Comparison of Emergency Medical Services and Trauma Care Systems Among Pan-Asian Countries: An International, Multicenter, Population-Based Survey

Kyong Min Sun, Kyoung Jun Song, Sang Do Shin, Hideharu Tanaka, Goh E. Shaun, Wen Chu Chiang, Kentaro Kajino, Sabariah Faizah Jamaluddin, Akio Kimura, Young Sun Ro, Dae Han Wi, Ju Ok Park, Sungwoo Moon, Young Hee Jung, Min Jung Kim, James F. Holmes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Knowledge on the current trauma systems in Asian countries is limited. The objective of this study was to describe the emergency medical services (EMS) and trauma care systems among countries participating in the Pan-Asian Trauma Outcomes Study (PATOS) Clinical Research Network. Methods: The PATOS network consists of 33 participating sites from 14 countries. Standardized data was collected from each site using an EMS survey form and included general information (population, population density, urbanization, EMS service fee, etc.), dispatcher system, trauma care practice, trauma education program, existence of a trauma registry, and data on EMS transfers. Data is described with simple descriptive statistics. Results: All countries included urban sites. Nine countries included rural sites and only one country included wilderness site. Of the 33 sties, 18 sites had physician-based EMS systems. EMS services were free in 9 countries. Twelve sites had dispatch centers operated by government health departments. EMS dispatcher certification was required in 29 sites. Thirty-two sites had EMS documented protocols for trauma and 31 sites had field triage tools. Thirty sites had designated trauma centers. Twenty-one sites had helicopter EMS systems. Thirty-one sites require certification for trauma education programs. Only 23 sites maintained EMS-based trauma registries. In 20 sites, EMS medical directors reviewed and assured trauma registry quality. Of patients transported by EMS rate of injured patients ranged from 15% to 59%. Conclusion: Substantial variability exists in EMS systems in Asia, especially for injured patients. Futures studies are required to assess the impact of this variability on patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)242-251
Number of pages10
JournalPrehospital Emergency Care
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Mar 4

Fingerprint

Emergency Medical Services
Wounds and Injuries
Population
Registries
Certification
Surveys and Questionnaires
Hordeolum
Wilderness
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Physician Executives
Education
Fee-for-Service Plans
Urbanization
Aircraft
Triage
Trauma Centers
Population Density

Keywords

  • emergency medical services
  • Pan-Asian countries
  • trauma care systems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Emergency

Cite this

Comparison of Emergency Medical Services and Trauma Care Systems Among Pan-Asian Countries : An International, Multicenter, Population-Based Survey. / Sun, Kyong Min; Song, Kyoung Jun; Shin, Sang Do; Tanaka, Hideharu; Shaun, Goh E.; Chiang, Wen Chu; Kajino, Kentaro; Jamaluddin, Sabariah Faizah; Kimura, Akio; Ro, Young Sun; Wi, Dae Han; Park, Ju Ok; Moon, Sungwoo; Jung, Young Hee; Kim, Min Jung; Holmes, James F.

In: Prehospital Emergency Care, Vol. 21, No. 2, 04.03.2017, p. 242-251.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sun, KM, Song, KJ, Shin, SD, Tanaka, H, Shaun, GE, Chiang, WC, Kajino, K, Jamaluddin, SF, Kimura, A, Ro, YS, Wi, DH, Park, JO, Moon, S, Jung, YH, Kim, MJ & Holmes, JF 2017, 'Comparison of Emergency Medical Services and Trauma Care Systems Among Pan-Asian Countries: An International, Multicenter, Population-Based Survey', Prehospital Emergency Care, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 242-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2016.1241325
Sun, Kyong Min ; Song, Kyoung Jun ; Shin, Sang Do ; Tanaka, Hideharu ; Shaun, Goh E. ; Chiang, Wen Chu ; Kajino, Kentaro ; Jamaluddin, Sabariah Faizah ; Kimura, Akio ; Ro, Young Sun ; Wi, Dae Han ; Park, Ju Ok ; Moon, Sungwoo ; Jung, Young Hee ; Kim, Min Jung ; Holmes, James F. / Comparison of Emergency Medical Services and Trauma Care Systems Among Pan-Asian Countries : An International, Multicenter, Population-Based Survey. In: Prehospital Emergency Care. 2017 ; Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 242-251.
@article{52a5b276fac9441b945d3fabec50177d,
title = "Comparison of Emergency Medical Services and Trauma Care Systems Among Pan-Asian Countries: An International, Multicenter, Population-Based Survey",
abstract = "Objective: Knowledge on the current trauma systems in Asian countries is limited. The objective of this study was to describe the emergency medical services (EMS) and trauma care systems among countries participating in the Pan-Asian Trauma Outcomes Study (PATOS) Clinical Research Network. Methods: The PATOS network consists of 33 participating sites from 14 countries. Standardized data was collected from each site using an EMS survey form and included general information (population, population density, urbanization, EMS service fee, etc.), dispatcher system, trauma care practice, trauma education program, existence of a trauma registry, and data on EMS transfers. Data is described with simple descriptive statistics. Results: All countries included urban sites. Nine countries included rural sites and only one country included wilderness site. Of the 33 sties, 18 sites had physician-based EMS systems. EMS services were free in 9 countries. Twelve sites had dispatch centers operated by government health departments. EMS dispatcher certification was required in 29 sites. Thirty-two sites had EMS documented protocols for trauma and 31 sites had field triage tools. Thirty sites had designated trauma centers. Twenty-one sites had helicopter EMS systems. Thirty-one sites require certification for trauma education programs. Only 23 sites maintained EMS-based trauma registries. In 20 sites, EMS medical directors reviewed and assured trauma registry quality. Of patients transported by EMS rate of injured patients ranged from 15{\%} to 59{\%}. Conclusion: Substantial variability exists in EMS systems in Asia, especially for injured patients. Futures studies are required to assess the impact of this variability on patient outcomes.",
keywords = "emergency medical services, Pan-Asian countries, trauma care systems",
author = "Sun, {Kyong Min} and Song, {Kyoung Jun} and Shin, {Sang Do} and Hideharu Tanaka and Shaun, {Goh E.} and Chiang, {Wen Chu} and Kentaro Kajino and Jamaluddin, {Sabariah Faizah} and Akio Kimura and Ro, {Young Sun} and Wi, {Dae Han} and Park, {Ju Ok} and Sungwoo Moon and Jung, {Young Hee} and Kim, {Min Jung} and Holmes, {James F.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/10903127.2016.1241325",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "242--251",
journal = "Prehospital Emergency Care",
issn = "1090-3127",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Emergency Medical Services and Trauma Care Systems Among Pan-Asian Countries

