TY - JOUR
T1 - Best available technique for the recovery of marine benthic communities in a gravel shore after the oil spill
T2 - A mesocosm-based sediment triad assessment
AU - Kim, Taewoo
AU - Lee, Changkeun
AU - Lee, Junghyun
AU - Bae, Hanna
AU - Noh, Junsung
AU - Hong, Seongjin
AU - Kwon, Bong Oh
AU - Kim, Jae Jin
AU - Yim, Un Hyuk
AU - Chang, Gap Soo
AU - Giesy, John P.
AU - Khim, Jong Seong
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the projects entitled “Development of Advanced Science and Technology for Marine Environmental Impact Assessment (20210427)” funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries of Korea (MOF) granted to JSK. JPG was supported by the Canada Research Chair program, a Distinguished Visiting Professorship in the Department of Environmental Sciences, Baylor University in Waco, TX, USA.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/8/5
Y1 - 2022/8/5
N2 - Ecotoxicological effects of spilled oils are well documented, but study of recovery of marine benthic communities is limited. Long-term recovery of hard bottom communities during physical and biological remediations after a spill was monitored. A 60-day experiment was conducted using a mesocosm with monitoring of eight endpoints by use of the sediment quality triad (SQT). First, physical treatment of hot water + high pressure flushing maximally removed residual oils (max=93%), showing the greatest recovery among SQT variables (mean=72%). Physical cleanup generally involved adverse effects such as depression of the microphytobenthic community during the initial period. Next, biological treatments, such as fertilizer, emulsifier, enzyme and augmentation of the microbes, all facilitated removal of oil (max=66%) enhancing ecological recovery. Analysis of the microbiome confirmed that oil-degrading bacteria, such as Dietzia sp. and Rosevarius sp. were present. A mixed bioremediation, including fertilizer + multi-enzyme + microbes (FMeM) maximized efficacy of remediation as indicated by SQT parameters (mean=47%). Natural attenuation with “no treatment” showed comparable recovery to other remediations. Considering economic availability, environmental performance, and technical applicability, of currently available techniques, combined treatments of physical removal via hand wiping followed by FMeM could be most effective for recovery of the rocky shore benthic community.
AB - Ecotoxicological effects of spilled oils are well documented, but study of recovery of marine benthic communities is limited. Long-term recovery of hard bottom communities during physical and biological remediations after a spill was monitored. A 60-day experiment was conducted using a mesocosm with monitoring of eight endpoints by use of the sediment quality triad (SQT). First, physical treatment of hot water + high pressure flushing maximally removed residual oils (max=93%), showing the greatest recovery among SQT variables (mean=72%). Physical cleanup generally involved adverse effects such as depression of the microphytobenthic community during the initial period. Next, biological treatments, such as fertilizer, emulsifier, enzyme and augmentation of the microbes, all facilitated removal of oil (max=66%) enhancing ecological recovery. Analysis of the microbiome confirmed that oil-degrading bacteria, such as Dietzia sp. and Rosevarius sp. were present. A mixed bioremediation, including fertilizer + multi-enzyme + microbes (FMeM) maximized efficacy of remediation as indicated by SQT parameters (mean=47%). Natural attenuation with “no treatment” showed comparable recovery to other remediations. Considering economic availability, environmental performance, and technical applicability, of currently available techniques, combined treatments of physical removal via hand wiping followed by FMeM could be most effective for recovery of the rocky shore benthic community.
KW - Benthic community response
KW - Biological recovery
KW - Ecological restoration
KW - Natural attenuation
KW - Physical cleanup
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129339532&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128945
DO - 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128945
M3 - Article
C2 - 35500340
AN - SCOPUS:85129339532
SN - 0304-3894
VL - 435
JO - Journal of Hazardous Materials
JF - Journal of Hazardous Materials
M1 - 128945
ER -