Brain synchronization during perception of facial emotional expressions with natural and unnatural dynamics

Dionysios Perdikis, Jakob Volhard, Viktor Müller, Kathrin Kaulard, Timothy R. Brick, Christian Wallraven, Ulman Lindenberger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Research on the perception of facial emotional expressions (FEEs) often uses static images that do not capture the dynamic character of social coordination in natural settings. Recent behavioral and neuroimaging studies suggest that dynamic FEEs (videos or morphs) enhance emotion perception. To identify mechanisms associated with the perception of FEEs with natural dynamics, the present EEG (Electroencephalography)study compared (i) ecologically valid stimuli of angry and happy FEEs with natural dynamics to (ii) FEEs with unnatural dynamics, and to (iii) static FEEs. FEEs with unnatural dynamics showed faces moving in a biologically possible but unpredictable and atypical manner, generally resulting in ambivalent emotional content. Participants were asked to explicitly recognize FEEs. Using whole power (WP) and phase synchrony (Phase Locking Index, PLI), we found that brain responses discriminated between natural and unnatural FEEs (both static and dynamic). Differences were primarily observed in the timing and brain topographies of delta and theta PLI and WP, and in alpha and beta WP. Our results support the view that biologically plausible, albeit atypical, FEEs are processed by the brain by different mechanisms than natural FEEs. We conclude that natural movement dynamics are essential for the perception of FEEs and the associated brain processes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e0181225
JournalPLoS One
Volume12
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Facial Expression
Brain
Synchronization
brain
Neuroimaging
electroencephalography
emotions
Electroencephalography
morphs
Topography
topography
Emotions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Brain synchronization during perception of facial emotional expressions with natural and unnatural dynamics. / Perdikis, Dionysios; Volhard, Jakob; Müller, Viktor; Kaulard, Kathrin; Brick, Timothy R.; Wallraven, Christian; Lindenberger, Ulman.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 12, No. 7, 2017, p. e0181225.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Perdikis, D, Volhard, J, Müller, V, Kaulard, K, Brick, TR, Wallraven, C & Lindenberger, U 2017, 'Brain synchronization during perception of facial emotional expressions with natural and unnatural dynamics', PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. e0181225. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181225
Perdikis, Dionysios ; Volhard, Jakob ; Müller, Viktor ; Kaulard, Kathrin ; Brick, Timothy R. ; Wallraven, Christian ; Lindenberger, Ulman. / Brain synchronization during perception of facial emotional expressions with natural and unnatural dynamics. In: PLoS One. 2017 ; Vol. 12, No. 7. pp. e0181225.
@article{03f0ddaf8bee4db696d29e718ffb766a,
title = "Brain synchronization during perception of facial emotional expressions with natural and unnatural dynamics",
abstract = "Research on the perception of facial emotional expressions (FEEs) often uses static images that do not capture the dynamic character of social coordination in natural settings. Recent behavioral and neuroimaging studies suggest that dynamic FEEs (videos or morphs) enhance emotion perception. To identify mechanisms associated with the perception of FEEs with natural dynamics, the present EEG (Electroencephalography)study compared (i) ecologically valid stimuli of angry and happy FEEs with natural dynamics to (ii) FEEs with unnatural dynamics, and to (iii) static FEEs. FEEs with unnatural dynamics showed faces moving in a biologically possible but unpredictable and atypical manner, generally resulting in ambivalent emotional content. Participants were asked to explicitly recognize FEEs. Using whole power (WP) and phase synchrony (Phase Locking Index, PLI), we found that brain responses discriminated between natural and unnatural FEEs (both static and dynamic). Differences were primarily observed in the timing and brain topographies of delta and theta PLI and WP, and in alpha and beta WP. Our results support the view that biologically plausible, albeit atypical, FEEs are processed by the brain by different mechanisms than natural FEEs. We conclude that natural movement dynamics are essential for the perception of FEEs and the associated brain processes.",
author = "Dionysios Perdikis and Jakob Volhard and Viktor M{\"u}ller and Kathrin Kaulard and Brick, {Timothy R.} and Christian Wallraven and Ulman Lindenberger",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0181225",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "e0181225",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Brain synchronization during perception of facial emotional expressions with natural and unnatural dynamics

AU - Perdikis, Dionysios

AU - Volhard, Jakob

AU - Müller, Viktor

AU - Kaulard, Kathrin

AU - Brick, Timothy R.

AU - Wallraven, Christian

AU - Lindenberger, Ulman

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Research on the perception of facial emotional expressions (FEEs) often uses static images that do not capture the dynamic character of social coordination in natural settings. Recent behavioral and neuroimaging studies suggest that dynamic FEEs (videos or morphs) enhance emotion perception. To identify mechanisms associated with the perception of FEEs with natural dynamics, the present EEG (Electroencephalography)study compared (i) ecologically valid stimuli of angry and happy FEEs with natural dynamics to (ii) FEEs with unnatural dynamics, and to (iii) static FEEs. FEEs with unnatural dynamics showed faces moving in a biologically possible but unpredictable and atypical manner, generally resulting in ambivalent emotional content. Participants were asked to explicitly recognize FEEs. Using whole power (WP) and phase synchrony (Phase Locking Index, PLI), we found that brain responses discriminated between natural and unnatural FEEs (both static and dynamic). Differences were primarily observed in the timing and brain topographies of delta and theta PLI and WP, and in alpha and beta WP. Our results support the view that biologically plausible, albeit atypical, FEEs are processed by the brain by different mechanisms than natural FEEs. We conclude that natural movement dynamics are essential for the perception of FEEs and the associated brain processes.

AB - Research on the perception of facial emotional expressions (FEEs) often uses static images that do not capture the dynamic character of social coordination in natural settings. Recent behavioral and neuroimaging studies suggest that dynamic FEEs (videos or morphs) enhance emotion perception. To identify mechanisms associated with the perception of FEEs with natural dynamics, the present EEG (Electroencephalography)study compared (i) ecologically valid stimuli of angry and happy FEEs with natural dynamics to (ii) FEEs with unnatural dynamics, and to (iii) static FEEs. FEEs with unnatural dynamics showed faces moving in a biologically possible but unpredictable and atypical manner, generally resulting in ambivalent emotional content. Participants were asked to explicitly recognize FEEs. Using whole power (WP) and phase synchrony (Phase Locking Index, PLI), we found that brain responses discriminated between natural and unnatural FEEs (both static and dynamic). Differences were primarily observed in the timing and brain topographies of delta and theta PLI and WP, and in alpha and beta WP. Our results support the view that biologically plausible, albeit atypical, FEEs are processed by the brain by different mechanisms than natural FEEs. We conclude that natural movement dynamics are essential for the perception of FEEs and the associated brain processes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030425595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030425595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0181225

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0181225

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - e0181225

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 7

ER -