[Clinicopathologic features of cases with negative pathologic results after endoscopic submucosal dissection].

Min Jung Kwon, Jong Jae Park, Jae Won Yun, Hye Jin Noh, Dae Woong Yoon, Won Jin Chang, Ha Young Oh, Baek-Hui Kim, Hyunjoo Lee, Moon Kyung Joo, Beomjae Lee, Ji Hoon Kim, Jong Eun Yeon, Jae Seon Kim, Kwan Soo Byun, Young-Tae Bak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is accepted as a standard treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC) and gastric adenoma. Occasionally, tumorous lesion is not found and pathologic discrepancies can occur after ESD. The aim of this study was to analyze the factors affecting the negative pathologic results after ESD. We retrospectively reviewed the data from all patients with gastric neoplasm (276 EGC and 516 gastric adenomas) who were treated with ESD during past 3 years and enrolled the patients who had negative pathologic results. Out of 792 patients treated with ESD, 27 patients (3.4%) were eligible for inclusion. Among the 27 patients, factors affecting the negative pathologic results were, most commonly, the focal lesion (n=13, 48.2%) which was small enough to be removed completely during pre-ESD biopsy, followed by pathologic discrepancies (n=11, 40.7%) between pathologists and lastly the operator factor (n=3, 11.1%) dissecting incorrect lesions. Of the focal lesions, the initial pathologic diagnoses were adenocarcinoma in 11 cases (84.6%). In cases with pathologic discrepancies, all the pretreatment diagnoses were adenoma with low grade dysplasia. In cases caused by operator factors, intestinal metaplasia was accompanied by elevated adenoma in all cases. To decrease negative pathologic results after ESD, an endoscopist should perform ESD after sufficient communication with pathologists, especially for adenoma with low grade dysplasia, and choose correct lesion, especially located at the antrum and associated with intestinal metaplasia. The possibility of total removal of small lesions even by forcep biopsy should be considered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)211-217
Number of pages7
JournalThe Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi
Volume59
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Mar 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Adenoma
Stomach Neoplasms
Metaplasia
Biopsy
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Surgical Instruments
Statistical Factor Analysis
Adenocarcinoma
Communication
Pathologists
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

[Clinicopathologic features of cases with negative pathologic results after endoscopic submucosal dissection]. / Kwon, Min Jung; Park, Jong Jae; Yun, Jae Won; Noh, Hye Jin; Yoon, Dae Woong; Chang, Won Jin; Oh, Ha Young; Kim, Baek-Hui; Lee, Hyunjoo; Joo, Moon Kyung; Lee, Beomjae; Kim, Ji Hoon; Yeon, Jong Eun; Kim, Jae Seon; Byun, Kwan Soo; Bak, Young-Tae.

In: The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi, Vol. 59, No. 3, 01.03.2012, p. 211-217.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0411bdead2eb44729091046b05b1d613,
title = "[Clinicopathologic features of cases with negative pathologic results after endoscopic submucosal dissection].",
abstract = "Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is accepted as a standard treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC) and gastric adenoma. Occasionally, tumorous lesion is not found and pathologic discrepancies can occur after ESD. The aim of this study was to analyze the factors affecting the negative pathologic results after ESD. We retrospectively reviewed the data from all patients with gastric neoplasm (276 EGC and 516 gastric adenomas) who were treated with ESD during past 3 years and enrolled the patients who had negative pathologic results. Out of 792 patients treated with ESD, 27 patients (3.4{\%}) were eligible for inclusion. Among the 27 patients, factors affecting the negative pathologic results were, most commonly, the focal lesion (n=13, 48.2{\%}) which was small enough to be removed completely during pre-ESD biopsy, followed by pathologic discrepancies (n=11, 40.7{\%}) between pathologists and lastly the operator factor (n=3, 11.1{\%}) dissecting incorrect lesions. Of the focal lesions, the initial pathologic diagnoses were adenocarcinoma in 11 cases (84.6{\%}). In cases with pathologic discrepancies, all the pretreatment diagnoses were adenoma with low grade dysplasia. In cases caused by operator factors, intestinal metaplasia was accompanied by elevated adenoma in all cases. To decrease negative pathologic results after ESD, an endoscopist should perform ESD after sufficient communication with pathologists, especially for adenoma with low grade dysplasia, and choose correct lesion, especially located at the antrum and associated with intestinal metaplasia. The possibility of total removal of small lesions even by forcep biopsy should be considered.",
author = "Kwon, {Min Jung} and Park, {Jong Jae} and Yun, {Jae Won} and Noh, {Hye Jin} and Yoon, {Dae Woong} and Chang, {Won Jin} and Oh, {Ha Young} and Baek-Hui Kim and Hyunjoo Lee and Joo, {Moon Kyung} and Beomjae Lee and Kim, {Ji Hoon} and Yeon, {Jong Eun} and Kim, {Jae Seon} and Byun, {Kwan Soo} and Young-Tae Bak",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4166/kjg.2012.59.3.211",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "211--217",
journal = "The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi",
issn = "1598-9992",
publisher = "Korean Society of Gastroenterology",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - [Clinicopathologic features of cases with negative pathologic results after endoscopic submucosal dissection].

