Comparing the accuracy (trueness and precision) of models of fixed dental prostheses fabricated by digital and conventional workflows

Ji Young Sim, Yeon Jang, Woong Chul Kim, Hae-Young Kim, Dong Hwan Lee, Ji Hwan Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracy. Methods: A reference model was prepared with three prepared teeth for three types of restorations: single crown, 3-unit bridge, and inlay. Stone models were fabricated from conventional impressions. Digital impressions of the reference model were created using an intraoral scanner (digital models). Physical models were fabricated using a three-dimensional (3D) printer. Reference, stone, and 3D printed models were subsequently scanned using an industrial optical scanner; files were exported in a stereolithography file format. All datasets were superimposed using 3D analysis software to evaluate the accuracy of the complete arch and trueness of the preparations. One-way and two-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) were performed to compare the accuracy among the three model groups and evaluate the trueness among the three types of preparation. Results: For the complete arch, significant intergroup differences in precision were observed for the three groups (p <.001). However, no significant difference in trueness was found between the stone and digital models (p >.05). 3D printed models had the poorest accuracy. A two-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in trueness among the model groups (p <.001) and types of preparation (p <.001). Conclusions: Digital models had smaller root mean square values of trueness of the complete arch and preparations than stone models. However, the accuracy of the complete arch and trueness of the preparations of 3D printed models were inferior to those of the other groups.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Prosthodontic Research
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2018 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Dental Prosthesis
Workflow
Analysis of Variance
Inlays
Crowns
Tooth
Software
Datasets
Three Dimensional Printing

Keywords

  • 3D printed model
  • Accuracy
  • Intraoral scanner
  • Precision
  • Trueness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery
  • Dentistry (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Comparing the accuracy (trueness and precision) of models of fixed dental prostheses fabricated by digital and conventional workflows. / Sim, Ji Young; Jang, Yeon; Kim, Woong Chul; Kim, Hae-Young; Lee, Dong Hwan; Kim, Ji Hwan.

In: Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{707645435b5944cca95f97319c83cc5e,
title = "Comparing the accuracy (trueness and precision) of models of fixed dental prostheses fabricated by digital and conventional workflows",
abstract = "Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracy. Methods: A reference model was prepared with three prepared teeth for three types of restorations: single crown, 3-unit bridge, and inlay. Stone models were fabricated from conventional impressions. Digital impressions of the reference model were created using an intraoral scanner (digital models). Physical models were fabricated using a three-dimensional (3D) printer. Reference, stone, and 3D printed models were subsequently scanned using an industrial optical scanner; files were exported in a stereolithography file format. All datasets were superimposed using 3D analysis software to evaluate the accuracy of the complete arch and trueness of the preparations. One-way and two-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) were performed to compare the accuracy among the three model groups and evaluate the trueness among the three types of preparation. Results: For the complete arch, significant intergroup differences in precision were observed for the three groups (p <.001). However, no significant difference in trueness was found between the stone and digital models (p >.05). 3D printed models had the poorest accuracy. A two-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in trueness among the model groups (p <.001) and types of preparation (p <.001). Conclusions: Digital models had smaller root mean square values of trueness of the complete arch and preparations than stone models. However, the accuracy of the complete arch and trueness of the preparations of 3D printed models were inferior to those of the other groups.",
keywords = "3D printed model, Accuracy, Intraoral scanner, Precision, Trueness",
author = "Sim, {Ji Young} and Yeon Jang and Kim, {Woong Chul} and Hae-Young Kim and Lee, {Dong Hwan} and Kim, {Ji Hwan}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpor.2018.02.002",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Prosthodontic Research",
issn = "1883-1958",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing the accuracy (trueness and precision) of models of fixed dental prostheses fabricated by digital and conventional workflows

AU - Sim, Ji Young

AU - Jang, Yeon

AU - Kim, Woong Chul

AU - Kim, Hae-Young

AU - Lee, Dong Hwan

AU - Kim, Ji Hwan

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracy. Methods: A reference model was prepared with three prepared teeth for three types of restorations: single crown, 3-unit bridge, and inlay. Stone models were fabricated from conventional impressions. Digital impressions of the reference model were created using an intraoral scanner (digital models). Physical models were fabricated using a three-dimensional (3D) printer. Reference, stone, and 3D printed models were subsequently scanned using an industrial optical scanner; files were exported in a stereolithography file format. All datasets were superimposed using 3D analysis software to evaluate the accuracy of the complete arch and trueness of the preparations. One-way and two-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) were performed to compare the accuracy among the three model groups and evaluate the trueness among the three types of preparation. Results: For the complete arch, significant intergroup differences in precision were observed for the three groups (p <.001). However, no significant difference in trueness was found between the stone and digital models (p >.05). 3D printed models had the poorest accuracy. A two-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in trueness among the model groups (p <.001) and types of preparation (p <.001). Conclusions: Digital models had smaller root mean square values of trueness of the complete arch and preparations than stone models. However, the accuracy of the complete arch and trueness of the preparations of 3D printed models were inferior to those of the other groups.

AB - Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracy. Methods: A reference model was prepared with three prepared teeth for three types of restorations: single crown, 3-unit bridge, and inlay. Stone models were fabricated from conventional impressions. Digital impressions of the reference model were created using an intraoral scanner (digital models). Physical models were fabricated using a three-dimensional (3D) printer. Reference, stone, and 3D printed models were subsequently scanned using an industrial optical scanner; files were exported in a stereolithography file format. All datasets were superimposed using 3D analysis software to evaluate the accuracy of the complete arch and trueness of the preparations. One-way and two-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) were performed to compare the accuracy among the three model groups and evaluate the trueness among the three types of preparation. Results: For the complete arch, significant intergroup differences in precision were observed for the three groups (p <.001). However, no significant difference in trueness was found between the stone and digital models (p >.05). 3D printed models had the poorest accuracy. A two-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in trueness among the model groups (p <.001) and types of preparation (p <.001). Conclusions: Digital models had smaller root mean square values of trueness of the complete arch and preparations than stone models. However, the accuracy of the complete arch and trueness of the preparations of 3D printed models were inferior to those of the other groups.

KW - 3D printed model

KW - Accuracy

KW - Intraoral scanner

KW - Precision

KW - Trueness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044603363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044603363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpor.2018.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jpor.2018.02.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 29615324

AN - SCOPUS:85044603363

JO - Journal of Prosthodontic Research

JF - Journal of Prosthodontic Research

SN - 1883-1958

ER -