Class exploitation and psychiatric disorders

From status syndrome to capitalist syndrome

Carles Muntaner, Carme Borrell, Haejoo Chung

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Psychiatric epidemiologists were among the first scientists to document that the poor suffer from a higher rate of psychiatric disorders than the affluent. Psychiatric disorders and, more precisely, psychiatric research have propelled many studies on social class and psychiatricdisorders which reflect the humanistic concerns of psychiatrists. These studies were motivated by a desire to improve the living conditions of workers, immigrants, and racial or ethnic minorities (e.g., Blazer et al., 1994; Eaton et al,2004; Jacobi et al., 2004; Lahelma et al., 2005; Regier et al.,1988; Roberts & Lee, 1993).The absence or poor quality of psychiatric careforpoor working class, immigrant, or racial and ethnic minority populations (Muntaner et al.,1995a;Alegria et al., 2000; Cohen et al., 2006) raised a related set of concerns about the implications of economic inequality for the treatment of psychiatric disorders.The psychiatric and public health perspective on social class has been characteristically “pragmatic” (e.g., Asthana et al., 2004). Following the ethos of public health and medical care, the goal has been to“act upon the world” to reduce suffering and increase well-being (Navarro &Muntaner, 2004).Psychiatric disorders, which have a major worldwide impact on disability, arethe leading cause of disability among women and, by 2020, are expected to become the main cause of years lost to disability (Murray & Lopez, 1996).

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLiberatory Psychiatry: Philosophy, Politics, and Mental Health
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages131-146
Number of pages16
ISBN (Print)9780511543678, 9780521689816
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychiatry
Social Class
Public Health
Social Conditions
Psychological Stress
Economics
Delivery of Health Care
Research
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Muntaner, C., Borrell, C., & Chung, H. (2008). Class exploitation and psychiatric disorders: From status syndrome to capitalist syndrome. In Liberatory Psychiatry: Philosophy, Politics, and Mental Health (pp. 131-146). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543678.008

Class exploitation and psychiatric disorders : From status syndrome to capitalist syndrome. / Muntaner, Carles; Borrell, Carme; Chung, Haejoo.

Liberatory Psychiatry: Philosophy, Politics, and Mental Health. Cambridge University Press, 2008. p. 131-146.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Muntaner, C, Borrell, C & Chung, H 2008, Class exploitation and psychiatric disorders: From status syndrome to capitalist syndrome. in Liberatory Psychiatry: Philosophy, Politics, and Mental Health. Cambridge University Press, pp. 131-146. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543678.008
Muntaner C, Borrell C, Chung H. Class exploitation and psychiatric disorders: From status syndrome to capitalist syndrome. In Liberatory Psychiatry: Philosophy, Politics, and Mental Health. Cambridge University Press. 2008. p. 131-146 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543678.008
Muntaner, Carles ; Borrell, Carme ; Chung, Haejoo. / Class exploitation and psychiatric disorders : From status syndrome to capitalist syndrome. Liberatory Psychiatry: Philosophy, Politics, and Mental Health. Cambridge University Press, 2008. pp. 131-146
@inbook{d339bb68305647c3a457be9b1a309510,
title = "Class exploitation and psychiatric disorders: From status syndrome to capitalist syndrome",
abstract = "Psychiatric epidemiologists were among the first scientists to document that the poor suffer from a higher rate of psychiatric disorders than the affluent. Psychiatric disorders and, more precisely, psychiatric research have propelled many studies on social class and psychiatricdisorders which reflect the humanistic concerns of psychiatrists. These studies were motivated by a desire to improve the living conditions of workers, immigrants, and racial or ethnic minorities (e.g., Blazer et al., 1994; Eaton et al,2004; Jacobi et al., 2004; Lahelma et al., 2005; Regier et al.,1988; Roberts & Lee, 1993).The absence or poor quality of psychiatric careforpoor working class, immigrant, or racial and ethnic minority populations (Muntaner et al.,1995a;Alegria et al., 2000; Cohen et al., 2006) raised a related set of concerns about the implications of economic inequality for the treatment of psychiatric disorders.The psychiatric and public health perspective on social class has been characteristically “pragmatic” (e.g., Asthana et al., 2004). Following the ethos of public health and medical care, the goal has been to“act upon the world” to reduce suffering and increase well-being (Navarro &Muntaner, 2004).Psychiatric disorders, which have a major worldwide impact on disability, arethe leading cause of disability among women and, by 2020, are expected to become the main cause of years lost to disability (Murray & Lopez, 1996).",
author = "Carles Muntaner and Carme Borrell and Haejoo Chung",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511543678.008",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780511543678",
pages = "131--146",
booktitle = "Liberatory Psychiatry: Philosophy, Politics, and Mental Health",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Class exploitation and psychiatric disorders

T2 - From status syndrome to capitalist syndrome

AU - Muntaner, Carles

AU - Borrell, Carme

AU - Chung, Haejoo

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Psychiatric epidemiologists were among the first scientists to document that the poor suffer from a higher rate of psychiatric disorders than the affluent. Psychiatric disorders and, more precisely, psychiatric research have propelled many studies on social class and psychiatricdisorders which reflect the humanistic concerns of psychiatrists. These studies were motivated by a desire to improve the living conditions of workers, immigrants, and racial or ethnic minorities (e.g., Blazer et al., 1994; Eaton et al,2004; Jacobi et al., 2004; Lahelma et al., 2005; Regier et al.,1988; Roberts & Lee, 1993).The absence or poor quality of psychiatric careforpoor working class, immigrant, or racial and ethnic minority populations (Muntaner et al.,1995a;Alegria et al., 2000; Cohen et al., 2006) raised a related set of concerns about the implications of economic inequality for the treatment of psychiatric disorders.The psychiatric and public health perspective on social class has been characteristically “pragmatic” (e.g., Asthana et al., 2004). Following the ethos of public health and medical care, the goal has been to“act upon the world” to reduce suffering and increase well-being (Navarro &Muntaner, 2004).Psychiatric disorders, which have a major worldwide impact on disability, arethe leading cause of disability among women and, by 2020, are expected to become the main cause of years lost to disability (Murray & Lopez, 1996).

AB - Psychiatric epidemiologists were among the first scientists to document that the poor suffer from a higher rate of psychiatric disorders than the affluent. Psychiatric disorders and, more precisely, psychiatric research have propelled many studies on social class and psychiatricdisorders which reflect the humanistic concerns of psychiatrists. These studies were motivated by a desire to improve the living conditions of workers, immigrants, and racial or ethnic minorities (e.g., Blazer et al., 1994; Eaton et al,2004; Jacobi et al., 2004; Lahelma et al., 2005; Regier et al.,1988; Roberts & Lee, 1993).The absence or poor quality of psychiatric careforpoor working class, immigrant, or racial and ethnic minority populations (Muntaner et al.,1995a;Alegria et al., 2000; Cohen et al., 2006) raised a related set of concerns about the implications of economic inequality for the treatment of psychiatric disorders.The psychiatric and public health perspective on social class has been characteristically “pragmatic” (e.g., Asthana et al., 2004). Following the ethos of public health and medical care, the goal has been to“act upon the world” to reduce suffering and increase well-being (Navarro &Muntaner, 2004).Psychiatric disorders, which have a major worldwide impact on disability, arethe leading cause of disability among women and, by 2020, are expected to become the main cause of years lost to disability (Murray & Lopez, 1996).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954530041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954530041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511543678.008

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511543678.008

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780511543678

SN - 9780521689816

SP - 131

EP - 146

BT - Liberatory Psychiatry: Philosophy, Politics, and Mental Health

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -