Comparison of delirium screening instruments for the elderly

Young Whee Lee, Sung Ok Chang, Eun Suk Kong, Nam Cho Kim, Chun Gill Kim, Hee Kyung Kim, Misoon Song, Soo Yeon Ahn, Myung Ok Cho, Kyung Sook Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: This study was undertaken to identify which delirium screening instrument would be more useful in clinical practice. Methods: Data were collected from 118 nurses from six hospitals in five provinces in Korea. For the delirium screening three instruments were compared: NEECHAM Confusion Scale (NEECHAM), Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC), Delirium Observation Scale (DOS). The MMSE-K was used for concurrent validity. The nurse subjects were surveyed as to the practical clinical value of each instrument. Cronbach's α coefficient and Kuder-Richardson 20 were used to confirm the reliability. Results: The range of three scales reliability was .70~.82 and the range of correlation coefficient was .63~.82 with MMSE-K. For sensitivity of NEECHAM, Nu-DESC and DOS was 1.00, 1.00 and 0.81 respectively and specificity NEECHAM, Nu-DESC and DOS was 0.88, 0.89 and 0.89 respectively. Nurses rated the practical use of the DOS scale as significantly easier to use than the NEECHAM and Nu-DESC. Conclusion: NEECHAM, Nu-DESC and DOS scales were acceptable in terms of reliability, validity, sensitivity and specificity. However, nurses rated the DOS scale as easier scale to use and had more relevance to their practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)655-664
Number of pages10
JournalKorean Journal of Adult Nursing
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Delirium
Observation
Nursing
Nurses
Confusion
Korea
Reproducibility of Results

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Delirium

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Lee, Y. W., Chang, S. O., Kong, E. S., Kim, N. C., Kim, C. G., Kim, H. K., ... Choi, K. S. (2013). Comparison of delirium screening instruments for the elderly. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, 25(6), 655-664. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2012.24.6.655

Comparison of delirium screening instruments for the elderly. / Lee, Young Whee; Chang, Sung Ok; Kong, Eun Suk; Kim, Nam Cho; Kim, Chun Gill; Kim, Hee Kyung; Song, Misoon; Ahn, Soo Yeon; Cho, Myung Ok; Choi, Kyung Sook.

In: Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, Vol. 25, No. 6, 01.12.2013, p. 655-664.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, YW, Chang, SO, Kong, ES, Kim, NC, Kim, CG, Kim, HK, Song, M, Ahn, SY, Cho, MO & Choi, KS 2013, 'Comparison of delirium screening instruments for the elderly', Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 655-664. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2012.24.6.655
Lee, Young Whee ; Chang, Sung Ok ; Kong, Eun Suk ; Kim, Nam Cho ; Kim, Chun Gill ; Kim, Hee Kyung ; Song, Misoon ; Ahn, Soo Yeon ; Cho, Myung Ok ; Choi, Kyung Sook. / Comparison of delirium screening instruments for the elderly. In: Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2013 ; Vol. 25, No. 6. pp. 655-664.
@article{f84fecde0b2f4a37a070ba88cbe6cfbc,
title = "Comparison of delirium screening instruments for the elderly",
abstract = "Purpose: This study was undertaken to identify which delirium screening instrument would be more useful in clinical practice. Methods: Data were collected from 118 nurses from six hospitals in five provinces in Korea. For the delirium screening three instruments were compared: NEECHAM Confusion Scale (NEECHAM), Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC), Delirium Observation Scale (DOS). The MMSE-K was used for concurrent validity. The nurse subjects were surveyed as to the practical clinical value of each instrument. Cronbach's α coefficient and Kuder-Richardson 20 were used to confirm the reliability. Results: The range of three scales reliability was .70~.82 and the range of correlation coefficient was .63~.82 with MMSE-K. For sensitivity of NEECHAM, Nu-DESC and DOS was 1.00, 1.00 and 0.81 respectively and specificity NEECHAM, Nu-DESC and DOS was 0.88, 0.89 and 0.89 respectively. Nurses rated the practical use of the DOS scale as significantly easier to use than the NEECHAM and Nu-DESC. Conclusion: NEECHAM, Nu-DESC and DOS scales were acceptable in terms of reliability, validity, sensitivity and specificity. However, nurses rated the DOS scale as easier scale to use and had more relevance to their practice.",
keywords = "Aged, Delirium",
author = "Lee, {Young Whee} and Chang, {Sung Ok} and Kong, {Eun Suk} and Kim, {Nam Cho} and Kim, {Chun Gill} and Kim, {Hee Kyung} and Misoon Song and Ahn, {Soo Yeon} and Cho, {Myung Ok} and Choi, {Kyung Sook}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7475/kjan.2012.24.6.655",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "655--664",
journal = "Korean Journal of Adult Nursing",
issn = "1225-4886",
publisher = "Korean Association of Medical Journal Edirors",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of delirium screening instruments for the elderly

