Biomechanically Preferred Consonant-Vowel Combinations Fail to Appear in Adult Spoken Corpora

D. H. Whalen, Sara Giulivi, Hosung Nam, Andrea G. Levitt, Pierre Hallé, Louis M. Goldstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Certain consonant/vowel (CV) combinations are more frequent than would be expected from the individual C and V frequencies alone, both in babbling and, to a lesser extent, in adult language, based on dictionary counts: Labial consonants co-occur with central vowels more often than chance would dictate; coronals co-occur with front vowels, and velars with back vowels (Davis & MacNeilage, 1994). Plausible biomechanical explanations have been proposed, but it is also possible that infants are mirroring the frequency of the CVs that they hear. As noted, previous assessments of adult language were based on dictionaries; these "type" counts are incommensurate with the babbling measures, which are necessarily "token" counts. We analyzed the tokens in two spoken corpora for English, two for French and one for Mandarin. We found that the adult spoken CV preferences correlated with the type counts for Mandarin and French, not for English. Correlations between the adult spoken corpora and the babbling results had all three possible outcomes: significantly positive (French), uncorrelated (Mandarin), and significantly negative (English). There were no correlations of the dictionary data with the babbling results when we consider all nine combinations of consonants and vowels. The results indicate that spoken frequencies of CV combinations can differ from dictionary (type) counts and that the CV preferences apparent in babbling are biomechanically driven and can ignore the frequencies of CVs in the ambient spoken language.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)503-515
Number of pages13
JournalLanguage and Speech
Volume55
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Dec 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

dictionary
Language
spoken language
Lip
language
infant
Babbling
Consonant
Spoken Corpora
Dictionary
Adult Language

Keywords

  • Articulatory Phonology
  • Frame then Content
  • phonotactics
  • type/token
  • word frequency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Biomechanically Preferred Consonant-Vowel Combinations Fail to Appear in Adult Spoken Corpora. / Whalen, D. H.; Giulivi, Sara; Nam, Hosung; Levitt, Andrea G.; Hallé, Pierre; Goldstein, Louis M.

In: Language and Speech, Vol. 55, No. 4, 01.12.2012, p. 503-515.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Whalen, D. H. ; Giulivi, Sara ; Nam, Hosung ; Levitt, Andrea G. ; Hallé, Pierre ; Goldstein, Louis M. / Biomechanically Preferred Consonant-Vowel Combinations Fail to Appear in Adult Spoken Corpora. In: Language and Speech. 2012 ; Vol. 55, No. 4. pp. 503-515.
@article{3c80347ed13b496a9f8d49e02073f651,
title = "Biomechanically Preferred Consonant-Vowel Combinations Fail to Appear in Adult Spoken Corpora",
abstract = "Certain consonant/vowel (CV) combinations are more frequent than would be expected from the individual C and V frequencies alone, both in babbling and, to a lesser extent, in adult language, based on dictionary counts: Labial consonants co-occur with central vowels more often than chance would dictate; coronals co-occur with front vowels, and velars with back vowels (Davis & MacNeilage, 1994). Plausible biomechanical explanations have been proposed, but it is also possible that infants are mirroring the frequency of the CVs that they hear. As noted, previous assessments of adult language were based on dictionaries; these {"}type{"} counts are incommensurate with the babbling measures, which are necessarily {"}token{"} counts. We analyzed the tokens in two spoken corpora for English, two for French and one for Mandarin. We found that the adult spoken CV preferences correlated with the type counts for Mandarin and French, not for English. Correlations between the adult spoken corpora and the babbling results had all three possible outcomes: significantly positive (French), uncorrelated (Mandarin), and significantly negative (English). There were no correlations of the dictionary data with the babbling results when we consider all nine combinations of consonants and vowels. The results indicate that spoken frequencies of CV combinations can differ from dictionary (type) counts and that the CV preferences apparent in babbling are biomechanically driven and can ignore the frequencies of CVs in the ambient spoken language.",
keywords = "Articulatory Phonology, Frame then Content, phonotactics, type/token, word frequency",
author = "Whalen, {D. H.} and Sara Giulivi and Hosung Nam and Levitt, {Andrea G.} and Pierre Hall{\'e} and Goldstein, {Louis M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0023830911434123",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "503--515",
journal = "Language and Speech",
issn = "0023-8309",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomechanically Preferred Consonant-Vowel Combinations Fail to Appear in Adult Spoken Corpora

AU - Whalen, D. H.

AU - Giulivi, Sara

AU - Nam, Hosung

AU - Levitt, Andrea G.

AU - Hallé, Pierre

AU - Goldstein, Louis M.

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - Certain consonant/vowel (CV) combinations are more frequent than would be expected from the individual C and V frequencies alone, both in babbling and, to a lesser extent, in adult language, based on dictionary counts: Labial consonants co-occur with central vowels more often than chance would dictate; coronals co-occur with front vowels, and velars with back vowels (Davis & MacNeilage, 1994). Plausible biomechanical explanations have been proposed, but it is also possible that infants are mirroring the frequency of the CVs that they hear. As noted, previous assessments of adult language were based on dictionaries; these "type" counts are incommensurate with the babbling measures, which are necessarily "token" counts. We analyzed the tokens in two spoken corpora for English, two for French and one for Mandarin. We found that the adult spoken CV preferences correlated with the type counts for Mandarin and French, not for English. Correlations between the adult spoken corpora and the babbling results had all three possible outcomes: significantly positive (French), uncorrelated (Mandarin), and significantly negative (English). There were no correlations of the dictionary data with the babbling results when we consider all nine combinations of consonants and vowels. The results indicate that spoken frequencies of CV combinations can differ from dictionary (type) counts and that the CV preferences apparent in babbling are biomechanically driven and can ignore the frequencies of CVs in the ambient spoken language.

AB - Certain consonant/vowel (CV) combinations are more frequent than would be expected from the individual C and V frequencies alone, both in babbling and, to a lesser extent, in adult language, based on dictionary counts: Labial consonants co-occur with central vowels more often than chance would dictate; coronals co-occur with front vowels, and velars with back vowels (Davis & MacNeilage, 1994). Plausible biomechanical explanations have been proposed, but it is also possible that infants are mirroring the frequency of the CVs that they hear. As noted, previous assessments of adult language were based on dictionaries; these "type" counts are incommensurate with the babbling measures, which are necessarily "token" counts. We analyzed the tokens in two spoken corpora for English, two for French and one for Mandarin. We found that the adult spoken CV preferences correlated with the type counts for Mandarin and French, not for English. Correlations between the adult spoken corpora and the babbling results had all three possible outcomes: significantly positive (French), uncorrelated (Mandarin), and significantly negative (English). There were no correlations of the dictionary data with the babbling results when we consider all nine combinations of consonants and vowels. The results indicate that spoken frequencies of CV combinations can differ from dictionary (type) counts and that the CV preferences apparent in babbling are biomechanically driven and can ignore the frequencies of CVs in the ambient spoken language.

KW - Articulatory Phonology

KW - Frame then Content

KW - phonotactics

KW - type/token

KW - word frequency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869767188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869767188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0023830911434123

DO - 10.1177/0023830911434123

M3 - Article

C2 - 23420980

AN - SCOPUS:84869767188

VL - 55

SP - 503

EP - 515

JO - Language and Speech

JF - Language and Speech

SN - 0023-8309

IS - 4

ER -