Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics at the lumbosacral level in patients with spinal stenosis: A pilot study

Se Woong Chun, Hack Jin Lee, Koong Ho Nam, Chul Ho Sohn, Kwang Dong Kim, Eun Jin Jeong, Sun G. Chung, Keewon Kim, Dong Ju Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Spinal stenosis is a common degenerative condition. However, how neurogenic claudication develops has not been clearly elucidated. Moreover, cerebrospinal fluid physiology at the lumbosacral level has not received adequate attention. This study was conducted to compare cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics at the lumbosacral spinal level between patients with spinal stenosis and healthy controls. Twelve subjects (four patients and eight healthy controls; 25-77 years old; seven males) underwent phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging to quantify cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. The cerebrospinal fluid flow velocities were measured at the L2 and S1 levels. All subjects were evaluated at rest and after walking (to provoke neurogenic claudication in the patients). The caudal peak flow velocity in the sacral spine (-0.25±0.28cm/s) was attenuated compared to that in the lumbar spine (-0.93±0.46cm/s) in both patients and controls. The lumbar caudal peak flow velocity was slower in patients (-0.65±0.22cm/s) than controls (-1.07±0.49cm/s) and this difference became more pronounced after walking (-0.66±0.37cm/s in patients, -1.35±0.52cm/s in controls; p=0.028). The sacral cerebrospinal fluid flow after walking was barely detectable in patients (caudal peak flow velocity: -0.09±0.03cm/s). Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in the lumbosacral spine were more attenuated in patients with spinal stenosis than healthy controls. After walking, the patients experiencing claudication did not exhibit an increase in the cerebrospinal fluid flow rate as the controls did. Altered cerebrospinal fluid dynamics may partially explain the pathophysiology of spinal stenosis.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Research
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2016

Fingerprint

Spinal Stenosis
Hydrodynamics
Cerebrospinal Fluid
Walking
Spine
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Keywords

  • Cerebrospinal fluid
  • Hydrodynamics
  • Lumbar spinal stenosis
  • Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics at the lumbosacral level in patients with spinal stenosis : A pilot study. / Chun, Se Woong; Lee, Hack Jin; Nam, Koong Ho; Sohn, Chul Ho; Kim, Kwang Dong; Jeong, Eun Jin; Chung, Sun G.; Kim, Keewon; Kim, Dong Ju.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chun, Se Woong ; Lee, Hack Jin ; Nam, Koong Ho ; Sohn, Chul Ho ; Kim, Kwang Dong ; Jeong, Eun Jin ; Chung, Sun G. ; Kim, Keewon ; Kim, Dong Ju. / Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics at the lumbosacral level in patients with spinal stenosis : A pilot study. In: Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2016.
@article{fa1010a0389245cebdad3ddf1595a32a,
title = "Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics at the lumbosacral level in patients with spinal stenosis: A pilot study",
abstract = "Spinal stenosis is a common degenerative condition. However, how neurogenic claudication develops has not been clearly elucidated. Moreover, cerebrospinal fluid physiology at the lumbosacral level has not received adequate attention. This study was conducted to compare cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics at the lumbosacral spinal level between patients with spinal stenosis and healthy controls. Twelve subjects (four patients and eight healthy controls; 25-77 years old; seven males) underwent phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging to quantify cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. The cerebrospinal fluid flow velocities were measured at the L2 and S1 levels. All subjects were evaluated at rest and after walking (to provoke neurogenic claudication in the patients). The caudal peak flow velocity in the sacral spine (-0.25±0.28cm/s) was attenuated compared to that in the lumbar spine (-0.93±0.46cm/s) in both patients and controls. The lumbar caudal peak flow velocity was slower in patients (-0.65±0.22cm/s) than controls (-1.07±0.49cm/s) and this difference became more pronounced after walking (-0.66±0.37cm/s in patients, -1.35±0.52cm/s in controls; p=0.028). The sacral cerebrospinal fluid flow after walking was barely detectable in patients (caudal peak flow velocity: -0.09±0.03cm/s). Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in the lumbosacral spine were more attenuated in patients with spinal stenosis than healthy controls. After walking, the patients experiencing claudication did not exhibit an increase in the cerebrospinal fluid flow rate as the controls did. Altered cerebrospinal fluid dynamics may partially explain the pathophysiology of spinal stenosis.",
keywords = "Cerebrospinal fluid, Hydrodynamics, Lumbar spinal stenosis, Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging",
author = "Chun, {Se Woong} and Lee, {Hack Jin} and Nam, {Koong Ho} and Sohn, {Chul Ho} and Kim, {Kwang Dong} and Jeong, {Eun Jin} and Chung, {Sun G.} and Keewon Kim and Kim, {Dong Ju}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1002/jor.23448",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Research",
issn = "0736-0266",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics at the lumbosacral level in patients with spinal stenosis