T2 - An International, Multicenter, Population-Based Survey

AU - Sun, Kyong Min

AU - Song, Kyoung Jun

AU - Shin, Sang Do

AU - Tanaka, Hideharu

AU - Shaun, Goh E.

AU - Chiang, Wen Chu

AU - Kajino, Kentaro

AU - Jamaluddin, Sabariah Faizah

AU - Kimura, Akio

AU - Ro, Young Sun

AU - Wi, Dae Han

AU - Park, Ju Ok

AU - Moon, Sungwoo

AU - Jung, Young Hee

AU - Kim, Min Jung

AU - Holmes, James F.

PY - 2017/3/4

Y1 - 2017/3/4

N2 - Objective: Knowledge on the current trauma systems in Asian countries is limited. The objective of this study was to describe the emergency medical services (EMS) and trauma care systems among countries participating in the Pan-Asian Trauma Outcomes Study (PATOS) Clinical Research Network. Methods: The PATOS network consists of 33 participating sites from 14 countries. Standardized data was collected from each site using an EMS survey form and included general information (population, population density, urbanization, EMS service fee, etc.), dispatcher system, trauma care practice, trauma education program, existence of a trauma registry, and data on EMS transfers. Data is described with simple descriptive statistics. Results: All countries included urban sites. Nine countries included rural sites and only one country included wilderness site. Of the 33 sties, 18 sites had physician-based EMS systems. EMS services were free in 9 countries. Twelve sites had dispatch centers operated by government health departments. EMS dispatcher certification was required in 29 sites. Thirty-two sites had EMS documented protocols for trauma and 31 sites had field triage tools. Thirty sites had designated trauma centers. Twenty-one sites had helicopter EMS systems. Thirty-one sites require certification for trauma education programs. Only 23 sites maintained EMS-based trauma registries. In 20 sites, EMS medical directors reviewed and assured trauma registry quality. Of patients transported by EMS rate of injured patients ranged from 15% to 59%. Conclusion: Substantial variability exists in EMS systems in Asia, especially for injured patients. Futures studies are required to assess the impact of this variability on patient outcomes.

AB - Objective: Knowledge on the current trauma systems in Asian countries is limited. The objective of this study was to describe the emergency medical services (EMS) and trauma care systems among countries participating in the Pan-Asian Trauma Outcomes Study (PATOS) Clinical Research Network. Methods: The PATOS network consists of 33 participating sites from 14 countries. Standardized data was collected from each site using an EMS survey form and included general information (population, population density, urbanization, EMS service fee, etc.), dispatcher system, trauma care practice, trauma education program, existence of a trauma registry, and data on EMS transfers. Data is described with simple descriptive statistics. Results: All countries included urban sites. Nine countries included rural sites and only one country included wilderness site. Of the 33 sties, 18 sites had physician-based EMS systems. EMS services were free in 9 countries. Twelve sites had dispatch centers operated by government health departments. EMS dispatcher certification was required in 29 sites. Thirty-two sites had EMS documented protocols for trauma and 31 sites had field triage tools. Thirty sites had designated trauma centers. Twenty-one sites had helicopter EMS systems. Thirty-one sites require certification for trauma education programs. Only 23 sites maintained EMS-based trauma registries. In 20 sites, EMS medical directors reviewed and assured trauma registry quality. Of patients transported by EMS rate of injured patients ranged from 15% to 59%. Conclusion: Substantial variability exists in EMS systems in Asia, especially for injured patients. Futures studies are required to assess the impact of this variability on patient outcomes.

KW - emergency medical services

KW - Pan-Asian countries

KW - trauma care systems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85001915718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85001915718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10903127.2016.1241325

DO - 10.1080/10903127.2016.1241325

M3 - Article

C2 - 27918864

AN - SCOPUS:85001915718

VL - 21

SP - 242

EP - 251

JO - Prehospital Emergency Care

JF - Prehospital Emergency Care

SN - 1090-3127

IS - 2

ER -