Comparative study of two daylighting analysis methods with regard to window orientation and interior wall reflectance

Yeo Beom Yoon, Rashmi Manandhar, Kwang Ho Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The accuracy and speed of the daylighting analysis developed for use in EnergyPlus is better than its predecessors. In EnergyPlus, the detailed method uses the Split-flux algorithm whereas the DElight method uses the Radiosity algorithm. Many existing studies have addressed the two methods, either individually or compared with other daylight analysis methods like Ray tracing but still there is lack of detailed comparative study of these two methods. Our previous studies show that the Split-flux method overestimates the illuminance, especially for the areas away from the window. The Radiosity method has the advantage of accurately predicting this illuminance because of how it deals with the diffuse light. For this study, the EnergyPlus model, which has been calibrated using data measured in a real building in previous studies, has also been used. The calibrated model has a south oriented window only. This model is then used to analyze the interior illuminance inside the room for north, west and east orientation of the window by rotating the model and by changing the wall reflectance of the model with south oriented window. Direct and diffuse component of the illuminance as well as the algorithms have been compared for a detailed analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5825-5846
Number of pages22
JournalEnergies
Volume7
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Daylighting
Reflectance
Comparative Study
Interior
Radiosity
Fluxes
Ray tracing
Model
Ray Tracing
Rotating

Keywords

  • Daylighting algorithm
  • EnergyPlus
  • Illuminance
  • Radiosity method
  • Split-flux method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Energy (miscellaneous)
  • Control and Optimization
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Comparative study of two daylighting analysis methods with regard to window orientation and interior wall reflectance. / Yoon, Yeo Beom; Manandhar, Rashmi; Lee, Kwang Ho.

In: Energies, Vol. 7, No. 9, 01.01.2014, p. 5825-5846.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f22d38669d68473cad143e3af3e83612,
title = "Comparative study of two daylighting analysis methods with regard to window orientation and interior wall reflectance",
abstract = "The accuracy and speed of the daylighting analysis developed for use in EnergyPlus is better than its predecessors. In EnergyPlus, the detailed method uses the Split-flux algorithm whereas the DElight method uses the Radiosity algorithm. Many existing studies have addressed the two methods, either individually or compared with other daylight analysis methods like Ray tracing but still there is lack of detailed comparative study of these two methods. Our previous studies show that the Split-flux method overestimates the illuminance, especially for the areas away from the window. The Radiosity method has the advantage of accurately predicting this illuminance because of how it deals with the diffuse light. For this study, the EnergyPlus model, which has been calibrated using data measured in a real building in previous studies, has also been used. The calibrated model has a south oriented window only. This model is then used to analyze the interior illuminance inside the room for north, west and east orientation of the window by rotating the model and by changing the wall reflectance of the model with south oriented window. Direct and diffuse component of the illuminance as well as the algorithms have been compared for a detailed analysis.",
keywords = "Daylighting algorithm, EnergyPlus, Illuminance, Radiosity method, Split-flux method",
author = "Yoon, {Yeo Beom} and Rashmi Manandhar and Lee, {Kwang Ho}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3390/en7095825",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "5825--5846",
journal = "Energies",
issn = "1996-1073",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative study of two daylighting analysis methods with regard to window orientation and interior wall reflectance

AU - Yoon, Yeo Beom

AU - Manandhar, Rashmi

AU - Lee, Kwang Ho

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - The accuracy and speed of the daylighting analysis developed for use in EnergyPlus is better than its predecessors. In EnergyPlus, the detailed method uses the Split-flux algorithm whereas the DElight method uses the Radiosity algorithm. Many existing studies have addressed the two methods, either individually or compared with other daylight analysis methods like Ray tracing but still there is lack of detailed comparative study of these two methods. Our previous studies show that the Split-flux method overestimates the illuminance, especially for the areas away from the window. The Radiosity method has the advantage of accurately predicting this illuminance because of how it deals with the diffuse light. For this study, the EnergyPlus model, which has been calibrated using data measured in a real building in previous studies, has also been used. The calibrated model has a south oriented window only. This model is then used to analyze the interior illuminance inside the room for north, west and east orientation of the window by rotating the model and by changing the wall reflectance of the model with south oriented window. Direct and diffuse component of the illuminance as well as the algorithms have been compared for a detailed analysis.

AB - The accuracy and speed of the daylighting analysis developed for use in EnergyPlus is better than its predecessors. In EnergyPlus, the detailed method uses the Split-flux algorithm whereas the DElight method uses the Radiosity algorithm. Many existing studies have addressed the two methods, either individually or compared with other daylight analysis methods like Ray tracing but still there is lack of detailed comparative study of these two methods. Our previous studies show that the Split-flux method overestimates the illuminance, especially for the areas away from the window. The Radiosity method has the advantage of accurately predicting this illuminance because of how it deals with the diffuse light. For this study, the EnergyPlus model, which has been calibrated using data measured in a real building in previous studies, has also been used. The calibrated model has a south oriented window only. This model is then used to analyze the interior illuminance inside the room for north, west and east orientation of the window by rotating the model and by changing the wall reflectance of the model with south oriented window. Direct and diffuse component of the illuminance as well as the algorithms have been compared for a detailed analysis.

KW - Daylighting algorithm

KW - EnergyPlus

KW - Illuminance

KW - Radiosity method

KW - Split-flux method

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907393337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907393337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/en7095825

DO - 10.3390/en7095825

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84907393337

VL - 7

SP - 5825

EP - 5846

JO - Energies

JF - Energies

SN - 1996-1073

IS - 9

ER -