Cognitive stimulation as a therapeutic modality for dementia: A meta-analysis

Kayoung Kim, Ji Won Han, Yoonseop So, Jiyeong Seo, You Joung Kim, Joon Hyuk Park, Seok Bum Lee, Jung Jae Lee, Hyun-Ghang Jeong, Tae Hui Kim, Ki Woong Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective Although cognitive stimulation (CS) is one of the most popular non-pharmacological interventions for people with dementia, its efficacy is still debatable. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of CS in people with dementia. Methods Data sources were identified by searching PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, psychINFO, and Cochrane Reviews Library. A total of 7,354 articles were identified, and of these, 30 RCTs were selected based on the selection criteria. Of these 30 RCTs, 14 were finally included in our meta-analysis [731 participants with dementia; 412 received CS (CS group) and 319 received usual care (control group)]. Results We found that the people with dementia had a moderate benefit from CS. The mean difference between the CS and control groups was 2.21 [95% CI (0.93, 3.49), Z=3.38, p=0.00007] in the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognition and 1.41 [95% CI (0.98, 1.84), Z=6.39, p<0.00001] in the Mini-Mental State Examination. CS also improved quality of life in people with dementia [95% CI (0.72, 3.38), Z=3.02, p=0.003]. Conclusion CS is effective for improving cognition and quality of life in people with dementia; however, its effects were small to moderate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)626-639
Number of pages14
JournalPsychiatry Investigation
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Dementia
Meta-Analysis
Randomized Controlled Trials
Cognition
Therapeutics
Quality of Life
Control Groups
Information Storage and Retrieval
PubMed
MEDLINE
Patient Selection
Libraries
Alzheimer Disease

Keywords

  • Cognition
  • Cognitive stimulation
  • Dementia
  • Meta-analysis
  • Quality of life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Kim, K., Han, J. W., So, Y., Seo, J., Kim, Y. J., Park, J. H., ... Kim, K. W. (2017). Cognitive stimulation as a therapeutic modality for dementia: A meta-analysis. Psychiatry Investigation, 14(5), 626-639. https://doi.org/10.4306/pi.2017.14.5.626

Cognitive stimulation as a therapeutic modality for dementia : A meta-analysis. / Kim, Kayoung; Han, Ji Won; So, Yoonseop; Seo, Jiyeong; Kim, You Joung; Park, Joon Hyuk; Lee, Seok Bum; Lee, Jung Jae; Jeong, Hyun-Ghang; Kim, Tae Hui; Kim, Ki Woong.

In: Psychiatry Investigation, Vol. 14, No. 5, 01.09.2017, p. 626-639.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, K, Han, JW, So, Y, Seo, J, Kim, YJ, Park, JH, Lee, SB, Lee, JJ, Jeong, H-G, Kim, TH & Kim, KW 2017, 'Cognitive stimulation as a therapeutic modality for dementia: A meta-analysis', Psychiatry Investigation, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 626-639. https://doi.org/10.4306/pi.2017.14.5.626
Kim, Kayoung ; Han, Ji Won ; So, Yoonseop ; Seo, Jiyeong ; Kim, You Joung ; Park, Joon Hyuk ; Lee, Seok Bum ; Lee, Jung Jae ; Jeong, Hyun-Ghang ; Kim, Tae Hui ; Kim, Ki Woong. / Cognitive stimulation as a therapeutic modality for dementia : A meta-analysis. In: Psychiatry Investigation. 2017 ; Vol. 14, No. 5. pp. 626-639.
@article{e0dffb797c274903b7626691a7301322,
title = "Cognitive stimulation as a therapeutic modality for dementia: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "Objective Although cognitive stimulation (CS) is one of the most popular non-pharmacological interventions for people with dementia, its efficacy is still debatable. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of CS in people with dementia. Methods Data sources were identified by searching PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, psychINFO, and Cochrane Reviews Library. A total of 7,354 articles were identified, and of these, 30 RCTs were selected based on the selection criteria. Of these 30 RCTs, 14 were finally included in our meta-analysis [731 participants with dementia; 412 received CS (CS group) and 319 received usual care (control group)]. Results We found that the people with dementia had a moderate benefit from CS. The mean difference between the CS and control groups was 2.21 [95{\%} CI (0.93, 3.49), Z=3.38, p=0.00007] in the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognition and 1.41 [95{\%} CI (0.98, 1.84), Z=6.39, p<0.00001] in the Mini-Mental State Examination. CS also improved quality of life in people with dementia [95{\%} CI (0.72, 3.38), Z=3.02, p=0.003]. Conclusion CS is effective for improving cognition and quality of life in people with dementia; however, its effects were small to moderate.",
keywords = "Cognition, Cognitive stimulation, Dementia, Meta-analysis, Quality of life",
author = "Kayoung Kim and Han, {Ji Won} and Yoonseop So and Jiyeong Seo and Kim, {You Joung} and Park, {Joon Hyuk} and Lee, {Seok Bum} and Lee, {Jung Jae} and Hyun-Ghang Jeong and Kim, {Tae Hui} and Kim, {Ki Woong}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4306/pi.2017.14.5.626",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "626--639",
journal = "Psychiatry Investigation",
issn = "1738-3684",
publisher = "Korean Neuropsychiatric Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognitive stimulation as a therapeutic modality for dementia

