Bias from Rainfall Spatial Distribution in the Application of Areal Reduction Factor

Jinwook Lee, Kyunho Park, Chulsang Yoo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There are many different approaches for deriving Areal Reduction Factor (ARF); however, only three methods (Methods (1), (2) and (3)) have been developed for the application of ARF. In Method (1), the ARF estimated for the entire basin is applied to all the sub-basins, and in Method (2), the ARF of a sub-basin is independently estimated by considering its sub-basin area. Finally, in Method (3), the ARF is estimated by considering the accumulated area up to the point of determination of the design flood. In this study, these three methods are evaluated by their bias involved in the estimation of runoff peak flow. This evaluation is based on the design flood at the exit of each sub-basin and the entire basin. For this purpose, a total of 50 realistic rainfall spatial distributions were generated by considering the shape, orientation and center of a storm and applied to the estimation of realistic runoff peak flow. This study considered the Chungju Dam Basin as a study basin, which is located at the center of the Korean Peninsula. As a result, it was found that Method (3) is most reasonable, with the negative bias of just 5% or less.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5229-5241
Number of pages13
JournalKSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
Volume22
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Spatial distribution
Rain
Runoff
Dams

Keywords

  • areal reduction factor
  • Chungju Dam Basin
  • storm center
  • storm shape

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Cite this

Bias from Rainfall Spatial Distribution in the Application of Areal Reduction Factor. / Lee, Jinwook; Park, Kyunho; Yoo, Chulsang.

In: KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 12, 01.12.2018, p. 5229-5241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4a5e020b892048fa91f0a2997162f3ef,
title = "Bias from Rainfall Spatial Distribution in the Application of Areal Reduction Factor",
abstract = "There are many different approaches for deriving Areal Reduction Factor (ARF); however, only three methods (Methods (1), (2) and (3)) have been developed for the application of ARF. In Method (1), the ARF estimated for the entire basin is applied to all the sub-basins, and in Method (2), the ARF of a sub-basin is independently estimated by considering its sub-basin area. Finally, in Method (3), the ARF is estimated by considering the accumulated area up to the point of determination of the design flood. In this study, these three methods are evaluated by their bias involved in the estimation of runoff peak flow. This evaluation is based on the design flood at the exit of each sub-basin and the entire basin. For this purpose, a total of 50 realistic rainfall spatial distributions were generated by considering the shape, orientation and center of a storm and applied to the estimation of realistic runoff peak flow. This study considered the Chungju Dam Basin as a study basin, which is located at the center of the Korean Peninsula. As a result, it was found that Method (3) is most reasonable, with the negative bias of just 5{\%} or less.",
keywords = "areal reduction factor, Chungju Dam Basin, storm center, storm shape",
author = "Jinwook Lee and Kyunho Park and Chulsang Yoo",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12205-017-1773-5",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "5229--5241",
journal = "KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering",
issn = "1226-7988",
publisher = "Korean Society of Civil Engineers",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bias from Rainfall Spatial Distribution in the Application of Areal Reduction Factor

AU - Lee, Jinwook

AU - Park, Kyunho

AU - Yoo, Chulsang

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - There are many different approaches for deriving Areal Reduction Factor (ARF); however, only three methods (Methods (1), (2) and (3)) have been developed for the application of ARF. In Method (1), the ARF estimated for the entire basin is applied to all the sub-basins, and in Method (2), the ARF of a sub-basin is independently estimated by considering its sub-basin area. Finally, in Method (3), the ARF is estimated by considering the accumulated area up to the point of determination of the design flood. In this study, these three methods are evaluated by their bias involved in the estimation of runoff peak flow. This evaluation is based on the design flood at the exit of each sub-basin and the entire basin. For this purpose, a total of 50 realistic rainfall spatial distributions were generated by considering the shape, orientation and center of a storm and applied to the estimation of realistic runoff peak flow. This study considered the Chungju Dam Basin as a study basin, which is located at the center of the Korean Peninsula. As a result, it was found that Method (3) is most reasonable, with the negative bias of just 5% or less.

AB - There are many different approaches for deriving Areal Reduction Factor (ARF); however, only three methods (Methods (1), (2) and (3)) have been developed for the application of ARF. In Method (1), the ARF estimated for the entire basin is applied to all the sub-basins, and in Method (2), the ARF of a sub-basin is independently estimated by considering its sub-basin area. Finally, in Method (3), the ARF is estimated by considering the accumulated area up to the point of determination of the design flood. In this study, these three methods are evaluated by their bias involved in the estimation of runoff peak flow. This evaluation is based on the design flood at the exit of each sub-basin and the entire basin. For this purpose, a total of 50 realistic rainfall spatial distributions were generated by considering the shape, orientation and center of a storm and applied to the estimation of realistic runoff peak flow. This study considered the Chungju Dam Basin as a study basin, which is located at the center of the Korean Peninsula. As a result, it was found that Method (3) is most reasonable, with the negative bias of just 5% or less.

KW - areal reduction factor

KW - Chungju Dam Basin

KW - storm center

KW - storm shape

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056484743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056484743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12205-017-1773-5

DO - 10.1007/s12205-017-1773-5

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 5229

EP - 5241

JO - KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

JF - KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

SN - 1226-7988

IS - 12

ER -