Comparative study of cryostripping and endovenous laser therapy for varicose veins

Mid-term results

Kwang Hyoung Lee, Jae Ho Chung, Kwang Taik Kim, Sung Ho Lee, Ho Sung Son, Jae-Seung Jung, Hee Jung Kim, Seung Hun Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Conventional stripping is considered to be the standard procedure for great saphenous vein (GSV)varicosities, but many other alternative treatments such as cryostripping, endovenous laser therapy (EVLT), radiofrequencyablation, and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy have been developed. Among them, both cryostrippingand laser therapy have been reported to be less traumatic, with lower rates of complications and recurrenceswhen compared to conventional stripping. To compare the efficacy of these treatments, we have analyzed and compared the mid-term clinical outcomes of cryostripping and EVLT. Methods: Patients diagnosed with varicoseveins of the GSV and treated with cryostripping or laser therapy between September 2008 and April 2013 wereenrolled in this study. Duplex ultrasonography was used for the diagnosis and evaluation of varicosity and reflux,and the clinical-etiology-anatomy-pathophysiology classification was used to measure the clinical severity. The symptoms,Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), recurrence rates, and complication rates of the cryostripping and lasertherapy groups were analyzed and compared. Results: A total of 68 patients were enrolled in this study. 32 patients were treated with cryostripping, and 36 patients were treated with laser therapy. The median follow-up periodwas 29.6 months. Recurrence was noted in three patients from the cryostripping group and in two patientsfrom the EVLT group. There was no difference in the VCSS score, operative time, duration of hospital stay, andcomplication rate between the cryostripping group and the EVLT group. Conclusion: The mid-term clinical outcomesof cryostripping were not inferior to those of EVLT. Further, considering its cost-effectiveness, cryostripping seemsto be a safe and feasible method for the treatment of varicose veins.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)345-350
Number of pages6
JournalKorean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume48
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Varicose Veins
Laser Therapy
Saphenous Vein
Recurrence
Sclerotherapy
Operative Time
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Ultrasonography
Length of Stay
Anatomy
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Cryostripping
  • Endovenous laser therapy
  • Varicose veins
  • Venous disease

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Comparative study of cryostripping and endovenous laser therapy for varicose veins : Mid-term results. / Lee, Kwang Hyoung; Chung, Jae Ho; Kim, Kwang Taik; Lee, Sung Ho; Son, Ho Sung; Jung, Jae-Seung; Kim, Hee Jung; Lee, Seung Hun.

In: Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 48, No. 5, 01.01.2015, p. 345-350.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{302d01f5d3be470d866bd6b204ed39f6,
title = "Comparative study of cryostripping and endovenous laser therapy for varicose veins: Mid-term results",
abstract = "Background: Conventional stripping is considered to be the standard procedure for great saphenous vein (GSV)varicosities, but many other alternative treatments such as cryostripping, endovenous laser therapy (EVLT), radiofrequencyablation, and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy have been developed. Among them, both cryostrippingand laser therapy have been reported to be less traumatic, with lower rates of complications and recurrenceswhen compared to conventional stripping. To compare the efficacy of these treatments, we have analyzed and compared the mid-term clinical outcomes of cryostripping and EVLT. Methods: Patients diagnosed with varicoseveins of the GSV and treated with cryostripping or laser therapy between September 2008 and April 2013 wereenrolled in this study. Duplex ultrasonography was used for the diagnosis and evaluation of varicosity and reflux,and the clinical-etiology-anatomy-pathophysiology classification was used to measure the clinical severity. The symptoms,Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), recurrence rates, and complication rates of the cryostripping and lasertherapy groups were analyzed and compared. Results: A total of 68 patients were enrolled in this study. 32 patients were treated with cryostripping, and 36 patients were treated with laser therapy. The median follow-up periodwas 29.6 months. Recurrence was noted in three patients from the cryostripping group and in two patientsfrom the EVLT group. There was no difference in the VCSS score, operative time, duration of hospital stay, andcomplication rate between the cryostripping group and the EVLT group. Conclusion: The mid-term clinical outcomesof cryostripping were not inferior to those of EVLT. Further, considering its cost-effectiveness, cryostripping seemsto be a safe and feasible method for the treatment of varicose veins.",
keywords = "Cryostripping, Endovenous laser therapy, Varicose veins, Venous disease",
author = "Lee, {Kwang Hyoung} and Chung, {Jae Ho} and Kim, {Kwang Taik} and Lee, {Sung Ho} and Son, {Ho Sung} and Jae-Seung Jung and Kim, {Hee Jung} and Lee, {Seung Hun}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5090/kjtcs.2015.48.5.345",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "345--350",
journal = "Cancer Research and Treatment",
issn = "1598-2998",
publisher = "Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative study of cryostripping and endovenous laser therapy for varicose veins