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Kim, Kayoung

AU - Han, Ji Won

AU - So, Yoonseop

AU - Seo, Jiyeong

AU - Kim, You Joung

AU - Park, Joon Hyuk

AU - Lee, Seok Bum

AU - Lee, Jung Jae

AU - Jeong, Hyun-Ghang

AU - Kim, Tae Hui

AU - Kim, Ki Woong

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Objective Although cognitive stimulation (CS) is one of the most popular non-pharmacological interventions for people with dementia, its efficacy is still debatable. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of CS in people with dementia. Methods Data sources were identified by searching PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, psychINFO, and Cochrane Reviews Library. A total of 7,354 articles were identified, and of these, 30 RCTs were selected based on the selection criteria. Of these 30 RCTs, 14 were finally included in our meta-analysis [731 participants with dementia; 412 received CS (CS group) and 319 received usual care (control group)]. Results We found that the people with dementia had a moderate benefit from CS. The mean difference between the CS and control groups was 2.21 [95% CI (0.93, 3.49), Z=3.38, p=0.00007] in the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognition and 1.41 [95% CI (0.98, 1.84), Z=6.39, p<0.00001] in the Mini-Mental State Examination. CS also improved quality of life in people with dementia [95% CI (0.72, 3.38), Z=3.02, p=0.003]. Conclusion CS is effective for improving cognition and quality of life in people with dementia; however, its effects were small to moderate.

AB - Objective Although cognitive stimulation (CS) is one of the most popular non-pharmacological interventions for people with dementia, its efficacy is still debatable. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of CS in people with dementia. Methods Data sources were identified by searching PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, psychINFO, and Cochrane Reviews Library. A total of 7,354 articles were identified, and of these, 30 RCTs were selected based on the selection criteria. Of these 30 RCTs, 14 were finally included in our meta-analysis [731 participants with dementia; 412 received CS (CS group) and 319 received usual care (control group)]. Results We found that the people with dementia had a moderate benefit from CS. The mean difference between the CS and control groups was 2.21 [95% CI (0.93, 3.49), Z=3.38, p=0.00007] in the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognition and 1.41 [95% CI (0.98, 1.84), Z=6.39, p<0.00001] in the Mini-Mental State Examination. CS also improved quality of life in people with dementia [95% CI (0.72, 3.38), Z=3.02, p=0.003]. Conclusion CS is effective for improving cognition and quality of life in people with dementia; however, its effects were small to moderate.

KW - Cognition

KW - Cognitive stimulation

KW - Dementia

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Quality of life

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029772050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029772050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4306/pi.2017.14.5.626

DO - 10.4306/pi.2017.14.5.626

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85029772050

VL - 14

SP - 626

EP - 639

JO - Psychiatry Investigation

JF - Psychiatry Investigation

SN - 1738-3684

IS - 5

ER -