Biochar-mediated sorption of antibiotics in pig manure

A. N. Ngigi, Yong Sik Ok, S. Thiele-Bruhn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Using manure contaminated with antibiotics as fertilizer is a primary source of soil pollution with antibiotics and concomitantly with antibiotic resistance genes (ARG). Bioavailable antibiotics trigger further ARG amplification during manure storage. Consequently it is aimed to facilitate the immobilization of antibiotics in manure. To this end, five biochars derived from pine cone (BCP), rice husk, sewage sludge, digestate and Miscanthus were tested as additional sorbents in liquid pig manure for sulfamethazine, ciprofloxacin, oxytetracycline and florfenicol. Non-linear sorption was best-fit using the Freundlich isotherm (R2 > 0.82) and the pseudo-second-order model best described sorption kinetics (R2 > 0.94). Antibiotics’ sorption onto manure increased in the order sulfamethazine < florfenicol < ciprofloxacin < oxytetracycline. Admixtures of BCP to manure changed the order to sulfamethazine < oxytetracycline < florfenicol = ciprofloxacin. Generally, with the addition of biochar, sorption coefficients of florfenicol increased most (by factors>2.7) followed by sulfamethazine and ciprofloxacin. Yet, oxytetracycline was mostly mobilized probably due to competitive adsorption. Effects depended on the proportion of biochar added and the type of biochar, whereby plant-derived biochar exhibited better immobilization of antibiotics. Depending on the type and portion of biochar, admixtures to manure can be used to lower the mobility and hence bioavailability of fenicols, fluoroquinolones and sulfonamides.

LanguageEnglish
Pages663-670
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Hazardous Materials
Volume364
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Feb 15

Fingerprint

Manure
Manures
Antibiotics
pig
antibiotics
Sorption
manure
Swine
sorption
Sulfamethazine
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Oxytetracycline
oxytetracycline
antibiotic resistance
Ciprofloxacin
Microbial Drug Resistance
Sewage
Immobilization
immobilization
Environmental Pollution

Keywords

  • Antibiotics
  • Biochar
  • Competitive sorption
  • Pig slurry
  • Sorption kinetics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Pollution
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Biochar-mediated sorption of antibiotics in pig manure. / Ngigi, A. N.; Ok, Yong Sik; Thiele-Bruhn, S.

In: Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 364, 15.02.2019, p. 663-670.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ngigi, A. N. ; Ok, Yong Sik ; Thiele-Bruhn, S. / Biochar-mediated sorption of antibiotics in pig manure. In: Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2019 ; Vol. 364. pp. 663-670.
@article{66544015952c4872aba4c9937a355479,
title = "Biochar-mediated sorption of antibiotics in pig manure",
abstract = "Using manure contaminated with antibiotics as fertilizer is a primary source of soil pollution with antibiotics and concomitantly with antibiotic resistance genes (ARG). Bioavailable antibiotics trigger further ARG amplification during manure storage. Consequently it is aimed to facilitate the immobilization of antibiotics in manure. To this end, five biochars derived from pine cone (BCP), rice husk, sewage sludge, digestate and Miscanthus were tested as additional sorbents in liquid pig manure for sulfamethazine, ciprofloxacin, oxytetracycline and florfenicol. Non-linear sorption was best-fit using the Freundlich isotherm (R2 > 0.82) and the pseudo-second-order model best described sorption kinetics (R2 > 0.94). Antibiotics’ sorption onto manure increased in the order sulfamethazine < florfenicol < ciprofloxacin < oxytetracycline. Admixtures of BCP to manure changed the order to sulfamethazine < oxytetracycline < florfenicol = ciprofloxacin. Generally, with the addition of biochar, sorption coefficients of florfenicol increased most (by factors>2.7) followed by sulfamethazine and ciprofloxacin. Yet, oxytetracycline was mostly mobilized probably due to competitive adsorption. Effects depended on the proportion of biochar added and the type of biochar, whereby plant-derived biochar exhibited better immobilization of antibiotics. Depending on the type and portion of biochar, admixtures to manure can be used to lower the mobility and hence bioavailability of fenicols, fluoroquinolones and sulfonamides.",
keywords = "Antibiotics, Biochar, Competitive sorption, Pig slurry, Sorption kinetics",
author = "Ngigi, {A. N.} and Ok, {Yong Sik} and S. Thiele-Bruhn",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.045",
language = "English",
volume = "364",
pages = "663--670",
journal = "Journal of Hazardous Materials",
issn = "0304-3894",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biochar-mediated sorption of antibiotics in pig manure

AU - Ngigi, A. N.

