Charactersitics and issues of guideline to withdrawal of a life-sustaining therapy

Younsuck Koh, Dae Seog Heo, Young Ho Yun, Jeong Lim Moon, Hyoung Wook Park, Ji-Tae Choung, Hyo Sung Jung, Bark Jang Byun, Yoon Seong Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Agenerally accepted consensus of end-of-life (EOL) care decision-making did not appear in Korean medical society until the year 2009. To enhance physician's ethical perception of EOL care, consensus guidelines to withdrawing life-sustaining therapies endorsed by Korean Medical Association, Korean Academy of Medical Science, and Korean Hospital Association, were published on October 13, 2009. In this article, the characteristics and issues with the guidelines are presented to improve understanding by physicians who interact with EOL patients. According to the guidelines, physicians should identify, document, respect, and act on hospitals inpatients' needs, priorities, and preferences for EOL care. The guidelines advocate that competent patients express their right of self-determination in EOL care decisions through advance directives. However, there are barriers to adopting advance directives as a legitimate tool of EOL decision-making in our current society. The guidelines stressed the importance of open communication between care-givers and patients or their surrogates. Through communication, physicians can create a plan regarding how to manage EOL until the patients' last day of life. Concerted actions among the general public, professionals, other stake-holders for EOL care, and governmental organizations to improve EOL care in our society are also stipulated. Physicians, who know the clinical meaning of the treatments available to EOL patients, should play a central role based on the consensus guidelines to help patients and their families make informed decisions about EOL care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)747-757
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the Korean Medical Association
Volume54
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Jul 1

Fingerprint

Terminal Care
Guidelines
Physicians
Advance Directives
Consensus
Therapeutics
Decision Making
Communication
Personal Autonomy
Medical Societies
Caregivers
Inpatients
Organizations

Keywords

  • Autonomy
  • Consensus guideline
  • End-of-life care
  • System

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Charactersitics and issues of guideline to withdrawal of a life-sustaining therapy. / Koh, Younsuck; Heo, Dae Seog; Yun, Young Ho; Moon, Jeong Lim; Park, Hyoung Wook; Choung, Ji-Tae; Jung, Hyo Sung; Byun, Bark Jang; Lee, Yoon Seong.

In: Journal of the Korean Medical Association, Vol. 54, No. 7, 01.07.2011, p. 747-757.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Koh, Younsuck ; Heo, Dae Seog ; Yun, Young Ho ; Moon, Jeong Lim ; Park, Hyoung Wook ; Choung, Ji-Tae ; Jung, Hyo Sung ; Byun, Bark Jang ; Lee, Yoon Seong. / Charactersitics and issues of guideline to withdrawal of a life-sustaining therapy. In: Journal of the Korean Medical Association. 2011 ; Vol. 54, No. 7. pp. 747-757.
@article{9343ec67ff654f998bc58f8db6d0383c,
title = "Charactersitics and issues of guideline to withdrawal of a life-sustaining therapy",
abstract = "Agenerally accepted consensus of end-of-life (EOL) care decision-making did not appear in Korean medical society until the year 2009. To enhance physician's ethical perception of EOL care, consensus guidelines to withdrawing life-sustaining therapies endorsed by Korean Medical Association, Korean Academy of Medical Science, and Korean Hospital Association, were published on October 13, 2009. In this article, the characteristics and issues with the guidelines are presented to improve understanding by physicians who interact with EOL patients. According to the guidelines, physicians should identify, document, respect, and act on hospitals inpatients' needs, priorities, and preferences for EOL care. The guidelines advocate that competent patients express their right of self-determination in EOL care decisions through advance directives. However, there are barriers to adopting advance directives as a legitimate tool of EOL decision-making in our current society. The guidelines stressed the importance of open communication between care-givers and patients or their surrogates. Through communication, physicians can create a plan regarding how to manage EOL until the patients' last day of life. Concerted actions among the general public, professionals, other stake-holders for EOL care, and governmental organizations to improve EOL care in our society are also stipulated. Physicians, who know the clinical meaning of the treatments available to EOL patients, should play a central role based on the consensus guidelines to help patients and their families make informed decisions about EOL care.",
keywords = "Autonomy, Consensus guideline, End-of-life care, System",
author = "Younsuck Koh and Heo, {Dae Seog} and Yun, {Young Ho} and Moon, {Jeong Lim} and Park, {Hyoung Wook} and Ji-Tae Choung and Jung, {Hyo Sung} and Byun, {Bark Jang} and Lee, {Yoon Seong}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5124/jkma.2011.54.7.747",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "747--757",
journal = "Journal of the Korean Medical Association",
issn = "1975-8456",
publisher = "Korean Medical Association",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Charactersitics and issues of guideline to withdrawal of a life-sustaining therapy

