Can satellite-based data substitute for surveyed data to predict the spatial probability of forest fire? A geostatistical approach to forest fire in the Republic of Korea

Chul Hee Lim, You Seung Kim, Myungsoo Won, Sea Jin Kim, Woo-Kyun Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

To assess which data type is more effective for spatial modeling in the Republic of Korea, we conducted geostatistical analysis based on frequency, intensity, and spatial autocorrelation using two types of forest fire occurrence data: that collected through field survey of the Korea Forest Service (KFS) and satellite active fire data of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). The maximum entropy (MaxEnt) model was used with environmental factors in the spatial modeling of fire probability to compare the accuracy of the two data types based on 10 years of historical data. The results showed a clear difference in fire frequency and similar fire intensity patterns. The spatial autocorrelation between the fire frequency and intensity of the two data types was analyzed using a semi-variogram. Fire intensity was significantly correlated, with the MODIS data having a higher correlation than the KFS data. Examination of the spatial autocorrelation and related factors by fire source also indicated that MODIS data had higher spatial autocorrelation, with remarkable distinction found in climate factors. In spatial the modeling, MODIS data showed a similar outcome to that of hotspot analysis, with higher accuracy and better model performance attributable to high spatial autocorrelation. Even though the KFS data were collected from post-fire surveys, they resulted in low spatial autocorrelation and reduced model accuracy owing to the wide distribution of data. MODIS had many detection errors. With spatial filtering, however, the model accuracy can be improved with relatively high spatial autocorrelation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)719-739
Number of pages21
JournalGeomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Jan 1

Fingerprint

forest fire
autocorrelation
MODIS
modeling
variogram
field survey
entropy
environmental factor

Keywords

  • Forest fire
  • geostatistical analysis
  • KFS fire survey data
  • MODIS active fire data
  • spatial autocorrelation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Cite this

Can satellite-based data substitute for surveyed data to predict the spatial probability of forest fire? A geostatistical approach to forest fire in the Republic of Korea. / Lim, Chul Hee; Kim, You Seung; Won, Myungsoo; Kim, Sea Jin; Lee, Woo-Kyun.

In: Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, Vol. 10, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 719-739.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bd39f8dcd31d4bf9a5961f2b0433f76e,
title = "Can satellite-based data substitute for surveyed data to predict the spatial probability of forest fire? A geostatistical approach to forest fire in the Republic of Korea",
abstract = "To assess which data type is more effective for spatial modeling in the Republic of Korea, we conducted geostatistical analysis based on frequency, intensity, and spatial autocorrelation using two types of forest fire occurrence data: that collected through field survey of the Korea Forest Service (KFS) and satellite active fire data of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). The maximum entropy (MaxEnt) model was used with environmental factors in the spatial modeling of fire probability to compare the accuracy of the two data types based on 10 years of historical data. The results showed a clear difference in fire frequency and similar fire intensity patterns. The spatial autocorrelation between the fire frequency and intensity of the two data types was analyzed using a semi-variogram. Fire intensity was significantly correlated, with the MODIS data having a higher correlation than the KFS data. Examination of the spatial autocorrelation and related factors by fire source also indicated that MODIS data had higher spatial autocorrelation, with remarkable distinction found in climate factors. In spatial the modeling, MODIS data showed a similar outcome to that of hotspot analysis, with higher accuracy and better model performance attributable to high spatial autocorrelation. Even though the KFS data were collected from post-fire surveys, they resulted in low spatial autocorrelation and reduced model accuracy owing to the wide distribution of data. MODIS had many detection errors. With spatial filtering, however, the model accuracy can be improved with relatively high spatial autocorrelation.",
keywords = "Forest fire, geostatistical analysis, KFS fire survey data, MODIS active fire data, spatial autocorrelation",
author = "Lim, {Chul Hee} and Kim, {You Seung} and Myungsoo Won and Kim, {Sea Jin} and Woo-Kyun Lee",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/19475705.2018.1543210",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "719--739",
journal = "Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk",
issn = "1947-5705",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can satellite-based data substitute for surveyed data to predict the spatial probability of forest fire? A geostatistical approach to forest fire in the Republic of Korea

AU - Lim, Chul Hee

AU - Kim, You Seung

AU - Won, Myungsoo

AU - Kim, Sea Jin

AU - Lee, Woo-Kyun

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - To assess which data type is more effective for spatial modeling in the Republic of Korea, we conducted geostatistical analysis based on frequency, intensity, and spatial autocorrelation using two types of forest fire occurrence data: that collected through field survey of the Korea Forest Service (KFS) and satellite active fire data of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). The maximum entropy (MaxEnt) model was used with environmental factors in the spatial modeling of fire probability to compare the accuracy of the two data types based on 10 years of historical data. The results showed a clear difference in fire frequency and similar fire intensity patterns. The spatial autocorrelation between the fire frequency and intensity of the two data types was analyzed using a semi-variogram. Fire intensity was significantly correlated, with the MODIS data having a higher correlation than the KFS data. Examination of the spatial autocorrelation and related factors by fire source also indicated that MODIS data had higher spatial autocorrelation, with remarkable distinction found in climate factors. In spatial the modeling, MODIS data showed a similar outcome to that of hotspot analysis, with higher accuracy and better model performance attributable to high spatial autocorrelation. Even though the KFS data were collected from post-fire surveys, they resulted in low spatial autocorrelation and reduced model accuracy owing to the wide distribution of data. MODIS had many detection errors. With spatial filtering, however, the model accuracy can be improved with relatively high spatial autocorrelation.

AB - To assess which data type is more effective for spatial modeling in the Republic of Korea, we conducted geostatistical analysis based on frequency, intensity, and spatial autocorrelation using two types of forest fire occurrence data: that collected through field survey of the Korea Forest Service (KFS) and satellite active fire data of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). The maximum entropy (MaxEnt) model was used with environmental factors in the spatial modeling of fire probability to compare the accuracy of the two data types based on 10 years of historical data. The results showed a clear difference in fire frequency and similar fire intensity patterns. The spatial autocorrelation between the fire frequency and intensity of the two data types was analyzed using a semi-variogram. Fire intensity was significantly correlated, with the MODIS data having a higher correlation than the KFS data. Examination of the spatial autocorrelation and related factors by fire source also indicated that MODIS data had higher spatial autocorrelation, with remarkable distinction found in climate factors. In spatial the modeling, MODIS data showed a similar outcome to that of hotspot analysis, with higher accuracy and better model performance attributable to high spatial autocorrelation. Even though the KFS data were collected from post-fire surveys, they resulted in low spatial autocorrelation and reduced model accuracy owing to the wide distribution of data. MODIS had many detection errors. With spatial filtering, however, the model accuracy can be improved with relatively high spatial autocorrelation.

KW - Forest fire

KW - geostatistical analysis

KW - KFS fire survey data

KW - MODIS active fire data

KW - spatial autocorrelation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066317757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066317757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19475705.2018.1543210

DO - 10.1080/19475705.2018.1543210

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 719

EP - 739

JO - Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk

JF - Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk

SN - 1947-5705

IS - 1

ER -