

JO - Journal of Human Rights Practice

JF - Journal of Human Rights Practice

SN - 1757-9619

IS - 1

ER -