AU - Ok, Yong Sik

AU - Thiele-Bruhn, S.

PY - 2019/2/15

Y1 - 2019/2/15

N2 - Using manure contaminated with antibiotics as fertilizer is a primary source of soil pollution with antibiotics and concomitantly with antibiotic resistance genes (ARG). Bioavailable antibiotics trigger further ARG amplification during manure storage. Consequently it is aimed to facilitate the immobilization of antibiotics in manure. To this end, five biochars derived from pine cone (BCP), rice husk, sewage sludge, digestate and Miscanthus were tested as additional sorbents in liquid pig manure for sulfamethazine, ciprofloxacin, oxytetracycline and florfenicol. Non-linear sorption was best-fit using the Freundlich isotherm (R2 > 0.82) and the pseudo-second-order model best described sorption kinetics (R2 > 0.94). Antibiotics’ sorption onto manure increased in the order sulfamethazine < florfenicol < ciprofloxacin < oxytetracycline. Admixtures of BCP to manure changed the order to sulfamethazine < oxytetracycline < florfenicol = ciprofloxacin. Generally, with the addition of biochar, sorption coefficients of florfenicol increased most (by factors>2.7) followed by sulfamethazine and ciprofloxacin. Yet, oxytetracycline was mostly mobilized probably due to competitive adsorption. Effects depended on the proportion of biochar added and the type of biochar, whereby plant-derived biochar exhibited better immobilization of antibiotics. Depending on the type and portion of biochar, admixtures to manure can be used to lower the mobility and hence bioavailability of fenicols, fluoroquinolones and sulfonamides.

AB - Using manure contaminated with antibiotics as fertilizer is a primary source of soil pollution with antibiotics and concomitantly with antibiotic resistance genes (ARG). Bioavailable antibiotics trigger further ARG amplification during manure storage. Consequently it is aimed to facilitate the immobilization of antibiotics in manure. To this end, five biochars derived from pine cone (BCP), rice husk, sewage sludge, digestate and Miscanthus were tested as additional sorbents in liquid pig manure for sulfamethazine, ciprofloxacin, oxytetracycline and florfenicol. Non-linear sorption was best-fit using the Freundlich isotherm (R2 > 0.82) and the pseudo-second-order model best described sorption kinetics (R2 > 0.94). Antibiotics’ sorption onto manure increased in the order sulfamethazine < florfenicol < ciprofloxacin < oxytetracycline. Admixtures of BCP to manure changed the order to sulfamethazine < oxytetracycline < florfenicol = ciprofloxacin. Generally, with the addition of biochar, sorption coefficients of florfenicol increased most (by factors>2.7) followed by sulfamethazine and ciprofloxacin. Yet, oxytetracycline was mostly mobilized probably due to competitive adsorption. Effects depended on the proportion of biochar added and the type of biochar, whereby plant-derived biochar exhibited better immobilization of antibiotics. Depending on the type and portion of biochar, admixtures to manure can be used to lower the mobility and hence bioavailability of fenicols, fluoroquinolones and sulfonamides.

KW - Antibiotics

KW - Biochar

KW - Competitive sorption

KW - Pig slurry

KW - Sorption kinetics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055887158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055887158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.045

DO - 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.045

M3 - Article

VL - 364

SP - 663

EP - 670

JO - Journal of Hazardous Materials

T2 - Journal of Hazardous Materials

JF - Journal of Hazardous Materials

SN - 0304-3894

ER -