Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer

Chan Kyo Kim, Seung Hoon Kim, Dongil Choi, Min Ju Kim, Ho Kyung Chun, Soon Jin Lee, Jongmee Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare prospectively between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) for the local staging of rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a recent 8-month period, both 3-T MRI with a phased array coil and MDCT scanner were used to preoperatively examine 31 consecutive patients. Preoperatively, the 3 experienced reviewers independently assessed the MRI and MDCT findings for the depth of tumor invasion into the rectal wall (T). Regional lymph node metastasis (N) was assessed by the 3 reviewers working in consensus. For T staging, we used a modified T staging (≤T2, T3, and T4 staging). The results of the MRI and MDCT findings were compared based on the diagnosis of the resected specimens. RESULTS: At histopathology, T1 was identified in 8 patients, T2 in 6, and T3 in 17 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for T2 staging or less between MRI and MDCT were 93% and 79%, 88% and 76%, and 91% and 77%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for T3 between MRI and MDCT were 92% and 73%, 93% and 83%, and 92% and 78%, respectively; there was a statistically significant difference for the T2 and T3 staging or less (P < 0.01). For N staging, MRI and CT can predict accurately in 88% and 77%, respectively (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For local staging of rectal cancer, 3-T MRI is more accurate than MDCT for determining the depth of tumor invasion and the extent of lymph node metastasis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)853-859
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Nov 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Multidetector Computed Tomography
Rectal Neoplasms
Tomography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Lymph Nodes
Neoplasm Metastasis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • High-field-strength imaging
  • Magnetic resonance
  • MRI
  • Multidetector row computed tomography
  • Neoplasm
  • Rectum
  • Staging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer. / Kim, Chan Kyo; Kim, Seung Hoon; Choi, Dongil; Kim, Min Ju; Chun, Ho Kyung; Lee, Soon Jin; Lee, Jongmee.

In: Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, Vol. 31, No. 6, 01.11.2007, p. 853-859.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ab9b90208b3b47879664f49e192e4f9a,
title = "Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To compare prospectively between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) for the local staging of rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a recent 8-month period, both 3-T MRI with a phased array coil and MDCT scanner were used to preoperatively examine 31 consecutive patients. Preoperatively, the 3 experienced reviewers independently assessed the MRI and MDCT findings for the depth of tumor invasion into the rectal wall (T). Regional lymph node metastasis (N) was assessed by the 3 reviewers working in consensus. For T staging, we used a modified T staging (≤T2, T3, and T4 staging). The results of the MRI and MDCT findings were compared based on the diagnosis of the resected specimens. RESULTS: At histopathology, T1 was identified in 8 patients, T2 in 6, and T3 in 17 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for T2 staging or less between MRI and MDCT were 93{\%} and 79{\%}, 88{\%} and 76{\%}, and 91{\%} and 77{\%}, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for T3 between MRI and MDCT were 92{\%} and 73{\%}, 93{\%} and 83{\%}, and 92{\%} and 78{\%}, respectively; there was a statistically significant difference for the T2 and T3 staging or less (P < 0.01). For N staging, MRI and CT can predict accurately in 88{\%} and 77{\%}, respectively (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For local staging of rectal cancer, 3-T MRI is more accurate than MDCT for determining the depth of tumor invasion and the extent of lymph node metastasis.",
keywords = "High-field-strength imaging, Magnetic resonance, MRI, Multidetector row computed tomography, Neoplasm, Rectum, Staging",
author = "Kim, {Chan Kyo} and Kim, {Seung Hoon} and Dongil Choi and Kim, {Min Ju} and Chun, {Ho Kyung} and Lee, {Soon Jin} and Jongmee Lee",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/RCT.0b013e318038fc84",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "853--859",
journal = "Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography",
issn = "0363-8715",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer

AU - Kim, Chan Kyo

AU - Kim, Seung Hoon

AU - Choi, Dongil

AU - Kim, Min Ju

AU - Chun, Ho Kyung

AU - Lee, Soon Jin

AU - Lee, Jongmee

PY - 2007/11/1

Y1 - 2007/11/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare prospectively between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) for the local staging of rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a recent 8-month period, both 3-T MRI with a phased array coil and MDCT scanner were used to preoperatively examine 31 consecutive patients. Preoperatively, the 3 experienced reviewers independently assessed the MRI and MDCT findings for the depth of tumor invasion into the rectal wall (T). Regional lymph node metastasis (N) was assessed by the 3 reviewers working in consensus. For T staging, we used a modified T staging (≤T2, T3, and T4 staging). The results of the MRI and MDCT findings were compared based on the diagnosis of the resected specimens. RESULTS: At histopathology, T1 was identified in 8 patients, T2 in 6, and T3 in 17 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for T2 staging or less between MRI and MDCT were 93% and 79%, 88% and 76%, and 91% and 77%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for T3 between MRI and MDCT were 92% and 73%, 93% and 83%, and 92% and 78%, respectively; there was a statistically significant difference for the T2 and T3 staging or less (P < 0.01). For N staging, MRI and CT can predict accurately in 88% and 77%, respectively (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For local staging of rectal cancer, 3-T MRI is more accurate than MDCT for determining the depth of tumor invasion and the extent of lymph node metastasis.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To compare prospectively between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) for the local staging of rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a recent 8-month period, both 3-T MRI with a phased array coil and MDCT scanner were used to preoperatively examine 31 consecutive patients. Preoperatively, the 3 experienced reviewers independently assessed the MRI and MDCT findings for the depth of tumor invasion into the rectal wall (T). Regional lymph node metastasis (N) was assessed by the 3 reviewers working in consensus. For T staging, we used a modified T staging (≤T2, T3, and T4 staging). The results of the MRI and MDCT findings were compared based on the diagnosis of the resected specimens. RESULTS: At histopathology, T1 was identified in 8 patients, T2 in 6, and T3 in 17 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for T2 staging or less between MRI and MDCT were 93% and 79%, 88% and 76%, and 91% and 77%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for T3 between MRI and MDCT were 92% and 73%, 93% and 83%, and 92% and 78%, respectively; there was a statistically significant difference for the T2 and T3 staging or less (P < 0.01). For N staging, MRI and CT can predict accurately in 88% and 77%, respectively (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For local staging of rectal cancer, 3-T MRI is more accurate than MDCT for determining the depth of tumor invasion and the extent of lymph node metastasis.

KW - High-field-strength imaging

KW - Magnetic resonance

KW - MRI

KW - Multidetector row computed tomography

KW - Neoplasm

KW - Rectum

KW - Staging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36649021616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36649021616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318038fc84

DO - 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318038fc84

M3 - Article

C2 - 18043346

AN - SCOPUS:36649021616

VL - 31

SP - 853

EP - 859

JO - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

JF - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

SN - 0363-8715

IS - 6

ER -