AU - Lee, Young Whee

AU - Chang, Sung Ok

AU - Kong, Eun Suk

AU - Kim, Nam Cho

AU - Kim, Chun Gill

AU - Kim, Hee Kyung

AU - Song, Misoon

AU - Ahn, Soo Yeon

AU - Cho, Myung Ok

AU - Choi, Kyung Sook

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - Purpose: This study was undertaken to identify which delirium screening instrument would be more useful in clinical practice. Methods: Data were collected from 118 nurses from six hospitals in five provinces in Korea. For the delirium screening three instruments were compared: NEECHAM Confusion Scale (NEECHAM), Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC), Delirium Observation Scale (DOS). The MMSE-K was used for concurrent validity. The nurse subjects were surveyed as to the practical clinical value of each instrument. Cronbach's α coefficient and Kuder-Richardson 20 were used to confirm the reliability. Results: The range of three scales reliability was .70~.82 and the range of correlation coefficient was .63~.82 with MMSE-K. For sensitivity of NEECHAM, Nu-DESC and DOS was 1.00, 1.00 and 0.81 respectively and specificity NEECHAM, Nu-DESC and DOS was 0.88, 0.89 and 0.89 respectively. Nurses rated the practical use of the DOS scale as significantly easier to use than the NEECHAM and Nu-DESC. Conclusion: NEECHAM, Nu-DESC and DOS scales were acceptable in terms of reliability, validity, sensitivity and specificity. However, nurses rated the DOS scale as easier scale to use and had more relevance to their practice.

AB - Purpose: This study was undertaken to identify which delirium screening instrument would be more useful in clinical practice. Methods: Data were collected from 118 nurses from six hospitals in five provinces in Korea. For the delirium screening three instruments were compared: NEECHAM Confusion Scale (NEECHAM), Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC), Delirium Observation Scale (DOS). The MMSE-K was used for concurrent validity. The nurse subjects were surveyed as to the practical clinical value of each instrument. Cronbach's α coefficient and Kuder-Richardson 20 were used to confirm the reliability. Results: The range of three scales reliability was .70~.82 and the range of correlation coefficient was .63~.82 with MMSE-K. For sensitivity of NEECHAM, Nu-DESC and DOS was 1.00, 1.00 and 0.81 respectively and specificity NEECHAM, Nu-DESC and DOS was 0.88, 0.89 and 0.89 respectively. Nurses rated the practical use of the DOS scale as significantly easier to use than the NEECHAM and Nu-DESC. Conclusion: NEECHAM, Nu-DESC and DOS scales were acceptable in terms of reliability, validity, sensitivity and specificity. However, nurses rated the DOS scale as easier scale to use and had more relevance to their practice.

KW - Aged

KW - Delirium

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892187078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892187078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7475/kjan.2012.24.6.655

DO - 10.7475/kjan.2012.24.6.655

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84892187078

VL - 25

SP - 655

EP - 664

JO - Korean Journal of Adult Nursing

JF - Korean Journal of Adult Nursing

SN - 1225-4886

IS - 6

ER -