Body-relative horizontal–vertical anisotropy in human representations of traveled distances

Thomas Hinterecker, Paolo Pretto, Ksander N. de Winkel, Hans Otto Karnath, Heinrich Bulthoff, Tobias Meilinger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A growing number of studies investigated anisotropies in representations of horizontal and vertical spaces. In humans, compelling evidence for such anisotropies exists for representations of multi-floor buildings. In contrast, evidence regarding open spaces is indecisive. Our study aimed at further enhancing the understanding of horizontal and vertical spatial representations in open spaces utilizing a simple traveled distance estimation paradigm. Blindfolded participants were moved along various directions in the sagittal plane. Subsequently, participants passively reproduced the traveled distance from memory. Participants performed this task in an upright and in a 30° backward-pitch orientation. The accuracy of distance estimates in the upright orientation showed a horizontal–vertical anisotropy, with higher accuracy along the horizontal axis compared with the vertical axis. The backward-pitch orientation enabled us to investigate whether this anisotropy was body or earth-centered. The accuracy patterns of the upright condition were positively correlated with the body-relative (not the earth-relative) coordinate mapping of the backward-pitch condition, suggesting a body-centered anisotropy. Overall, this is consistent with findings on motion perception. It suggests that the distance estimation sub-process of path integration is subject to horizontal–vertical anisotropy. Based on the previous studies that showed isotropy in open spaces, we speculate that real physical self-movements or categorical versus isometric encoding are crucial factors for (an)isotropies in spatial representations.

Original languageEnglish
JournalExperimental Brain Research
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2018 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Anisotropy
Motion Perception

Keywords

  • Anisotropy
  • Body-centered
  • Horizontal
  • Motion simulator
  • Traveled distances
  • Vertical

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Body-relative horizontal–vertical anisotropy in human representations of traveled distances. / Hinterecker, Thomas; Pretto, Paolo; de Winkel, Ksander N.; Karnath, Hans Otto; Bulthoff, Heinrich; Meilinger, Tobias.

In: Experimental Brain Research, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hinterecker, Thomas ; Pretto, Paolo ; de Winkel, Ksander N. ; Karnath, Hans Otto ; Bulthoff, Heinrich ; Meilinger, Tobias. / Body-relative horizontal–vertical anisotropy in human representations of traveled distances. In: Experimental Brain Research. 2018.
@article{958e3d21da6d4cfea4aa674bd19701da,
title = "Body-relative horizontal–vertical anisotropy in human representations of traveled distances",
abstract = "A growing number of studies investigated anisotropies in representations of horizontal and vertical spaces. In humans, compelling evidence for such anisotropies exists for representations of multi-floor buildings. In contrast, evidence regarding open spaces is indecisive. Our study aimed at further enhancing the understanding of horizontal and vertical spatial representations in open spaces utilizing a simple traveled distance estimation paradigm. Blindfolded participants were moved along various directions in the sagittal plane. Subsequently, participants passively reproduced the traveled distance from memory. Participants performed this task in an upright and in a 30° backward-pitch orientation. The accuracy of distance estimates in the upright orientation showed a horizontal–vertical anisotropy, with higher accuracy along the horizontal axis compared with the vertical axis. The backward-pitch orientation enabled us to investigate whether this anisotropy was body or earth-centered. The accuracy patterns of the upright condition were positively correlated with the body-relative (not the earth-relative) coordinate mapping of the backward-pitch condition, suggesting a body-centered anisotropy. Overall, this is consistent with findings on motion perception. It suggests that the distance estimation sub-process of path integration is subject to horizontal–vertical anisotropy. Based on the previous studies that showed isotropy in open spaces, we speculate that real physical self-movements or categorical versus isometric encoding are crucial factors for (an)isotropies in spatial representations.",
keywords = "Anisotropy, Body-centered, Horizontal, Motion simulator, Traveled distances, Vertical",
author = "Thomas Hinterecker and Paolo Pretto and {de Winkel}, {Ksander N.} and Karnath, {Hans Otto} and Heinrich Bulthoff and Tobias Meilinger",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00221-018-5337-9",
language = "English",
journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Body-relative horizontal–vertical anisotropy in human representations of traveled distances

AU - Hinterecker, Thomas

AU - Pretto, Paolo

AU - de Winkel, Ksander N.

AU - Karnath, Hans Otto

AU - Bulthoff, Heinrich

AU - Meilinger, Tobias

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - A growing number of studies investigated anisotropies in representations of horizontal and vertical spaces. In humans, compelling evidence for such anisotropies exists for representations of multi-floor buildings. In contrast, evidence regarding open spaces is indecisive. Our study aimed at further enhancing the understanding of horizontal and vertical spatial representations in open spaces utilizing a simple traveled distance estimation paradigm. Blindfolded participants were moved along various directions in the sagittal plane. Subsequently, participants passively reproduced the traveled distance from memory. Participants performed this task in an upright and in a 30° backward-pitch orientation. The accuracy of distance estimates in the upright orientation showed a horizontal–vertical anisotropy, with higher accuracy along the horizontal axis compared with the vertical axis. The backward-pitch orientation enabled us to investigate whether this anisotropy was body or earth-centered. The accuracy patterns of the upright condition were positively correlated with the body-relative (not the earth-relative) coordinate mapping of the backward-pitch condition, suggesting a body-centered anisotropy. Overall, this is consistent with findings on motion perception. It suggests that the distance estimation sub-process of path integration is subject to horizontal–vertical anisotropy. Based on the previous studies that showed isotropy in open spaces, we speculate that real physical self-movements or categorical versus isometric encoding are crucial factors for (an)isotropies in spatial representations.

AB - A growing number of studies investigated anisotropies in representations of horizontal and vertical spaces. In humans, compelling evidence for such anisotropies exists for representations of multi-floor buildings. In contrast, evidence regarding open spaces is indecisive. Our study aimed at further enhancing the understanding of horizontal and vertical spatial representations in open spaces utilizing a simple traveled distance estimation paradigm. Blindfolded participants were moved along various directions in the sagittal plane. Subsequently, participants passively reproduced the traveled distance from memory. Participants performed this task in an upright and in a 30° backward-pitch orientation. The accuracy of distance estimates in the upright orientation showed a horizontal–vertical anisotropy, with higher accuracy along the horizontal axis compared with the vertical axis. The backward-pitch orientation enabled us to investigate whether this anisotropy was body or earth-centered. The accuracy patterns of the upright condition were positively correlated with the body-relative (not the earth-relative) coordinate mapping of the backward-pitch condition, suggesting a body-centered anisotropy. Overall, this is consistent with findings on motion perception. It suggests that the distance estimation sub-process of path integration is subject to horizontal–vertical anisotropy. Based on the previous studies that showed isotropy in open spaces, we speculate that real physical self-movements or categorical versus isometric encoding are crucial factors for (an)isotropies in spatial representations.

KW - Anisotropy

KW - Body-centered

KW - Horizontal

KW - Motion simulator

KW - Traveled distances

KW - Vertical

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050283944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050283944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00221-018-5337-9

DO - 10.1007/s00221-018-5337-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 30030590

AN - SCOPUS:85050283944

JO - Experimental Brain Research

JF - Experimental Brain Research

SN - 0014-4819

ER -