Bayesian prediction of placebo analgesia in an instrumental learning model

Won Mo Jung, Ye Seul Lee, Christian Wallraven, Younbyoung Chae

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Placebo analgesia can be primarily explained by the Pavlovian conditioning paradigm in which a passively applied cue becomes associated with less pain. In contrast, instrumental conditioning employs an active paradigm that might be more similar to clinical settings. In the present study, an instrumental conditioning paradigm involving a modified trust game in a simulated clinical situation was used to induce placebo analgesia. Additionally, Bayesian modeling was applied to predict the placebo responses of individuals based on their choices. Twenty-four participants engaged in a medical trust game in which decisions to receive treatment from either a doctor (more effective with high cost) or a pharmacy (less effective with low cost) were made after receiving a reference pain stimulus. In the conditioning session, the participants received lower levels of pain following both choices, while high pain stimuli were administered in the test session even after making the decision. The choice-dependent pain in the conditioning session was modulated in terms of both intensity and uncertainty. Participants reported significantly less pain when they chose the doctor or the pharmacy for treatment compared to the control trials. The predicted pain ratings based on Bayesian modeling showed significant correlations with the actual reports from participants for both of the choice categories. The instrumental conditioning paradigm allowed for the active choice of optional cues and was able to induce the placebo analgesia effect. Additionally, Bayesian modeling successfully predicted pain ratings in a simulated clinical situation that fits well with placebo analgesia induced by instrumental conditioning.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0172609
JournalPLoS One
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Feb 1

Fingerprint

Operant Conditioning
Bayes Theorem
analgesia
Analgesia
placebos
pain
conditioned behavior
learning
Placebos
Pain
prediction
Costs
physicians
Cues
Costs and Cost Analysis
Placebo Effect
Conditioning (Psychology)
Uncertainty
decision making
Decision Making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Bayesian prediction of placebo analgesia in an instrumental learning model. / Jung, Won Mo; Lee, Ye Seul; Wallraven, Christian; Chae, Younbyoung.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 12, No. 2, e0172609, 01.02.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jung, Won Mo ; Lee, Ye Seul ; Wallraven, Christian ; Chae, Younbyoung. / Bayesian prediction of placebo analgesia in an instrumental learning model. In: PLoS One. 2017 ; Vol. 12, No. 2.
@article{8f361634fcfe45a4b829faeafaf965f1,
title = "Bayesian prediction of placebo analgesia in an instrumental learning model",
abstract = "Placebo analgesia can be primarily explained by the Pavlovian conditioning paradigm in which a passively applied cue becomes associated with less pain. In contrast, instrumental conditioning employs an active paradigm that might be more similar to clinical settings. In the present study, an instrumental conditioning paradigm involving a modified trust game in a simulated clinical situation was used to induce placebo analgesia. Additionally, Bayesian modeling was applied to predict the placebo responses of individuals based on their choices. Twenty-four participants engaged in a medical trust game in which decisions to receive treatment from either a doctor (more effective with high cost) or a pharmacy (less effective with low cost) were made after receiving a reference pain stimulus. In the conditioning session, the participants received lower levels of pain following both choices, while high pain stimuli were administered in the test session even after making the decision. The choice-dependent pain in the conditioning session was modulated in terms of both intensity and uncertainty. Participants reported significantly less pain when they chose the doctor or the pharmacy for treatment compared to the control trials. The predicted pain ratings based on Bayesian modeling showed significant correlations with the actual reports from participants for both of the choice categories. The instrumental conditioning paradigm allowed for the active choice of optional cues and was able to induce the placebo analgesia effect. Additionally, Bayesian modeling successfully predicted pain ratings in a simulated clinical situation that fits well with placebo analgesia induced by instrumental conditioning.",
author = "Jung, {Won Mo} and Lee, {Ye Seul} and Christian Wallraven and Younbyoung Chae",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0172609",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bayesian prediction of placebo analgesia in an instrumental learning model

AU - Jung, Won Mo

AU - Lee, Ye Seul

AU - Wallraven, Christian

AU - Chae, Younbyoung

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Placebo analgesia can be primarily explained by the Pavlovian conditioning paradigm in which a passively applied cue becomes associated with less pain. In contrast, instrumental conditioning employs an active paradigm that might be more similar to clinical settings. In the present study, an instrumental conditioning paradigm involving a modified trust game in a simulated clinical situation was used to induce placebo analgesia. Additionally, Bayesian modeling was applied to predict the placebo responses of individuals based on their choices. Twenty-four participants engaged in a medical trust game in which decisions to receive treatment from either a doctor (more effective with high cost) or a pharmacy (less effective with low cost) were made after receiving a reference pain stimulus. In the conditioning session, the participants received lower levels of pain following both choices, while high pain stimuli were administered in the test session even after making the decision. The choice-dependent pain in the conditioning session was modulated in terms of both intensity and uncertainty. Participants reported significantly less pain when they chose the doctor or the pharmacy for treatment compared to the control trials. The predicted pain ratings based on Bayesian modeling showed significant correlations with the actual reports from participants for both of the choice categories. The instrumental conditioning paradigm allowed for the active choice of optional cues and was able to induce the placebo analgesia effect. Additionally, Bayesian modeling successfully predicted pain ratings in a simulated clinical situation that fits well with placebo analgesia induced by instrumental conditioning.

AB - Placebo analgesia can be primarily explained by the Pavlovian conditioning paradigm in which a passively applied cue becomes associated with less pain. In contrast, instrumental conditioning employs an active paradigm that might be more similar to clinical settings. In the present study, an instrumental conditioning paradigm involving a modified trust game in a simulated clinical situation was used to induce placebo analgesia. Additionally, Bayesian modeling was applied to predict the placebo responses of individuals based on their choices. Twenty-four participants engaged in a medical trust game in which decisions to receive treatment from either a doctor (more effective with high cost) or a pharmacy (less effective with low cost) were made after receiving a reference pain stimulus. In the conditioning session, the participants received lower levels of pain following both choices, while high pain stimuli were administered in the test session even after making the decision. The choice-dependent pain in the conditioning session was modulated in terms of both intensity and uncertainty. Participants reported significantly less pain when they chose the doctor or the pharmacy for treatment compared to the control trials. The predicted pain ratings based on Bayesian modeling showed significant correlations with the actual reports from participants for both of the choice categories. The instrumental conditioning paradigm allowed for the active choice of optional cues and was able to induce the placebo analgesia effect. Additionally, Bayesian modeling successfully predicted pain ratings in a simulated clinical situation that fits well with placebo analgesia induced by instrumental conditioning.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013477818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013477818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0172609

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0172609

M3 - Article

C2 - 28225816

AN - SCOPUS:85013477818

VL - 12

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 2

M1 - e0172609

ER -