T2 - Mid-term results

AU - Lee, Kwang Hyoung

AU - Chung, Jae Ho

AU - Kim, Kwang Taik

AU - Lee, Sung Ho

AU - Son, Ho Sung

AU - Jung, Jae-Seung

AU - Kim, Hee Jung

AU - Lee, Seung Hun

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background: Conventional stripping is considered to be the standard procedure for great saphenous vein (GSV)varicosities, but many other alternative treatments such as cryostripping, endovenous laser therapy (EVLT), radiofrequencyablation, and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy have been developed. Among them, both cryostrippingand laser therapy have been reported to be less traumatic, with lower rates of complications and recurrenceswhen compared to conventional stripping. To compare the efficacy of these treatments, we have analyzed and compared the mid-term clinical outcomes of cryostripping and EVLT. Methods: Patients diagnosed with varicoseveins of the GSV and treated with cryostripping or laser therapy between September 2008 and April 2013 wereenrolled in this study. Duplex ultrasonography was used for the diagnosis and evaluation of varicosity and reflux,and the clinical-etiology-anatomy-pathophysiology classification was used to measure the clinical severity. The symptoms,Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), recurrence rates, and complication rates of the cryostripping and lasertherapy groups were analyzed and compared. Results: A total of 68 patients were enrolled in this study. 32 patients were treated with cryostripping, and 36 patients were treated with laser therapy. The median follow-up periodwas 29.6 months. Recurrence was noted in three patients from the cryostripping group and in two patientsfrom the EVLT group. There was no difference in the VCSS score, operative time, duration of hospital stay, andcomplication rate between the cryostripping group and the EVLT group. Conclusion: The mid-term clinical outcomesof cryostripping were not inferior to those of EVLT. Further, considering its cost-effectiveness, cryostripping seemsto be a safe and feasible method for the treatment of varicose veins.

AB - Background: Conventional stripping is considered to be the standard procedure for great saphenous vein (GSV)varicosities, but many other alternative treatments such as cryostripping, endovenous laser therapy (EVLT), radiofrequencyablation, and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy have been developed. Among them, both cryostrippingand laser therapy have been reported to be less traumatic, with lower rates of complications and recurrenceswhen compared to conventional stripping. To compare the efficacy of these treatments, we have analyzed and compared the mid-term clinical outcomes of cryostripping and EVLT. Methods: Patients diagnosed with varicoseveins of the GSV and treated with cryostripping or laser therapy between September 2008 and April 2013 wereenrolled in this study. Duplex ultrasonography was used for the diagnosis and evaluation of varicosity and reflux,and the clinical-etiology-anatomy-pathophysiology classification was used to measure the clinical severity. The symptoms,Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), recurrence rates, and complication rates of the cryostripping and lasertherapy groups were analyzed and compared. Results: A total of 68 patients were enrolled in this study. 32 patients were treated with cryostripping, and 36 patients were treated with laser therapy. The median follow-up periodwas 29.6 months. Recurrence was noted in three patients from the cryostripping group and in two patientsfrom the EVLT group. There was no difference in the VCSS score, operative time, duration of hospital stay, andcomplication rate between the cryostripping group and the EVLT group. Conclusion: The mid-term clinical outcomesof cryostripping were not inferior to those of EVLT. Further, considering its cost-effectiveness, cryostripping seemsto be a safe and feasible method for the treatment of varicose veins.

KW - Cryostripping

KW - Endovenous laser therapy

KW - Varicose veins

KW - Venous disease

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979891757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979891757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5090/kjtcs.2015.48.5.345

DO - 10.5090/kjtcs.2015.48.5.345

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 345

EP - 350

JO - Cancer Research and Treatment

JF - Cancer Research and Treatment

SN - 1598-2998

IS - 5

ER -