AU - Koh, Younsuck

AU - Heo, Dae Seog

AU - Yun, Young Ho

AU - Moon, Jeong Lim

AU - Park, Hyoung Wook

AU - Choung, Ji-Tae

AU - Jung, Hyo Sung

AU - Byun, Bark Jang

AU - Lee, Yoon Seong

PY - 2011/7/1

Y1 - 2011/7/1

N2 - Agenerally accepted consensus of end-of-life (EOL) care decision-making did not appear in Korean medical society until the year 2009. To enhance physician's ethical perception of EOL care, consensus guidelines to withdrawing life-sustaining therapies endorsed by Korean Medical Association, Korean Academy of Medical Science, and Korean Hospital Association, were published on October 13, 2009. In this article, the characteristics and issues with the guidelines are presented to improve understanding by physicians who interact with EOL patients. According to the guidelines, physicians should identify, document, respect, and act on hospitals inpatients' needs, priorities, and preferences for EOL care. The guidelines advocate that competent patients express their right of self-determination in EOL care decisions through advance directives. However, there are barriers to adopting advance directives as a legitimate tool of EOL decision-making in our current society. The guidelines stressed the importance of open communication between care-givers and patients or their surrogates. Through communication, physicians can create a plan regarding how to manage EOL until the patients' last day of life. Concerted actions among the general public, professionals, other stake-holders for EOL care, and governmental organizations to improve EOL care in our society are also stipulated. Physicians, who know the clinical meaning of the treatments available to EOL patients, should play a central role based on the consensus guidelines to help patients and their families make informed decisions about EOL care.

AB - Agenerally accepted consensus of end-of-life (EOL) care decision-making did not appear in Korean medical society until the year 2009. To enhance physician's ethical perception of EOL care, consensus guidelines to withdrawing life-sustaining therapies endorsed by Korean Medical Association, Korean Academy of Medical Science, and Korean Hospital Association, were published on October 13, 2009. In this article, the characteristics and issues with the guidelines are presented to improve understanding by physicians who interact with EOL patients. According to the guidelines, physicians should identify, document, respect, and act on hospitals inpatients' needs, priorities, and preferences for EOL care. The guidelines advocate that competent patients express their right of self-determination in EOL care decisions through advance directives. However, there are barriers to adopting advance directives as a legitimate tool of EOL decision-making in our current society. The guidelines stressed the importance of open communication between care-givers and patients or their surrogates. Through communication, physicians can create a plan regarding how to manage EOL until the patients' last day of life. Concerted actions among the general public, professionals, other stake-holders for EOL care, and governmental organizations to improve EOL care in our society are also stipulated. Physicians, who know the clinical meaning of the treatments available to EOL patients, should play a central role based on the consensus guidelines to help patients and their families make informed decisions about EOL care.

KW - Autonomy

KW - Consensus guideline

KW - End-of-life care

KW - System

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960768856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960768856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5124/jkma.2011.54.7.747

DO - 10.5124/jkma.2011.54.7.747

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79960768856

VL - 54

SP - 747

EP - 757

JO - Journal of the Korean Medical Association

JF - Journal of the Korean Medical Association

SN - 1975-8456

IS - 7

ER -