AU - Kwon, Min Jung

AU - Park, Jong Jae

AU - Yun, Jae Won

AU - Noh, Hye Jin

AU - Yoon, Dae Woong

AU - Chang, Won Jin

AU - Oh, Ha Young

AU - Kim, Baek-Hui

AU - Lee, Hyunjoo

AU - Joo, Moon Kyung

AU - Lee, Beomjae

AU - Kim, Ji Hoon

AU - Yeon, Jong Eun

AU - Kim, Jae Seon

AU - Byun, Kwan Soo

AU - Bak, Young-Tae

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is accepted as a standard treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC) and gastric adenoma. Occasionally, tumorous lesion is not found and pathologic discrepancies can occur after ESD. The aim of this study was to analyze the factors affecting the negative pathologic results after ESD. We retrospectively reviewed the data from all patients with gastric neoplasm (276 EGC and 516 gastric adenomas) who were treated with ESD during past 3 years and enrolled the patients who had negative pathologic results. Out of 792 patients treated with ESD, 27 patients (3.4%) were eligible for inclusion. Among the 27 patients, factors affecting the negative pathologic results were, most commonly, the focal lesion (n=13, 48.2%) which was small enough to be removed completely during pre-ESD biopsy, followed by pathologic discrepancies (n=11, 40.7%) between pathologists and lastly the operator factor (n=3, 11.1%) dissecting incorrect lesions. Of the focal lesions, the initial pathologic diagnoses were adenocarcinoma in 11 cases (84.6%). In cases with pathologic discrepancies, all the pretreatment diagnoses were adenoma with low grade dysplasia. In cases caused by operator factors, intestinal metaplasia was accompanied by elevated adenoma in all cases. To decrease negative pathologic results after ESD, an endoscopist should perform ESD after sufficient communication with pathologists, especially for adenoma with low grade dysplasia, and choose correct lesion, especially located at the antrum and associated with intestinal metaplasia. The possibility of total removal of small lesions even by forcep biopsy should be considered.

AB - Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is accepted as a standard treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC) and gastric adenoma. Occasionally, tumorous lesion is not found and pathologic discrepancies can occur after ESD. The aim of this study was to analyze the factors affecting the negative pathologic results after ESD. We retrospectively reviewed the data from all patients with gastric neoplasm (276 EGC and 516 gastric adenomas) who were treated with ESD during past 3 years and enrolled the patients who had negative pathologic results. Out of 792 patients treated with ESD, 27 patients (3.4%) were eligible for inclusion. Among the 27 patients, factors affecting the negative pathologic results were, most commonly, the focal lesion (n=13, 48.2%) which was small enough to be removed completely during pre-ESD biopsy, followed by pathologic discrepancies (n=11, 40.7%) between pathologists and lastly the operator factor (n=3, 11.1%) dissecting incorrect lesions. Of the focal lesions, the initial pathologic diagnoses were adenocarcinoma in 11 cases (84.6%). In cases with pathologic discrepancies, all the pretreatment diagnoses were adenoma with low grade dysplasia. In cases caused by operator factors, intestinal metaplasia was accompanied by elevated adenoma in all cases. To decrease negative pathologic results after ESD, an endoscopist should perform ESD after sufficient communication with pathologists, especially for adenoma with low grade dysplasia, and choose correct lesion, especially located at the antrum and associated with intestinal metaplasia. The possibility of total removal of small lesions even by forcep biopsy should be considered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864300419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864300419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4166/kjg.2012.59.3.211

DO - 10.4166/kjg.2012.59.3.211

M3 - Article

C2 - 22460569

AN - SCOPUS:84864300419

VL - 59

SP - 211

EP - 217

JO - The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi

JF - The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi

SN - 1598-9992

IS - 3

ER -