Clinical outcomes of initial and repeated nasolacrimal duct office-based probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Deok Sun Cha, Hwa Lee, Min Soo Park, Jong Mi Lee, Se Hyun Baek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To characterize the outcomes of initial and repeated office-based probing as a primary treatment for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) in children. The medical records of patients who underwent nasolacrimal duct office-based probing for CNLDO between March 2004 and January 2008 were reviewed retrospectively. Nasolacrimal duct probing was performed on 244 eyes from 229 consecutive patients with CNLDO. Patients who were refractory to the first probing underwent a second probing 4 to 8 weeks later. Based on exclusion criteria, 244 eyes from 229 patients (117 males and 112 females), aged 6 to 71 months (mean, 12.4 ± 8.36) were included. The success rate of the initial probing was 80% (196 of 244) for all patients, 82% (111 of 136) in the 6 to 12 month age group, 79% (64 of 81) in the 13 to 18 months age group, and 78% (21 of 27) among individuals older than 19 months (p = 0.868, Pearson chi-square test). The success rate of the second probing was 61% (25 of 41) for all patients, 74% (17 of 23) in the 6 to 12 months age group, 58% (7 of 12) in the 13 to 18 months age group, and 17% (1 of 6) among individuals older than 19 months (p = 0.043, Fisher's exact test). While the success rate of initial nasolacrimal duct probing is not affected by age, the rate of success rate with a second probing was significantly lower in patients older than 19 months. Based on the results, authors recommend further surgical interventions, such as silicone tube intubation or balloon dacryocystoplasty, instead of repeated office probing for patients older than 19 months, if an initial office probing has failed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)261-266
Number of pages6
JournalKorean journal of ophthalmology : KJO
Volume24
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Oct 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nasolacrimal Duct
Age Groups
Silicones
Chi-Square Distribution
Intubation
Medical Records

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Clinical outcomes of initial and repeated nasolacrimal duct office-based probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. / Cha, Deok Sun; Lee, Hwa; Park, Min Soo; Lee, Jong Mi; Baek, Se Hyun.

In: Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO, Vol. 24, No. 5, 01.10.2010, p. 261-266.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1e0f3df5d8fe4b89b235c79be17dd4a7,
title = "Clinical outcomes of initial and repeated nasolacrimal duct office-based probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.",
abstract = "To characterize the outcomes of initial and repeated office-based probing as a primary treatment for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) in children. The medical records of patients who underwent nasolacrimal duct office-based probing for CNLDO between March 2004 and January 2008 were reviewed retrospectively. Nasolacrimal duct probing was performed on 244 eyes from 229 consecutive patients with CNLDO. Patients who were refractory to the first probing underwent a second probing 4 to 8 weeks later. Based on exclusion criteria, 244 eyes from 229 patients (117 males and 112 females), aged 6 to 71 months (mean, 12.4 ± 8.36) were included. The success rate of the initial probing was 80{\%} (196 of 244) for all patients, 82{\%} (111 of 136) in the 6 to 12 month age group, 79{\%} (64 of 81) in the 13 to 18 months age group, and 78{\%} (21 of 27) among individuals older than 19 months (p = 0.868, Pearson chi-square test). The success rate of the second probing was 61{\%} (25 of 41) for all patients, 74{\%} (17 of 23) in the 6 to 12 months age group, 58{\%} (7 of 12) in the 13 to 18 months age group, and 17{\%} (1 of 6) among individuals older than 19 months (p = 0.043, Fisher's exact test). While the success rate of initial nasolacrimal duct probing is not affected by age, the rate of success rate with a second probing was significantly lower in patients older than 19 months. Based on the results, authors recommend further surgical interventions, such as silicone tube intubation or balloon dacryocystoplasty, instead of repeated office probing for patients older than 19 months, if an initial office probing has failed.",
author = "Cha, {Deok Sun} and Hwa Lee and Park, {Min Soo} and Lee, {Jong Mi} and Baek, {Se Hyun}",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "261--266",
journal = "Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO",
issn = "1011-8942",
publisher = "Seoul Kjo",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical outcomes of initial and repeated nasolacrimal duct office-based probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

AU - Cha, Deok Sun

AU - Lee, Hwa

AU - Park, Min Soo

AU - Lee, Jong Mi

AU - Baek, Se Hyun

PY - 2010/10/1

Y1 - 2010/10/1

N2 - To characterize the outcomes of initial and repeated office-based probing as a primary treatment for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) in children. The medical records of patients who underwent nasolacrimal duct office-based probing for CNLDO between March 2004 and January 2008 were reviewed retrospectively. Nasolacrimal duct probing was performed on 244 eyes from 229 consecutive patients with CNLDO. Patients who were refractory to the first probing underwent a second probing 4 to 8 weeks later. Based on exclusion criteria, 244 eyes from 229 patients (117 males and 112 females), aged 6 to 71 months (mean, 12.4 ± 8.36) were included. The success rate of the initial probing was 80% (196 of 244) for all patients, 82% (111 of 136) in the 6 to 12 month age group, 79% (64 of 81) in the 13 to 18 months age group, and 78% (21 of 27) among individuals older than 19 months (p = 0.868, Pearson chi-square test). The success rate of the second probing was 61% (25 of 41) for all patients, 74% (17 of 23) in the 6 to 12 months age group, 58% (7 of 12) in the 13 to 18 months age group, and 17% (1 of 6) among individuals older than 19 months (p = 0.043, Fisher's exact test). While the success rate of initial nasolacrimal duct probing is not affected by age, the rate of success rate with a second probing was significantly lower in patients older than 19 months. Based on the results, authors recommend further surgical interventions, such as silicone tube intubation or balloon dacryocystoplasty, instead of repeated office probing for patients older than 19 months, if an initial office probing has failed.

AB - To characterize the outcomes of initial and repeated office-based probing as a primary treatment for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) in children. The medical records of patients who underwent nasolacrimal duct office-based probing for CNLDO between March 2004 and January 2008 were reviewed retrospectively. Nasolacrimal duct probing was performed on 244 eyes from 229 consecutive patients with CNLDO. Patients who were refractory to the first probing underwent a second probing 4 to 8 weeks later. Based on exclusion criteria, 244 eyes from 229 patients (117 males and 112 females), aged 6 to 71 months (mean, 12.4 ± 8.36) were included. The success rate of the initial probing was 80% (196 of 244) for all patients, 82% (111 of 136) in the 6 to 12 month age group, 79% (64 of 81) in the 13 to 18 months age group, and 78% (21 of 27) among individuals older than 19 months (p = 0.868, Pearson chi-square test). The success rate of the second probing was 61% (25 of 41) for all patients, 74% (17 of 23) in the 6 to 12 months age group, 58% (7 of 12) in the 13 to 18 months age group, and 17% (1 of 6) among individuals older than 19 months (p = 0.043, Fisher's exact test). While the success rate of initial nasolacrimal duct probing is not affected by age, the rate of success rate with a second probing was significantly lower in patients older than 19 months. Based on the results, authors recommend further surgical interventions, such as silicone tube intubation or balloon dacryocystoplasty, instead of repeated office probing for patients older than 19 months, if an initial office probing has failed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952998265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952998265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 21052504

AN - SCOPUS:79952998265

VL - 24

SP - 261

EP - 266

JO - Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO

JF - Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO

SN - 1011-8942

IS - 5

ER -