Cellulase recycling in high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated empty fruit bunches

Jae Kyun Kim, Jungwoo Yang, So Young Park, Ju Hyun Yu, Kyoung Heon Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks such as empty fruit bunches (EFBs) prove to be potential renewable resources owing to their abundance, low prices, and high carbohydrate contents. Generally, the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into chemicals, fuels, and materials mainly includes pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, fermentation, and recovery of final products. To increase the economic viability of such processes, the cost of cellulase production and enzymatic hydrolysis should be reduced. For this, recycling cellulase can be considered for reducing the saccharification cost of lignocellulose. In this study, cellulase recycling for high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis (i.e., 20%) was evaluated in saccharification of hydrothermally-pretreated EFBs. Results: High-solids (20%) enzymatic hydrolysis of hydrothermally-pretreated empty fruit bunches with 40 FPU of Cellic CTec3/g glucan was carried out for cellulase recycling. In the second round of hydrolysis using a recycled enzyme, only 19.3% of glucose yield was obtained. The most important limiting factors for cellulase recycling of this study were identified as the enzyme inhibition by glucose, the loss of enzyme activities, and the non-productive binding of enzymes to insoluble biomass solids. To overcome these limitations, PEG was added prior to the first-round hydrolysis to reduce non-productive enzyme binding, glucose was removed from the enzyme fraction to be reused in the second-round hydrolysis, and EFB solids from the first-round hydrolysis were used in the second-round hydrolysis. These three additional measures with cellulase recycling resulted in a 3.5 times higher glucose yield (i.e., 68.0%) at the second round than that of the control, the second-round hydrolysis with cellulase recycling but without these measures. Conclusions: Because of the high obstacles found in this study in achieving high saccharification yields in the high-solids saccharification of high-lignin lignocellulose with cellulase recycling, effective measures for improving enzymatic saccharification yields need to be accompanied with cellulase recycling.

Original languageEnglish
Article number138
JournalBiotechnology for Biofuels
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Jun 6

Fingerprint

Enzymatic hydrolysis
Cellulase
Recycling
Fruits
hydrolysis
Fruit
Hydrolysis
Saccharification
recycling
fruit
Glucose
Enzymes
enzyme
glucose
Biomass
Enzyme inhibition
biomass
Enzyme activity
Carbohydrates
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Cellulase recycling
  • Empty fruit bunches
  • Enzymatic hydrolysis
  • High-solids loading
  • Hydrothermal pretreatment
  • Lignocellulose

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biotechnology
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Energy(all)
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Cellulase recycling in high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated empty fruit bunches. / Kim, Jae Kyun; Yang, Jungwoo; Park, So Young; Yu, Ju Hyun; Kim, Kyoung Heon.

In: Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 12, No. 1, 138, 06.06.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, Jae Kyun ; Yang, Jungwoo ; Park, So Young ; Yu, Ju Hyun ; Kim, Kyoung Heon. / Cellulase recycling in high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated empty fruit bunches. In: Biotechnology for Biofuels. 2019 ; Vol. 12, No. 1.
@article{e6da6b15885b459184c7797c023f13e7,
title = "Cellulase recycling in high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated empty fruit bunches",
abstract = "Background: The lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks such as empty fruit bunches (EFBs) prove to be potential renewable resources owing to their abundance, low prices, and high carbohydrate contents. Generally, the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into chemicals, fuels, and materials mainly includes pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, fermentation, and recovery of final products. To increase the economic viability of such processes, the cost of cellulase production and enzymatic hydrolysis should be reduced. For this, recycling cellulase can be considered for reducing the saccharification cost of lignocellulose. In this study, cellulase recycling for high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis (i.e., 20{\%}) was evaluated in saccharification of hydrothermally-pretreated EFBs. Results: High-solids (20{\%}) enzymatic hydrolysis of hydrothermally-pretreated empty fruit bunches with 40 FPU of Cellic CTec3/g glucan was carried out for cellulase recycling. In the second round of hydrolysis using a recycled enzyme, only 19.3{\%} of glucose yield was obtained. The most important limiting factors for cellulase recycling of this study were identified as the enzyme inhibition by glucose, the loss of enzyme activities, and the non-productive binding of enzymes to insoluble biomass solids. To overcome these limitations, PEG was added prior to the first-round hydrolysis to reduce non-productive enzyme binding, glucose was removed from the enzyme fraction to be reused in the second-round hydrolysis, and EFB solids from the first-round hydrolysis were used in the second-round hydrolysis. These three additional measures with cellulase recycling resulted in a 3.5 times higher glucose yield (i.e., 68.0{\%}) at the second round than that of the control, the second-round hydrolysis with cellulase recycling but without these measures. Conclusions: Because of the high obstacles found in this study in achieving high saccharification yields in the high-solids saccharification of high-lignin lignocellulose with cellulase recycling, effective measures for improving enzymatic saccharification yields need to be accompanied with cellulase recycling.",
keywords = "Cellulase recycling, Empty fruit bunches, Enzymatic hydrolysis, High-solids loading, Hydrothermal pretreatment, Lignocellulose",
author = "Kim, {Jae Kyun} and Jungwoo Yang and Park, {So Young} and Yu, {Ju Hyun} and Kim, {Kyoung Heon}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1186/s13068-019-1476-x",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Biotechnology for Biofuels",
issn = "1754-6834",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cellulase recycling in high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated empty fruit bunches

AU - Kim, Jae Kyun

AU - Yang, Jungwoo

AU - Park, So Young

AU - Yu, Ju Hyun

AU - Kim, Kyoung Heon

PY - 2019/6/6

Y1 - 2019/6/6

N2 - Background: The lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks such as empty fruit bunches (EFBs) prove to be potential renewable resources owing to their abundance, low prices, and high carbohydrate contents. Generally, the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into chemicals, fuels, and materials mainly includes pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, fermentation, and recovery of final products. To increase the economic viability of such processes, the cost of cellulase production and enzymatic hydrolysis should be reduced. For this, recycling cellulase can be considered for reducing the saccharification cost of lignocellulose. In this study, cellulase recycling for high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis (i.e., 20%) was evaluated in saccharification of hydrothermally-pretreated EFBs. Results: High-solids (20%) enzymatic hydrolysis of hydrothermally-pretreated empty fruit bunches with 40 FPU of Cellic CTec3/g glucan was carried out for cellulase recycling. In the second round of hydrolysis using a recycled enzyme, only 19.3% of glucose yield was obtained. The most important limiting factors for cellulase recycling of this study were identified as the enzyme inhibition by glucose, the loss of enzyme activities, and the non-productive binding of enzymes to insoluble biomass solids. To overcome these limitations, PEG was added prior to the first-round hydrolysis to reduce non-productive enzyme binding, glucose was removed from the enzyme fraction to be reused in the second-round hydrolysis, and EFB solids from the first-round hydrolysis were used in the second-round hydrolysis. These three additional measures with cellulase recycling resulted in a 3.5 times higher glucose yield (i.e., 68.0%) at the second round than that of the control, the second-round hydrolysis with cellulase recycling but without these measures. Conclusions: Because of the high obstacles found in this study in achieving high saccharification yields in the high-solids saccharification of high-lignin lignocellulose with cellulase recycling, effective measures for improving enzymatic saccharification yields need to be accompanied with cellulase recycling.

AB - Background: The lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks such as empty fruit bunches (EFBs) prove to be potential renewable resources owing to their abundance, low prices, and high carbohydrate contents. Generally, the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into chemicals, fuels, and materials mainly includes pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, fermentation, and recovery of final products. To increase the economic viability of such processes, the cost of cellulase production and enzymatic hydrolysis should be reduced. For this, recycling cellulase can be considered for reducing the saccharification cost of lignocellulose. In this study, cellulase recycling for high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis (i.e., 20%) was evaluated in saccharification of hydrothermally-pretreated EFBs. Results: High-solids (20%) enzymatic hydrolysis of hydrothermally-pretreated empty fruit bunches with 40 FPU of Cellic CTec3/g glucan was carried out for cellulase recycling. In the second round of hydrolysis using a recycled enzyme, only 19.3% of glucose yield was obtained. The most important limiting factors for cellulase recycling of this study were identified as the enzyme inhibition by glucose, the loss of enzyme activities, and the non-productive binding of enzymes to insoluble biomass solids. To overcome these limitations, PEG was added prior to the first-round hydrolysis to reduce non-productive enzyme binding, glucose was removed from the enzyme fraction to be reused in the second-round hydrolysis, and EFB solids from the first-round hydrolysis were used in the second-round hydrolysis. These three additional measures with cellulase recycling resulted in a 3.5 times higher glucose yield (i.e., 68.0%) at the second round than that of the control, the second-round hydrolysis with cellulase recycling but without these measures. Conclusions: Because of the high obstacles found in this study in achieving high saccharification yields in the high-solids saccharification of high-lignin lignocellulose with cellulase recycling, effective measures for improving enzymatic saccharification yields need to be accompanied with cellulase recycling.

KW - Cellulase recycling

KW - Empty fruit bunches

KW - Enzymatic hydrolysis

KW - High-solids loading

KW - Hydrothermal pretreatment

KW - Lignocellulose

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067125662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067125662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13068-019-1476-x

DO - 10.1186/s13068-019-1476-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85067125662

VL - 12

JO - Biotechnology for Biofuels

JF - Biotechnology for Biofuels

SN - 1754-6834

IS - 1

M1 - 138

ER -