T2 - A pilot study

AU - Chun, Se Woong

AU - Lee, Hack Jin

AU - Nam, Koong Ho

AU - Sohn, Chul Ho

AU - Kim, Kwang Dong

AU - Jeong, Eun Jin

AU - Chung, Sun G.

AU - Kim, Keewon

AU - Kim, Dong Ju

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Spinal stenosis is a common degenerative condition. However, how neurogenic claudication develops has not been clearly elucidated. Moreover, cerebrospinal fluid physiology at the lumbosacral level has not received adequate attention. This study was conducted to compare cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics at the lumbosacral spinal level between patients with spinal stenosis and healthy controls. Twelve subjects (four patients and eight healthy controls; 25-77 years old; seven males) underwent phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging to quantify cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. The cerebrospinal fluid flow velocities were measured at the L2 and S1 levels. All subjects were evaluated at rest and after walking (to provoke neurogenic claudication in the patients). The caudal peak flow velocity in the sacral spine (-0.25±0.28cm/s) was attenuated compared to that in the lumbar spine (-0.93±0.46cm/s) in both patients and controls. The lumbar caudal peak flow velocity was slower in patients (-0.65±0.22cm/s) than controls (-1.07±0.49cm/s) and this difference became more pronounced after walking (-0.66±0.37cm/s in patients, -1.35±0.52cm/s in controls; p=0.028). The sacral cerebrospinal fluid flow after walking was barely detectable in patients (caudal peak flow velocity: -0.09±0.03cm/s). Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in the lumbosacral spine were more attenuated in patients with spinal stenosis than healthy controls. After walking, the patients experiencing claudication did not exhibit an increase in the cerebrospinal fluid flow rate as the controls did. Altered cerebrospinal fluid dynamics may partially explain the pathophysiology of spinal stenosis.

AB - Spinal stenosis is a common degenerative condition. However, how neurogenic claudication develops has not been clearly elucidated. Moreover, cerebrospinal fluid physiology at the lumbosacral level has not received adequate attention. This study was conducted to compare cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics at the lumbosacral spinal level between patients with spinal stenosis and healthy controls. Twelve subjects (four patients and eight healthy controls; 25-77 years old; seven males) underwent phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging to quantify cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. The cerebrospinal fluid flow velocities were measured at the L2 and S1 levels. All subjects were evaluated at rest and after walking (to provoke neurogenic claudication in the patients). The caudal peak flow velocity in the sacral spine (-0.25±0.28cm/s) was attenuated compared to that in the lumbar spine (-0.93±0.46cm/s) in both patients and controls. The lumbar caudal peak flow velocity was slower in patients (-0.65±0.22cm/s) than controls (-1.07±0.49cm/s) and this difference became more pronounced after walking (-0.66±0.37cm/s in patients, -1.35±0.52cm/s in controls; p=0.028). The sacral cerebrospinal fluid flow after walking was barely detectable in patients (caudal peak flow velocity: -0.09±0.03cm/s). Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in the lumbosacral spine were more attenuated in patients with spinal stenosis than healthy controls. After walking, the patients experiencing claudication did not exhibit an increase in the cerebrospinal fluid flow rate as the controls did. Altered cerebrospinal fluid dynamics may partially explain the pathophysiology of spinal stenosis.

KW - Cerebrospinal fluid

KW - Hydrodynamics

KW - Lumbar spinal stenosis

KW - Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84996565331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84996565331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jor.23448

DO - 10.1002/jor.23448

M3 - Article

C2 - 27664416

AN - SCOPUS:84996565331

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Research

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Research

SN - 0736-0266

ER -