Comparative efficacy of family and group treatment for adolescent substance abuse

Douglas C. Smith, James A. Hall, Julie K. Williams, Hyonggin An, Nathan Gotman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Due to the continuing prevalence of adolescent substance abuse, promising treatment models need to be developed and evaluated. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two promising models, Strengths Oriented Family Therapy (SOFT) and The Seven Challenges® (7C). Adolescents who qualified for outpatient treatment and agreed to participate in our study were randomly assigned to one of the two treatments and assessed at 3 and 6-months following baseline. Using a two-part, random-effects model, we examined the odds of achieving abstinence or full symptom remission between treatments and over time. For those not achieving full abstinence or full problem remission, we investigated whether frequency of use or symptom severity were reduced at follow-up. Participants in both SOFT and 7C demonstrated significant reductions in substance use and related problems, but treatments did not differ at 3 and 6 months following baseline. Overall, treatment services were delivered as planned. Both SOFT and 7C were efficacious with adolescents who abuse substances, as participants in both conditions were significantly more likely to be in symptom remission or abstinent at follow-up interviews versus at baseline. Replication studies are needed that address this study's limitations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-136
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal on Addictions
Volume15
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006 Dec 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Substance-Related Disorders
Family Therapy
Therapeutics
Outpatients
Interviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Comparative efficacy of family and group treatment for adolescent substance abuse. / Smith, Douglas C.; Hall, James A.; Williams, Julie K.; An, Hyonggin; Gotman, Nathan.

In: American Journal on Addictions, Vol. 15, No. SUPPL. 1, 01.12.2006, p. 131-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, Douglas C. ; Hall, James A. ; Williams, Julie K. ; An, Hyonggin ; Gotman, Nathan. / Comparative efficacy of family and group treatment for adolescent substance abuse. In: American Journal on Addictions. 2006 ; Vol. 15, No. SUPPL. 1. pp. 131-136.
@article{9ef437b46a5e4249b6931ca19846b94b,
title = "Comparative efficacy of family and group treatment for adolescent substance abuse",
abstract = "Due to the continuing prevalence of adolescent substance abuse, promising treatment models need to be developed and evaluated. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two promising models, Strengths Oriented Family Therapy (SOFT) and The Seven Challenges{\circledR} (7C). Adolescents who qualified for outpatient treatment and agreed to participate in our study were randomly assigned to one of the two treatments and assessed at 3 and 6-months following baseline. Using a two-part, random-effects model, we examined the odds of achieving abstinence or full symptom remission between treatments and over time. For those not achieving full abstinence or full problem remission, we investigated whether frequency of use or symptom severity were reduced at follow-up. Participants in both SOFT and 7C demonstrated significant reductions in substance use and related problems, but treatments did not differ at 3 and 6 months following baseline. Overall, treatment services were delivered as planned. Both SOFT and 7C were efficacious with adolescents who abuse substances, as participants in both conditions were significantly more likely to be in symptom remission or abstinent at follow-up interviews versus at baseline. Replication studies are needed that address this study's limitations.",
author = "Smith, {Douglas C.} and Hall, {James A.} and Williams, {Julie K.} and Hyonggin An and Nathan Gotman",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10550490601006253",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "131--136",
journal = "American Journal on Addictions",
issn = "1055-0496",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative efficacy of family and group treatment for adolescent substance abuse

AU - Smith, Douglas C.

AU - Hall, James A.

AU - Williams, Julie K.

AU - An, Hyonggin

AU - Gotman, Nathan

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - Due to the continuing prevalence of adolescent substance abuse, promising treatment models need to be developed and evaluated. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two promising models, Strengths Oriented Family Therapy (SOFT) and The Seven Challenges® (7C). Adolescents who qualified for outpatient treatment and agreed to participate in our study were randomly assigned to one of the two treatments and assessed at 3 and 6-months following baseline. Using a two-part, random-effects model, we examined the odds of achieving abstinence or full symptom remission between treatments and over time. For those not achieving full abstinence or full problem remission, we investigated whether frequency of use or symptom severity were reduced at follow-up. Participants in both SOFT and 7C demonstrated significant reductions in substance use and related problems, but treatments did not differ at 3 and 6 months following baseline. Overall, treatment services were delivered as planned. Both SOFT and 7C were efficacious with adolescents who abuse substances, as participants in both conditions were significantly more likely to be in symptom remission or abstinent at follow-up interviews versus at baseline. Replication studies are needed that address this study's limitations.

AB - Due to the continuing prevalence of adolescent substance abuse, promising treatment models need to be developed and evaluated. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two promising models, Strengths Oriented Family Therapy (SOFT) and The Seven Challenges® (7C). Adolescents who qualified for outpatient treatment and agreed to participate in our study were randomly assigned to one of the two treatments and assessed at 3 and 6-months following baseline. Using a two-part, random-effects model, we examined the odds of achieving abstinence or full symptom remission between treatments and over time. For those not achieving full abstinence or full problem remission, we investigated whether frequency of use or symptom severity were reduced at follow-up. Participants in both SOFT and 7C demonstrated significant reductions in substance use and related problems, but treatments did not differ at 3 and 6 months following baseline. Overall, treatment services were delivered as planned. Both SOFT and 7C were efficacious with adolescents who abuse substances, as participants in both conditions were significantly more likely to be in symptom remission or abstinent at follow-up interviews versus at baseline. Replication studies are needed that address this study's limitations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845904644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845904644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10550490601006253

DO - 10.1080/10550490601006253

M3 - Article

C2 - 17182429

AN - SCOPUS:33845904644

VL - 15

SP - 131

EP - 136

JO - American Journal on Addictions

JF - American Journal on Addictions

SN - 1055-0496

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -